Part 8b) An Analysis of the FBI Video of the Road Block resulting in Lavoy Finicum’s Death.
Peter Offermann
Contact Author
February 21, 2016
Click here for links to all parts of this article.
Here we are back again after the sequence where Lavoy has left the truck and is currently milling around in the area where he is shot.
Originally I was going to give a lot of documentation here regarding his footprints during this period. I spent a lot of time analyzing this in a number of different ways but finally convinced myself that Lavoy’s movements match the visible footprints.
On my computer I can scrub ( move) backwards and forwards through any of the frames at any speed and zoom level I desire. By rolling my mouse wheel at different speeds I can examine very closely how frames fit together.
While doing this I took some tape and laid the pattern of Lavoy’s steps out on my floor and then myself tried to emulate his movements. It took awhile to make sense of his movements but eventually I was convinced his leg movements were valid. What wasn’t valid was the speed it happened at especially with all the arm movements also thrown in. I think this sequence occurs faster than it did in reality and his body and arm movements are doctored in places. I will explain why I think this further on in this segment.
I’m just quickly going to show a few images here of how I determined where there were footprints in the snow and then move on to where I believe Lavoy was shot, probably multiple times.
The following GIFs all start at the same point which is shown in the full frame image below at 35:01. You can see that Lavoy is already well away from the truck. There are 5 agents at the blockade at this point.
#1 is behind Lavoy’s truck pointing a gun at him.
#2 is the one that was almost hit by Lavoy’s truck. He is starting to make his way towards the front of the back truck.
#3 is hard to see as he is crouched at the back of the truck. He has been in this position since Lavoy exited the truck and could possibly have shot Lavoy in the back causing him to fall forward to his knees before Lavoy changed direction. This would explain why the earlier sequence at the truck was altered.
#4 & #5 are standing between the two trucks and at least #5, probably both, are pointing weapons at Lavoy.
There are 3 different gif sequences below that are cut out of different areas of the next 84 frames. I did this to isolate specific events occurring in those areas so they could be seen in more detail. The first 2 sequences are presented in 3 different ways for clarity purpose. First at original resolution and speed, secondly blown up for extra detail at the original speed, and thirdly blown up at a slower 2 frames per second so the progression of events can better be seen.
When trying to spot alteration in videos through deleting or adding frames the place that such alterations are most obvious is where there are moving objects. If you remove frames moving objects will appear to jump from place to place or smear.
During this period there are 4 moving objects. Lavoy, agents #1, #2 and #3.
First sequence…. #2 agent is the one to watch.
Notice that at the start of the sequence, and at the end of the sequence, Agent #2 is clearly seen and well defined. As he leaves the back of the truck and starts ducking, probably to stay out of the line of fire of agent #4 & #5, he starts to blend into the background and almost becomes invisible as he nears the front of the other truck. Looking at these frames at a large size one at a time there are many glaring indicators of alteration.
When he gets to the truck it appears very briefly that he walked into the wheel well and disappeared. Only a bit of his head shows up briefly on the hood above the grill. From that point on he appears to be a shadow moving across the grill before he pops up while becoming solid near the center of the truck. If you look closely in the slow version you will notice that you can see the lines of the grill and bumper through his body until he starts to rise. This is impossible in real life at 30 frames per second. There is no technical smearing of action occurring at the speed he is moving.
Frames were taken out of the video in this sequence which would have resulted in his appearing to jump from place to place. What they did was painted him into the background as much as they could so his interrupted jerky movements wouldn’t catch your eye. In front of the grill the missing frames probably made his body appear the full width of half the grill and they tried to diminsh that as much as possible by painting the grill and bumper back in on some frames.
Second sequence… #3 agent moves from the back of the truck to the front of the truck at the same time as agent #2 moves above.
They almost painted out all of agent #3 movements until he gets to the door. They tried to make it look like he just stepped out from behind the door. When looking at these frames closely you can see when he starts moving because the dark spot on the yellow line behind the truck disappears. You can also see some of the smeared out lighter blue of his pants as he moves towards the front door.
Third Sequence… agent #1 and Lavoy I only present this sequence at one size and speed as I will do a more thorough analysis with still frames to explain what happens here. The sequence starts at the same point but I let it run longer to the point where Lavoy starts to fall. I do this to give some sense of context to his death. The speed is 2 frames per second slow motion. The red dot shown in one frame partway through the sequence is when agent #2 starts to disappear. The green dot is when he reappears.
Watch agent #1 closely at the bottom of the frame. He is constantly moving until the red dot appears. He is not likely able to take a shot while he is moving. At the red dot he has both feet firmly planted for the first time and stays that way for a few seconds. This is the first opportunity he would have to take a shot, or several shots at Lavoy. This is where frames are missing.
Below are 16 frames of Lavoy blown up from 1/8 of a second before the dot to almost half a second afterwards.
Agent #1 is now in a shooting stance. Notice that Lavoy has his hands in the air. I think they faked his hand movements before this point. He likely had his hands in the air up until this point. There are slight signs of alteration in the areas his arms would have been.
Notice Lavoy’s left leg starts to appear strange above his left knee.
More noticeable notch.
A better rendition below. Notice the sharpening artifacts only at his knee and shoulder. Notice the area between his knee and shoulder is lighter than anywhere else .
Notice how the front of Lavoy’s body has more noticeable light artifacts.
The jog in his knee is almost gone.
Ooops it’s back again.
Almost back to real life… notice the front of his body now also has a smooth texture similar to the back.
What might we see if agent #1 shot Lavoy during this sequence? I don’t think the resolution is good enough to see a muzzle flash but there was probably visible recoil of the weapon when he fired and / or Lavoy’s reaction when he was hit. The weapon recoil(s) would be very brief and could likely be taken out in 2 or 3 frames. Lavoy’s reaction would likely be of longer term and the shock would likely have changed his position rapidly so they would need to paint in something to mask this change over a number of frames.
Lavoy was likely moved backwards quickly by a shot. If they took the frames of the gun recoil out there then Lavoy would likely look fatter. This is why they modified his front to make him look thinner. They should have done the same to his left leg. I did notice an inconsistency of Lavoy's body thickness in the next few frames which didn't quite coincide with his turning sideways.
If there was only one shot that could have been cleaned up in one quick sequence and there would not be any need to mask the actions of agents #2 & #3 over an 82 frame sequence. To me this suggests that Lavoy was shot more than once at this point.
There are other frames shortly after this sequence that don’t look quite right but the alterations are not as obvious as they are here.
There is a good chance they took quite a few frames out here and this would explain why they took out frames earlier on and also introduced blur in several places. Without replacing frames taken out, which would require hand painting the new frames to match, this sequence would move much faster than the rest of Lavoy’s movements. This would stick out. Looking at the earlier frames there is little movement of anyone else making it easy to take out frames unnoticeably. The only exception is right at the first big blur. Before the big blur agents #3, #4, & #5 are standing behind the truck on the far right and agent #1 is not visible. After the big blur (3.5 seconds) they are already in the positions I numbered above.
From the start of watching this video I was confused about why Lavoy turned back towards his truck and why he moved his arms around as much as he did near the end of this sequence.
Here’s what I now think happened. Lavoy reaches the point of the red dot with his hands in the air, agent #1 then shoots him at least once. Lavoy drops his arms to hold himself where he has been shot. If the agent shot more than once Lavoy knows the agent is trying to kill him. The only semblance of shelter nearby is his truck so he heads for it. The agent on the hillside, which I didn’t number, drops Lavoy after he turns towards the truck. I think they painted in a few arm movements at this point to hide the fact that Lavoy was holding his lower left abdomen.
In my mind there is no doubt that a crime has been committed here.
I will continue on tomorrow with part 9 and fill in some details about visible gunfire at the scene.



http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.htmlThe
http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.htmlThe
http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.htmlThe
http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.htmlThe
http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.htmlThe 
"It was a dried gourd that brought whales to the edge of extinction in the 19th Century. "
"Water may stain the frescos, earthquakes may close the tunnels, but the temples will survive.
"These signs and portents point to a coming Anthropocene that will not be your daddy’s World Wa
"That lump in your throat you feel listening to someone laying down hard truth in a poetic way
"Our biological and cultural blinders are equal in every way to those worn by Material Evangeli
I just wanted to say you did a damn good job and I will be sharing this with everyone I know
Wow… What can be done about this? Where can it be taken? There must be someone in authority who will view this with an open mind and dig deeper… As in get it before a grand jury to investigate. Is that not what grand juries do is investigate crimes, subpoena witnesses and such? Is it legally allowed for a citizen group to convene a grand jury? Or could a citizen group file charges before a grand jury without the district attorney filing it? I have heard that it can be done. Please reply.
Actually the Grand Jury is our, the people's, tool. We can call and create a Grand Jury Investigation, etc on our own and it IS lawful.
“The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.
“Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)
“The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”
“Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”
“The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”
“Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”
“Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful of them to do so.) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)
Thank you Cal! Very good information provided your data and thesis statement are accurate! And I believe your statements are accurate as they agree with the little bit of research i did on the matter many years ago. Provided we are acting on truly legal information let me ask this question: What is the process? How can the citizens of a state or county get this information before a legally empaneled grand jury to get all of the evidence reviewed? I believe that this clearly needs to be done in a manner that none of the several government agencies involved can control the proceedings. And it needs to be done before a legal grand jury that has the power to issue indictments if they believe a crime has been committed. Thus if this can be done it should be done. And that begs the question: Who should take up the task. Has this been presented to anyone like the Oath Keepers? If the federal government isempaneling grand juries should not the citizens who be
Who believe the several government agencies may be parties to criminal acts should they not have the peace of mind afforded them to have a grand jury investigate the matter. It may be very beneficial to do so to give the citizens peace of mind and take a step toward restoring their confidence in the agencies involved.
Peter, Thank you so very much for the work you have done. The American public owes you a tremendous debt. Please carry this through. Concerning a querie you raised in re: What is "Green $4" I think one of the women who were in the vehicle said that when she exited the vehicle she was nervous and dropped her cell phone which she had been using to record the events that had just transpired. If I remember correctly she said the authorities would not allow her to retrieve it and would not return it. I believe it was the older woman Mrs. Cox was perhaps her name. Perhaps you might be able to make contact and ask her.
Peter, I am anxiously awaiting Part 9…thank you for taking time to do this!!