Why EROEI matters: the role of net energy in the survival of civilization

youtube-Logo-2gc2reddit-logoOff the keyboard of Ugo Bardi

Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666
Friend us on Facebook

Published on Cassandra's Legacy on March 13, 2017

cassandra_retouched

Discuss this article at the Energy Table inside the Diner

 

 

The image above was shown by Charlie Hall in a recent presentation that he gave in Princeton. It seems logic that the more net energy is available for a civilization, the more that civilization can do, say, build cathedrals, create art, explore space, and more. But what's needed, exactly, for a civilization to exist? Maybe very high values of the EROEI (energy return on energy invested) are not necessary.

A lively debate is ongoing on what should be the minimum energy return for energy invested (EROEI) in order to sustain a civilization. Clearly, one always wants the best returns for one's investments. And, of course, investing in something that provides a return smaller than one is a bad idea, to say the least. So, a civilization grows and prosper on the energy it receives. The question is whether the transition from fossil fuels to renewables could provide enough energy to keep civilization alive in a form not too different from the present one.

It is often said that the prosperity of our society is the result of the high EROEI of crude oil as it was in mid 20th century. Values as high as 100 are often cited, but these are probably widely off the mark. The data reported in a 2014 study by Dave Murphy indicate that the average EROEI of crude oil worldwide could have been around 35 in the past, declining to around 20 at present. Dale et al. estimate (2011) that the average EROEI of crude oil could have been, at most, around 45 in the 1960s Data for the US production indicate an EROEI around 20 in the 1950s; down to about 10 today.

We see that the EROEI of oil is not easy to estimate but we can say at least two things: 1) our civilization was built on an energy source with an EROEI around 30-40. 2) the EROEI of oil has been going down owing to the depletion of the most profitable (high EROEI) wells. Today, we may be producing crude oil at EROEIs between 10 and 20, and it keeps going down.

Let's move to renewables. Here, the debate often becomes dominated by emotional or political factors that seem to bring people to try to disparage renewables as much as possible. Some evidently wrong assessments claim EROEIs smaller than one for the most promising renewable technology, photovoltaics (PV). In other cases, the game consists in enlarging the boundaries of the calculation, adding costs not directly related to the exploitation of the resource. That's why we should compare what's comparable; that is, use the same rules for evaluating the EROEI of fossil fuels and that of renewable energy. If we do that, we find that, for instance, photovoltaics has an EROEI around 10. Wind energy does better than that, with an average EROEI around 20. Not bad, but surely not as large as crude oil in the good old days.

Now, for the mother of all questions: on the basis of these data, can renewables replace the increasing energy expensive oil and sustain civilization? Here, we venture into a difficult field: what do we mean exactly as a "civilization"? What kind of civilization could a renewable-powered society support? Could it build cathedrals? Would it include driving SUVs? How about plane trips to Hawaii?

Here, some people are very pessimistic, and not just about SUVs and plane trips. On the basis of the fact that the EROEI of renewables is smaller than that of crude oil, considering also the expense of the infrastructure needed to adapt our society to the kind of energy produced by renewables, they conclude that "renewables cannot sustain a civilization that can sustain renewables." (a little like Groucho Marx's joke "I wouldn't want to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members.").

Maybe, but I beg to differ. Let me explain with an example. Suppose, just for the sake of argument, that the energy source that powers society has an EROEI equal to 2. You would think that this is an abysmally low value and that it couldn't support anything more than a society of mountain shepherds, and probably not even that. But think about what an EROEI of 2 implies: for each plant in operation there must be a second one of the same size that only produces the energy that will be used to replace both plants after that they have gone through their lifetime. And the energy produced by the first plant comes for free. Now, consider a power source that has an EROEI= infinity; then you don't need the second plant. So, the difference is only a factor of two in the investments necessary to maintain the energy producing system forever.

It is like that: the EROEI is a strongly non-linear measurement. You can see that in the well-known diagram below (here in a simplified version, some people trace a line in the graph indicating the "minimum EROEI needed for civilization", which I think is unjustified)):

 

 

You see that oil, wind, coal, and solar are all in the same range. As long as the EROEI is higher than about 5-10, the energy return is reasonably good, at most you have to re-invest 10% of the production to keep the system going, which is pretty reasonable. It is only when the EROEI it becomes smaller than ca. 2 that things become awkward. So, it doesn't seem to be so difficult to support a complex civilization with the technologies we have. Maybe trips to Hawaii and SUVs wouldn't be included in a PV-based society (note the low EROEI of biofuels) but about art, science, health care, and the like, well, what's the problem?

There is a problem, though. And it has to do with growth. Let me go back to the example I made before, that of a hypothetical energy technology that has an EROEI = 2. If this energy return is calculated over a lifetime of 25 years, it means that the best that can be done in terms of growth is to double the number of plants over 25 years, a yearly growth rate of less than 3%. And that in the hypothesis that all the energy produced by the plants would go to make more plants which, of course, makes no sense. If we assume that, say, 10% of the energy produced is invested in new plants then, with EROEI=2, growth can be at most of the order of 0.3%. Even with an EROEI =10, we can't reasonably expect renewables to push their own growth at rates higher than 1%-2%(*). Things were different in the good old days, up to about 1970, when, with an EROEI around 40, crude oil production grew at a yearly rate of 7%. It seemed normal, at that time, but it was the result of very special conditions.

So, the problem is here: our society is fixated on growth and, in order to have high rates of growth, we need high EROEIs. Renewables are good for a steady-state society but probably can't support a fast growing one. But is it a bad thing? I wouldn't say so. We have grown enough with crude oil, actually way too much. Slowing down, and even going back a little, can only improve the situation.

(*) The present problem is not to keep the unsustainable growth rates that society is accustomed to. It is how to grow renewable energy fast enough to replace fossil fuels before depletion or climate change (or both) destroy us. This is a difficult but not impossible task. The current fraction of energy produced by wind and solar combined is less than 2% of the final consumption (see p. 28 of the REN21 report), so we need a yearly growth of more than 10% to replace fossils by 2050. Right now, both solar and wind are growing at more than a 20% yearly rate, but this high rate is obtained using energy from fossil fuels. The calculations indicate that it is possible to keep these growth rates while gradually phasing out fossil fuels by 2050, as described here

 

2 Responses to Why EROEI matters: the role of net energy in the survival of civilization

  • JJGrey says:

    Growth occures not only economically but in population as well. A population growth rate of doubling about every 20 years is more or less expected. If the net economic growth does not match population growth, the population experiences a decline in quality of life. This is EXACTLY what we seem to be seeing today around the world. Developing nations that had briefly been having an improved quality of life are no longer seeing such an improvement and are in fact in many cases seeing a reversal in quality of life. 1st world nations have reduced their native population growth to a point that it seldom exceeded their economic growth, BUT then these nations allow excess population from developing nations to immigrate, which brings down the developed nations standard of living. That is why the USA has 'pushback' against the hispanic immigrants from Mexico and countries further south, why much of europe is seeing the birth and rebirth of anti-immigrant and pro-native political movements, etc.

    Nothing is wrong with immigration when it is a controlled trickle that is less than the economic growth of a country, an less than the growth of the countries 'native' population (for the USA this refers to the 'WASP' type population, not the minority American Native Tribes). But when Economic growth slows, and migrantion increases or appears to increase (and the two often go together)  then you get increasing tensions and conflict.

    A unified population without significant immigration (i.e.: Japan)  in a developed nation still suffers tensions and conflict as the EROEI of their industry trends downward, but it is far less tension and conflict; and the population will often choose to reduce their growth voluntarily. There are problems with taking the  path of reduced population growth as well (Japan is expecting many of their nursing homes to become largely automated as they can not find enough qualified native population young people to take over the various necessary grunt work).  Also in the medium run, reducing population growth like japan has, can leave a nation vulnerable to hostile neighbors either from outright invasion, or just being out competed for resources.

  • Disaffected says:

    Short answer: Read Wiliam Catton's book <i>Overshoot</i>.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00VVH4UGG/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1

    THEN discuss.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Support the Diner
Search the Diner
Surveys & Podcasts

NEW SURVEY

Renewable Energy

VISIT AND FOLLOW US ON DINER SOUNDCLOUD

" As a daily reader of all of the doomsday blogs, e.g. the Diner, Nature Bats Last, Zerohedge, Scribbler, etc… I must say that I most look forward to your “off the microphone” rants. Your analysis, insights, and conclusions are always logical, well supported, and clearly articulated – a trifecta not frequently achieved."- Joe D
Archives
Global Diners

View Full Diner Stats

Global Population Stats

Enter a Country Name for full Population & Demographic Statistics

Lake Mead Watch

http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/NA-BX686_LakeMe_G_20130816175615.jpg

loading

Inside the Diner

The idea that growing human numbers will destroy the planet is nonsense. But over-consumption willMany of today’s most-respected thinkers, from Stephen Hawking to David Attenborough, argue that our efforts to fight climate change and other envi...

Barack Obama will be paid $400,000 for speaking at a conference by investment firm Cantor Fitzgerald.Former president Barack Obama reemerged this week for his first formal ...

Nearly three years ago, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi made one of the boldest comments on public health that I have ever heard from an elected official. It's still having a big impact today.He made the comment during his first speech to the nati...

Robert Menard said there were too many Muslim children in his city's schoolsRobert Menard is the mayor of Beziers...

Taiwanese trekker Liang Sheng-yue, who was rescued alive after being stranded in the Himalayas for 47 days, has a meal in a hospita...

Diner Twitter feed
Knarf’s Knewz

Barack Obama will be paid $400,000 for speaking at [...]

Nearly three years ago, Indian Prime Minister Nare [...]

Robert Menard said there were too many Muslim chil [...]

Taiwanese trekker Liang Sheng-yue, who was rescued [...]

Diner Newz Feeds
  • Surly
  • Agelbert
  • Knarf
  • Golden Oxen
  • Frostbite Falls

I got tired of looking at the fucked up page displ [...]

Yer morning paper.[url=http://pa... [...]

Yer afternoon paper.The SurlyZoneA collection of a [...]

Add Maureen Dean:QuoteSilent Coup is a book writte [...]

Quote from: azozeo on April 26, 2017, 07:25:25 AMQ [...]

Voodoo Economics Are Back - Bigly [embed=640,412] [...]

Save this. The Pruitt EPA will try to make it disa [...]

Quickening Arctic Thaw Could Cost Trillions, Inter [...]

Why are Lifeboats Killing Seafarers? April 25, 201 [...]

Quote from: K-Dog on April 26, 2017, 01:27:08 PMWh [...]

Barack Obama will be paid $400,000 for speaking at [...]

Nearly three years ago, Indian Prime Minister Nare [...]

Robert Menard said there were too many Muslim chil [...]

Taiwanese trekker Liang Sheng-yue, who was rescued [...]

Quote from: azozeo on April 25, 2017, 01:59:58 PMT [...]

There may not be a banking system after next week. [...]

Quote from: azozeo on April 25, 2017, 01:05:19 PMA [...]

AnonHQRussia is one of the more powerful nations i [...]

Gold getting hammered even more now. [...]

I paired my BT Stereo Earbuds to the new Lenovo, a [...]

http://www.youtube.com/v/wCIb5HRCsGA [...]

Bring on the Trebuchets!REhttp://www.youtube.com/v [...]

It's a joy to have your "people" HA [...]

My new Digibit Debit Card arrived finally today, s [...]

Alternate Perspectives
  • Two Ice Floes
  • Jumping Jack Flash
  • From Filmers to Farmers

Spring Has Sprung By Cognitive Dissonance   My apologies for being absent for the last week or so, b [...]

First Impression By Cognitive Dissonance . "You never get a second chance to make a first impre [...]

Fear, Pain and First Till By Cognitive Dissonance   Because I have been struggling with back issues [...]

It Hurts When I Do This By Cognitive Dissonance   “Well, then don’t do that” is the proper response [...]

Standard Issue Incompetence - More Evidence of Imperial Decay (Time for Fight or Flight?) By Cogniti [...]

Event Update For 2017-04-25http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.html Th [...]

Event Update For 2017-04-24http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.html Th [...]

Event Update For 2017-04-23http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.html Th [...]

Event Update For 2017-04-22http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.html Th [...]

Event Update For 2017-04-21http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.html Th [...]

When you wish upon a star the Blue Fairy sends Tinker Bell, who plants a magic seed, which grows int [...]

Wendell Berry: "What I stand for is what I stand on"; Fanfare Ciocărlia: "What we pla [...]

The sounds of the Romanian countryside, unleashed by Fanfare Ciocărlia for twenty years and counting [...]

Fanfare Ciocărlia's lead vocalists (and trumpet players) Radulescu Lazar and Costică "Cima [...]

When I finally made the first steps to end my abstention after more than ten years in the "musi [...]

Daily Doom Photo

man-watching-tv

Sustainability
  • Peak Surfer
  • SUN
  • Transition Voice

The Greater Fool"The overdeveloped countries are raising generations of gamblers."  All ecosystems, includ [...]

Confounding Collapse"As brilliant as your conceptual breakthrough may be, there is no escaping your cultural milieu [...]

The Flies of Summer"Any faith that China will be standing at the base of the burning building with a fireman’s net [...]

The Cool Lab"Is it possible that technology no more complicated than an Easy Bake Oven — one that pays for [...]

Rescuing Los Angeles"How can we use our hard wiring to communicate to the herd that it is time to veer off from a r [...]

 The Daily SUN☼ Building a Better Tomorrow by Sustaining Universal Needs April 3, 2017 Powering Down [...]

Off the keyboard of Bob Montgomery Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666 Friend us on Facebook Publishe [...]

Visit SUN on Facebook Here [...]

Click here to visit Sustaining Universal Needs’ YouTube Channel! [...]

In the echo-sphere of political punditry consensus forms rapidly, gels, and then, in short order…cal [...]

Discussions with figures from Noam Chomsky and Peter Senge to Thich Nhat Hanh and the Dalai Lama off [...]

Lefty Greenies have some laudable ideas. Why is it then that they don't bother to really build [...]

Democracy and politics would be messy business even if all participants were saints. But America doe [...]

A new book argues that, in order to survive climate change and peak oil, the global money economy ne [...]

Top Commentariats
  • Our Finite World
  • Economic Undertow

It is complicated but not impossible to detect defective EROEI. All industry's must be self fun [...]

I keep wondering whether all of the cloud-related storage of files is a real advance. I would rather [...]

Perhaps "surplus energy" should be defined as "rising energy per capita". [...]

As a species, we have never lived with CO2 levels this high. We are in new territory. [...]

Ultimately, it is the 7.5 billion of us people who need to try to continue to live on this planet wh [...]

The establishment is doing everything it can to kick the various cans down the road, but it really c [...]

Several including Ugo Bardi and the fine folks at Peak Oil Barrel have taken issue with it: http://c [...]

From the Credit Bubble Bulletin; It’s evolved into a global issue: There’s no cure for major asset B [...]

Do you think Hills Group is correct re 2022? Gail T. says math is wrong. [...]

If the Bank of Japan buys up government bonds at negative interest rates, that would mean that their [...]

RE Economics

Going Cashless

Off the keyboard of RE Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666...

Simplifying the Final Countdown

Off the keyboard of RE Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666...

Bond Market Collapse and the Banning of Cash

Off the microphone of RE Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666...

Do Central Bankers Recognize there is NO GROWTH?

Discuss this article @ the ECONOMICS TABLE inside the...

Singularity of the Dollar

Off the Keyboard of RE Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666...

Kurrency Kollapse: To Print or Not To Print?

Off the microphone of RE Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666...

SWISSIE CAPITULATION!

Off the microphone of RE Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666...

Of Heat Sinks & Debt Sinks: A Thermodynamic View of Money

Off the keyboard of RE Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666...

Merry Doomy Christmas

Off the keyboard of RE Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666...

Peak Customers: The Final Liquidation Sale

Off the keyboard of RE Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666...

Collapse Fiction
Useful Links
Technical Journals

This paper highlights the results of bioclimatic-envelope modeling of whiptail lizards belonging to [...]

Extreme weather, by definition, is any unexpected, unusual, unpredictable, severe or unseasonal weat [...]

Cities generally adopt territorial- or production-based rather than consumption-based emissions acco [...]

Follow on our http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/forum/