PE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Exhibits presented in the investigation of the Sandy Hook School Shooting.

AuthorTopic: Exhibits presented in the investigation of the Sandy Hook School Shooting.  (Read 5245 times)

Offline peter

  • Administrator
  • Waitstaff
  • *****
  • Posts: 413
    • View Profile
Re: Exhibits presented in the investigation of the Sandy Hook School Shooting.
« Reply #15 on: February 03, 2013, 12:51:12 PM »
Quote
CRISIS MANAGEMENT INC INFORMATION

DEMONSTRATION OF POSTING A NEWS ITEM, WHICH WAS CREATED ON YOUR OWN COMPUTER, AUTOMATICALLY TO A BLOG

This demonstration shows how CMI could automatically, and quickly, post an article to many CMS powered websites, by utilizing only off the shelf free software.

The software demonstrated here is Windows Live Writer (WLW).  There are a large number of editors with similar capabilities, some of which need to be purchased.

WLW gives a non-technical user a document editor on their own computer, where they can create documents meant to be published on blogs in a similar manner to the more normal practice of composing such documents directly on their WordPress, SpireCMS, or other type of blog.

While composing documents in this manner the author is not connected to the blog. The author does not even need to be connected to the internet, unless they want to add material to the document, such as pictures and videos, that are not available on their own computer, and only available somewhere out on the web.

Once the author is happy with the document on their computer, one click will automatically do the following....

Depending on the button they click [Publish] or [Post draft to blog]

a)  submit the document to the selected blog as a draft, for further editing on the site itself, at a later date, before it becomes visible to site visitors. (Only the Author, Editors, and Admins will see there is a draft not yet published)

or

b)   submit the document to the selected blog as a completed published document which immediately becomes visible to all visitors.

c) automatically upload all resources, such as images or pdf files, included in the document, and place them in the correct place on the blog.

d) Make the article visible in the right area of the blog, IE "NEWS" in the case of CMI.

The screen captures below demonstrate how simple to use, but powerful such software is.



Below is what the program looks like on the authors screen.
(The red items are notes I've added to the image)

feb 3 007 blogs
feb 3 007 blogs
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.



The first thing an author that needs to submit articles to many different blogs has to do in WLW, is to give WLW the location of each blog and their login credentials. The screen shown below illustrates what must be done for each CMS site they contribute to.

Once the author gives their credentials for a particular site the program automatically visits the site, logs in as the author and gets all the information available to the author.

The program then knows what the author is allowed to do on that site.

The program, if told to do so, can also download templates of all pages on the site which the author is authorized to access so the templates can be used on his own computer as needed.

feb 3 015
feb 3 015
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.

Notice near the top left where the image above show "(W) Doomstead Diner". This means that the current document will be sent to a Wordpress Blog called Doomstead Diner when the [Publish] or [Post draft to blog] button is pressed.

There is a small down arrow after (W) "Doomstead Diner".

Clicking the arrow opens a list of all the blogs the author publishes to.

Selecting a different blog so it shows that name instead of Doomstead means that when either [Publish] or [Post draft to blog] are clicked, the same document will instead be sent to that blog.

By switching the current blog in the list, an author can quickly send the same, or different, documents to many places.

If the Author chooses [Publish] there is nothing further they need to do in order to make the  document available to the public.

With tools such as WLW an author never actually needs to visit the site(s) they publish to when creating a new article. 



The information WLW gathers when an author first tells the program about a blog they publish to, remains available to the program as a profile for all further articles sent to that blog. The blog only needs to be re-profiled if the layout of the blog changes. Re-profiling a blog only takes a couple of clicks.

The profile for a specific blog is detailed to the point of allowing the author to easily do, on their own computer, everything they could do while creating a document on the actual blog. The 2 images below give examples of this.

Set Published Date.
feb 3 010
feb 3 010
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.

Set Location on Blog where item is to appear.
In the case of CMI and ALS there would an item [News]. Placing a checkmark next to it would publish the article to thr news stream at ALS
feb 3 013
feb 3 013
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.



Quote
If CMI only worked with a few hundred schools or less, they could get by just using this free software WLW to keep schools current rather than buying an expensive piece of news broadcasting software.

IF an author was preparing to publish a NEWS item on the ALS using WLW, accidentally pressing [PUBLISH] instead of [Post draft to blog], would immediately result in a RSS notification going out to all subscribers to the site. Google and other search engines would also receive the notification.

In WLW one mistaken click by an author, between two buttons in close proximity to each other, would be responsible for the records found in the Google and Wayback Machine Cache's.

« Last Edit: February 03, 2013, 02:48:18 PM by peter »

Offline peter

  • Administrator
  • Waitstaff
  • *****
  • Posts: 413
    • View Profile
Re: Exhibits presented in the investigation of the Sandy Hook School Shooting.
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2013, 01:08:23 PM »
Quote
REGARDING JEREMY'S (ALS SITE DEVELOPER) EXPLANATION THAT HIS CODING ERRORS CAUSED THE DOCUMENTS TO DISPLAY WRONG DATES

This exhibit has 3 parts.

1) A screen capture below taken by myself on January 3, 2013, of the Arlington Local School's Website Home Page.

2) A screen capture of the ALS website indexing layout I created using a site crawler program, demonstrating News and Calendar events are kept separately on the site.

3) An illustration of the contents of the ALS Newsfeed during December 2012.
 




Arlington Local School's Website Home Page
feb 3 016
feb 3 016
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.

 I have done 2 markups on the image above.

The markup in bright green shows 2 current NEWS items on the page.

The markup in bright yellow shows CALENDAR items on the page.



Arlington Local School's Website Index
als site tree
als site tree
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.



An illustration of the contents of the ALS Newsfeed during December 2012.
feb 4 018 sm
feb 4 018 sm
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.

The illustration above has information in it not yet needing explanation.

The only items of interest here are the 3 news items that were live on the ALS site during December 2012.

1) Please refer to the row that has 107 in it under DATABASE RECORD NUMBER. This record holds a news item published on October 11, 2012 announcing the December Newsletter is now available.

2) Please refer to the row that has 108 in it under DATABASE RECORD NUMBER. This record holds a news item published on December 3, 2012 announcing Winter Break information is now available.

3) Please refer to the row that has 109 in it under DATABASE RECORD NUMBER. This record holds a news item created on December 10, 2012 that would announce the availability of the PDF from CMI regarding, talking to your children about the Sandy Hook Events  was now available, IF it's status was "PUBLIC".

4) Please refer to the row that has 111 in it under DATABASE RECORD NUMBER. This record holds a duplicate of a news item first created on December 10, 2012 that publicly announces the availability of the PDF from CMI regarding, talking to your children about the Sandy Hook Events  was now available.

With the above 3 public items in the newsfeed database, beginning on December 12, 2012, until any of the 3 currently live news items were deleted, the ALS home page would show those items in the news stream section of the page in the order below.

1) At the top of the news stream an excerpt  from the "Talking to your children" news item.

2) Below 1) in the middle of the news stream, an excerpt  from the "Winter Break Announcement" news item.

3) Below 2) at the bottom of the news stream, an excerpt  from the "December Newsletter Available" news item.

The ORDER these 3 items appear in within the news stream is determined by each items unique 'Published Date'

The news items are displayed in descending  'Published Date' order with the Sandy Hook Document at the top.

Anyone with proper authority on the site could re-arrange their order by changing any items 'Published Date'.

Unlike the calendar, where it is critical to link a calendar item to a specific date, a simple descending date sort of the active database records, which does not depend on code Jeremy wrote, rather is an infallible database function call, would place the 3 items automatically in the right order just using the default date established when the items were created.

There is no need to manipulate the dates on NEWSFEED items because the database itself determines the correct order, not code Jeremy wrote.

The calendar item feed is another matter all together. Jeremy either wrote the code that displays the popup calendar allowing authors to point at the published date of an item, rather than typing it in manually, or bought the function from someone else.

Integrating the popup calendar into SpireCMS would depend on code Jeremy wrote. The process of placing selected dates into the right spot on a calendar displayed on screen is quite complex. Jeremy would need to write this code and could easily have made a mistake while doing this.

A mistake in popup calendar integration related code would not impact the sort order of news stream items. The default date automatically added when creating a new item would immediately place the 'TODAY' date correctly into the new record without needing to access the popup calendar.

If the calendar was afterwards used in the NEWS STREAM to change the default published date, it might then enter the wrong published date into the item, but the author would immediately see that wrong date, and keep trying different dates in the popup calendar until the corrct 'published date appeared' on the news item.


There is more to the above which I will explain later at the appropriate time.

« Last Edit: February 04, 2013, 01:30:16 PM by peter »

Offline peter

  • Administrator
  • Waitstaff
  • *****
  • Posts: 413
    • View Profile
Re: Exhibits presented in the investigation of the Sandy Hook School Shooting.
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2013, 12:55:34 PM »
Quote
REGARDING JEREMY'S (ALS SITE DEVELOPER) EXPLANATION THAT HIS CODING ERRORS CAUSED THE DOCUMENTS TO DISPLAY WRONG DATES

This exhibit confirms that both the Google Web Archives and the Wayback Machine Archives only found 2 versions of the ALS News announcement about Sandy Hook.

The first shows that is was created on dec 10th and was published on Dec 10th  VIEW HERE 

The second shows that is was created on dec 10th but was published on Dec 13th  VIEW HERE

Jeremy, the ALS website developer stated that the school created the article on Dec 17th, 2012.

If that was the case and the default published date was left alone at "Dec 17, 2012" then there should be a google archive page at http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/17/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk There isn't.

For thoroughness I checked all dates between Dec 10th and Dec 20th. There were no returns.

* Until January 23, 2013 the google cache for dec  10th did have a positive return http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:sFg-ITDrjT0J:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/10/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk

For some unknown reason Google removed the Dec 10th page from their cache on Jan 23, 2013. 

That Google removed a page out of their archive is highly unusual, possibly even unprecedented.

The WayBack Machine cache still contains a copy of the Dec 10th article but none for any other dates.

Below are links to confirm for yourself what I say above is accurate.




Google Archives Search URL's to see if a document called "talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy" was found on any other dates than Dec 10th.

These searches were conducted on Feb 5, 2013

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/10/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

feb 5 038
feb 5 038

Up until January 23, 2013 the above search returned the page shown below.
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/11/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/12/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/13/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/14/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/15/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/16/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/17/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/18/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/19/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/20/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

On January 5th, 2013, each return above gave a return page as shown below. The only difference on the page was the date referenced in the search.

feb 5 020
feb 5 020





WayBack Machine (WBM) Archives Search URL's to see if a document called "talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy" was found on any other dates than Dec 10th.

Searches below were conducted on February 5, 2013.

http://web.archive.org/web/20130108013319/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/10/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

This search returned the page shown below.

feb 5 030
feb 5 030
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.

The page shows that the Wayback Machine found the page 7 times.

Clicking on "7 captures" shows when those finds occurred (shown in image below).

feb 5 032
feb 5 032

Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.

The blue circles on Jan are the dates the document was found. On the dates with small blue circles, the page was only found once. On dates with large blue circles the document was found twice.

Clicking the blue circles individually for each date 8, 9, 10, 14, and 17 shows what the page looked like on that particular day.

On Jan 8,9,10, and 14 the WBM showed the page below.
feb 5 030
feb 5 030
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.

On Jan 17 the WBM instead showed the page below. (a 404 page not found error)

This means that the ALS website admin deleted the page on Jan 15, 16 or 17. The WBM stopped looking for the page after Jan 17, 2013.
feb 5 031
feb 5 031
Click the image above to view a higher resolution version.

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/11/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/12/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/13/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/14/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/15/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/16/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/17/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/18/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/19/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/20/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

For all the searches above except the Dec 10th one the WBM returned a page similar to the one shown below. The only difference was the date being searched for in the search.

feb 5 033
feb 5 033



Quote
CONCLUSION: Neither the Google or Wayback Machine Archives contain(ed) a record of the news item regarding the CMI pdf on any date other than Dec 10, 2012.

In the exhibit above this one CLICK HERE I demonstrated that there was no need in the Newsfeed section of the ALS website to pre-date a news item to make it appear in the right place.

When a new news item is created by a user the code automatically inserts the 'today' date of the 'computers' clock, on the host server where the website resides, without intervention from the user.

The PERMALINK / URL for a document created on Dec 17, 2012 would shows as http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/17/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy 

The Published date for a document created on Dec 17, 2012 would automatically, without intervention by the user be set to Dec 17th 2012.

If the person entering the news item into the ALS website on December 17, 2012 chose for some reason to change the published date to Dec 10th instead, they could do that. They would however immediately see a Published date of Dec 10, 2012 instead of Dec 17, 2012. They would also realize that any viewer of the News item would also see a Dec 10, 2012 published date.

I will prove the following statements further on in the investigation.

When using the SpireCMS to create a news item on Dec 17, 2012 and then manually changing the published date to Dec 10, 2012, the PERMALINK would still be the same as when the item was created. http://www.arlingtonlocalschools.com/news/2012/12/17/talking-with-your-child-about-the-sandy-hook-tragedy

When using SpireCMS only the published date would change to Dec 10, 2012.

Instead using WordPress, and most likely most other CMS software to create the news item, the results would be different. After manually changing the published date The PERMALINK/ URL will change  for the document. It would then contain /2012/12/10/ not /2012/12/17/.

The above can be proven 100% with the evidence we currently have.

The proof will be easier to understand further along in the investigation and will be presented then.


« Last Edit: February 05, 2013, 02:12:44 PM by peter »

Offline peter

  • Administrator
  • Waitstaff
  • *****
  • Posts: 413
    • View Profile
Re: Exhibits presented in the investigation of the Sandy Hook School Shooting.
« Reply #18 on: February 06, 2013, 05:27:52 PM »
Quote
THIS EXHIBIT IS TO LET US MORE EASILY COMPARE THE IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ON THE TWO GOOGLE CACHE RECORDS

Below I have created images that summarize the important elements on the pages so both pages can easily be see in proximity to each other.

There are also links to the original screen captures of each page so you can easily verify that the important parts of those pages shown here are accurate.






To view the originals of these two documents click the icons below.

DOCUMENT 1
DOCUMENT 1
DOCUMENT 2
DOCUMENT 2




Offline Surly1

  • Administrator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 16291
    • View Profile
    • Doomstead Diner
Re: Exhibits presented in the investigation of the Sandy Hook School Shooting
« Reply #19 on: February 07, 2013, 02:23:42 PM »

Of possible interest. This is a LOT of inference from the sealing of records. And the INtel Hub is not the London Times. But nevertheless, it is something to consider.

Sandy Hook: Law Enforcement Officials Now Admit Possibility of Multiple Shooters
http://theintelhub.com/2013/02/07/sandy-hook-law-enforcement-now-admit-possibility-of-multiple-shooters/

In a shocking twist of events lending credence to theintelhub.com’s investigation, it has now been admitted by officials that there is a potential that multiple shooters carried out the bloody massacre that took place at the Sandy Hook Elementary School the morning of December 14, 2012.

By Shepard Ambellas
theintelhub.com
February 6, 2013

NEWTOWN — New information has now been brought forth by Connecticut State Attorney Stephen Sedensky, suggesting that records pertaining to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting have been sealed to possibly hide the identity of witnesses from multiple shooter suspects and that they should not be unsealed anytime soon.

Officials fear the safety of witnesses.

Now we are getting somewhere, after nearly two months this new information is startling.


Lt. Paul Vance

An article in the Digital Journal reports;

    Vance nor the CT Attorney General’s office have ever ruled out the possible presence of other suspects. The New Haven Register reports Vance as having said:

    “Whenever you conduct an investigation you don’t speculate as to where it’s going to take you, as I said, we’re going to look at every single thing, every piece of material and we’ll take it from there.”

    The CT State Attorney General’s Office is handling the investigation of the mass shooting, in which 20 children and 8 adults died last December 14th.

    The motion to extend the seal on the records for 90 days was granted by Superior Court Judge John Blawie, who wrote in his decision that:

    “The court finds that due to the nature and circumstances of this case and the ongoing investigation, the state’s interest in continuing nondisclosure substantially outweighs any right to public disclosure at this time,”

    The warrants were for searches, on different dates, of the Lanza home, and of Adam Lanza’s mother’s two cars. One of the cars, a 2010 black Honda Civic, was the vehicle which Lanza allegedly drove to the crime scene. The other, a 2009 silver BMW, was parked in the garage attached to the Lanza home. The court motion seals the affidavits stating what was found upon execution of the warrants for another 90 days, until late March.

Although I myself believe this could potentially be a staged release of information by officials, as something still doesn’t seem right.

Sources:

^Actual Lanza Warrant: Lanza warrant motion

^ Digital Journal Article: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/342829#ixzz2KADXs1TJ

^Montagraph:
Looks Like there are More Suspects ?
"It is difficult to write a paradiso when all the superficial indications are that you ought to write an apocalypse." -Ezra Pound

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
21 Replies
3612 Views
Last post January 28, 2013, 11:54:46 PM
by peter
0 Replies
281 Views
Last post June 10, 2016, 12:37:06 PM
by Eddie
0 Replies
685 Views
Last post July 04, 2019, 01:54:25 PM
by azozeo