AuthorTopic: Ciimate.....Just The Facts  (Read 69 times)

Offline K-Dog

  • Global Moderator
  • Sous Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
    • View Profile
    • K-Dog
Ciimate.....Just The Facts
« on: February 09, 2020, 04:36:45 PM »
BAU only requires the public to believe that dangerous global warming is decades away.  That global warming is on the burn can't be denied any longer and new denialist propaganda and its authors are adapting to the times.  All they have to do is kick the can down the road.

Consier this list:

Key elements of a sustainable energy future include:

  •     A substantial increase in energy efficiency
  •     A successful transition from conventional to renewable energy
  •     Maintenance of the earth's ecological systems and the life-supporting services they provide
  •     Equitable distribution of energy services to different segments of the population, both internationally and within nations.

It is not my list.  This is a list of new climate denialism.  It is a list that elite billionaires and anyone else committed to business as usual can love.

Highly sophisticate websites now proport to furnish detailed climate info that shows the earth won't reach 1.5 degrees C of warming for another 45 years.

Lets, see?

CarbonBrief which put  out this junk science and false technical statement:
Quote
The most common one used by the IPCC is something called ECS. ECS stands for Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity.  The rule of thumb being used these days is that for every doubling of CO2 we get a 3 degree rise in temperature .

Really ladies and gentlemen?  if global CO2 has to rise to over 800 ppm before we 3 degrees more warming lets all party on.

 :multiplespotting:

CarbonBrief

Is exclusively funded by:

https://europeanclimate.org/

which is funded by:

https://www.bloomberg.org/

Among others.

The list after I rework it.  Too bad I don't have billionaire funding.

Key elements of a sustainable energy future include:

  •     A substantial increase in energy efficiency coupled with rationing. 

    Jevon's theorem says this is the way it has to be or use accelerates.
  •     A successful transition from conventional to renewable energy.

    Means an end to global industrial civilization as we know it.  There is no other way.
  •     Maintenance of the earth's ecological systems and the life-supporting services they provide.

    Can only be done by a commitment to reducing population and by immediate arrest of all ongoing environmental destructions.
  •     Equitable distribution of energy services to different segments of the population, both internationally and within nations.

      This statement is added at the end because the enemy does it.  It always sounds so damn good.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2020, 05:57:00 PM by K-Dog »
Under ideal conditions of temperature and pressure the organism will grow without limit.

Offline K-Dog

  • Global Moderator
  • Sous Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
    • View Profile
    • K-Dog
Re: Ciimate.....Just The Facts
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2020, 06:11:29 PM »
Consider this place:

http://berkeleyearth.org/

Top of the list on the board of directors.

Elizabeth Muller - Elizabeth is the co-founder and Executive Director of Berkeley Earth, CEO of Muller & Associates LLC, and the Managing Partner of Global Shale.

You can google Global Shale yourself.  And that is only the start.




Under ideal conditions of temperature and pressure the organism will grow without limit.

Offline K-Dog

  • Global Moderator
  • Sous Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
    • View Profile
    • K-Dog
Re: Ciimate.....Just The Facts
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2020, 06:22:02 PM »
From CarbonBrief,

The important thing is to take in the data and make your own interpretation by thinking it out for yourself.

Quote
First, the remaining carbon budget for 1.5C is extremely small, equivalent to around eight years of current emissions. Coal is the single largest contributor to emissions today and it emits far more CO2 per unit of energy than oil or gas, so it must inevitably fall quickly to keep warming below 1.5C.

Part of the new game is to use good data for denial purposes when appropriate.

American coal plants are already being phased out.  How convenient!  With clean alternatives the message is that there is nothing to worry about.  Just get rid of coal.

Soon enough the part I put in glitter will be forgotten but concerned citizens will know:  Coal must go!  And BAU must go on.

« Last Edit: February 09, 2020, 06:33:43 PM by K-Dog »
Under ideal conditions of temperature and pressure the organism will grow without limit.

Offline K-Dog

  • Global Moderator
  • Sous Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
    • View Profile
    • K-Dog
Talking Humanely about Population
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2020, 09:56:09 AM »
Quote
…You could read a score of reports by bodies concerned with global problems – and see that population is clearly one of the drivers that underlies all of them – and yet find no reference to this obvious fact in any of them. … Break the taboo, in private and in public…. Wherever and whenever we speak of the environment – add a few words to ensure that the population element is not ignored.”         David Attenborough (1)




Talking Humanely about Population
  Max Kummerow

While the global population growth rate fell from 2% in 1970 to 1.1% in 2019, population meanwhile more than doubled from 3.5 billion to 7.8 billion. Global population increase, now larger than in 1970, continues at over 80 million per year, headed for 10 billion by mid-century.  Growth in human numbers and our ecological impact is still the elephant in the room, the issue that won’t go away without human choices and policies to cut birthrates.

Population is not the only issue of concern and interacts with others such as consumption, environmental protection and injustice. But population is fundamental, a multiplier of consumption. Attenborough concluded his talk cited above by saying that continued growth in human numbers makes other problems “more difficult and ultimately impossible to solve.”

During the 20th century, some countries’ fertility rates fell to below 1.5 (they got rich), while others remained above 6 (they stayed poor). In 2020, about 30 countries are losing population, about 90 have below replacement fertility rates. But over half of all humans still live in countries with above replacement fertility and hence continue exponential population growth. (Table 1)

“Population momentum” means growth continues for half a century even after birth rates fall. China, for example, fell well below replacement fertility (less than 2.1 children/woman) by the early 1980s, with population around 1 billion, but will not peak until 2030 at over 1.4 billion. It takes a long time to stop the Titanic, even with the engines reversed.

Table 1 The half-completed world fertility transition of 2020 (2)

From about 1965-1975, limiting growth of human population was accepted as essential across the political spectrum. Governments, foundations and individuals supported family planning initiatives. During the decade of the 1970s, global average birth rates dropped from 5 to 4 per woman. But then a backlash attacked the women’s movement, environmentalists and family planning. The 1994 Cairo UN conference on Population and Development abandoned family planning as an explicit goal. Neither the UN’s Millennium Development Goals nor subsequent Sustainable Development Goals mention population.

During the most recent decade, world average fertility rates only fell by about a tenth of a child/woman, with 44% of the world’s more than 200 million pregnancies per year unintended (3). Even talking about population seems toxic or taboo to many people and organizations.

A 2000 article by Beck and Kolankiewicz, “The Environmental Movement’s Retreat from Advocating U.S. Population Stabilization (1970–1998): A First Draft of History” (4) outlines opposition to family planning from the anti-regulation, pro-growth political right, from the radical left, from third-world anti-imperialists, from fundamentalists in all religions (5), from radical feminists and from advocates for immigrants.

The libertarian ideology of the Koch political organization and the Murdoch and Sinclair media empires shifted Americans from their New Deal era support for successful public programs including support for contraception (6). For people like Donald Trump, abandoning their former support for Planned Parenthood and legal abortion was a cynical way to win votes and advance an agenda of corporate deregulation and tax cuts for the wealthy.

Growth is good, so ending population growth must be bad according to the dominant ideology and incessant pro-growth, pro-consumption advertising messages. In market economies, firms prosper by finding more customers. They forget that more people also means more competitors, more intense competition and rising prices for inputs like land, energy and other scarce commodities.

The most effective “single issue” for the American oligarchy’s political agenda has been abortion. After Roe v Wade, organizers realized that they could win elections by repositioning abortion from “a procedure to give women their lives back when an unintended pregnancy happens and to prevent children from being raised in difficult circumstances” to “murder of an innocent potential human.” The power of this false message to inspire voter turnout paid off in trillion- dollar tax cuts under Reagan, G.W. Bush and Trump. And success for energy industry climate deniers. Falsehoods about abortion have been the key lever to gain power for an anti-science agenda. To pay off single-issue anti-abortion voters, these three presidents all cut family planning funding and sex education, even though education and contraceptives reduce abortion rates.

If we are going to talk about population again, how can we do it better this time? How can we deal with the backlash against legal abortion, women’s empowerment and thinking about the future? How can we unite divergent worldviews into a commonsense consensus on family planning?

Talking about population often doesn’t sound humane. There is no “right to life.” There is life if conditions exist where life can survive. Human history and pre-history recounts tales of famines, plagues, wars, torture, genocide, oppression and injustice. We do not live in the Garden of Eden. With too many people and unsustainable practices, populations collapse. At least 25 past societies grew for hundreds or thousands of years, then collapsed (7). Scientists and a Swedish teenager (8) are warning that current unsustainable trends project to a global collapse.

Darwin observed that life could not survive without evolving and could not evolve unless every species can produce more offspring than the environment can support. Individual variations allow survivors to be different from preceding generations and better adapted to new conditions. Natural selection keeps life viable as conditions change. It would be nice if all possible potential babies could survive, but that is not the world we live in. As the world gets more crowded beyond some sustainable optimum—which Paul Ehrlich estimated to be about 1 or 2 billion worldwide—then crowding, hunger, violence and cruelty increase while quality of life falls.

I witnessed extreme poverty and heartbreak associated with high birth rates in Brazil, Guatemala and the U.S. South. Infants with kwashiorkor, the horrible swollen belly protein deficiency syndrome. Margarida, one of her father’s 27 children, was raped and impregnated by an older neighbor at age 14. Her baby died of malnutrition and poor medical care. It’s hard to make such suffering into a feel-good story.

But we should instead emphasize good outcomes—ending hunger, prosperity, peace, women and children’s lives enriched—that have shown up where birth rates fell. We should talk more about low birth rates in Norway or Finland or Singapore where liberated women live long, prosperous peaceful lives and children thrive. With birth control and solar panels we have all the technology needed for a Green Utopia on a recovering planet. The future can, realistically, be good or bad. Our collective choice. Optimism is as reasonable as pessimism in the long run, if we can learn to live within our means by stopping growth.

Each country, culture and religion must find its own path to stable population. But it is a global problem. Population growth in poor, high fertility countries spills over into rich countries through mass immigration. Walls to keep misery out will eventually fail unless birth rates fall in countries that are sources of migrants. Rich countries that don’t want to accept more migrants should give family planning aid to poor countries to help keep their numbers in balance with local resources.

Talking humanely about population starts with some notion of how many total numbers of people are too many for ecosystems to support sustainably. We can debate optimum population levels and collectively choose to reduce population by lowering fertility or suffer the far more painful alternative of increasing mortality. Awareness of overpopulation’s negative ecological and human impacts at the national and global levels needs to become part of all cultures. Growth is not always good.

Talking humanely about designing wise policies to reduce overpopulation and restore ecosystems requires the following principles:

    Everyone has equal fundamental rights to reproduce. Policies designed to limit or increase total numbers of humans must apply equally to everyone (9).
    Genetic and cultural diversity are beneficial and enrich life so we should not only tolerate, but value other races, religions and ethnicities.
    Reproductive decisions depend on many institutions such as cultural norms, education, economic incentives, public policies, etc. Changing institutional “rules of the game” and persuasion can reduce (or increase) birth rates, while respecting human rights.
    At present there is more coercion, especially from husbands, families and social norms, pushing women to have children they don’t want than coercion to prevent them from having children. With the world in overshoot headed for collapse, women should be educated, enabled and encouraged to choose fewer children.
    Failures of contraceptives or failure to use contraceptives are the main sources of unwanted pregnancies and therefore the basic cause of abortions.
    Enhancement of freedom and opportunity for women and their children should guide policy. Empowerment of women and access to modern contraceptives reduce fertility rates.
    There is a valid community role in encouraging or discouraging childbearing because the collective outcomes of other people’s childbearing decisions affect our children’s life chances.
    Since all contraceptive methods have failure rates, and nearly half of all pregnancies are unintended, voluntary termination of pregnancies plays a key role in improving women and children’s lives. Equating abortion with murder is a falsehood.
    Overpopulation and divergent fertility rates are global problems. So long as anyplace continues exponential growth, eventually there will be too many people for the earth to support and conflict over scarce territory and resources.

Life does not begin at conception, but rather life began four billion years ago when DNA replicated. Survival of all possible conceptions is biologically impossible (10). Survival requires conditions that sustain life. The world will be a kinder better place with family planning and abortion than without them. Let’s think about the future, talk kindly and listen to each other.

References:

    RSA President’s Lecture 2011: People and Planet with Sir David Attenborough
    The statistics reported here are “total fertility rate” (TFR) a cross sectional statistic calculated by adding births across all fertile cohorts from age of puberty to age of menopause. “Completed cohort fertility” would require waiting until women reached the end of childbearing, so TFR is a better snapshot of fertility at a point in time.
    Unintended Pregnancy Rates Declined Globally from 1990 to 2014
    Beck, Roy and Leon Kolankiewicz. “The Environmental Movement’s Retreat from Advocating U.S. Population Stabilization (1970–1998): A First Draft of History” Journal of Policy History Volume 12, Issue 1 (Special Issue: Environmental Politics and Policy, 1960s–1990s) January 2000, pp. 123-156
    Eric Kaufman in Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth (Profile Books, London, 2010) presents data showing that in all religions (Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Judaism, etc.) fundamentalists tend to have higher fertility rates than more secular believers and atheists.”
    Most of what Americans know these days we were taught by expensive and expert propaganda. Books like Merchants of Doubt, Dark Money, Democracy in Chains and Shadow Network document the rise of organized efforts to deny science and win political power by use of propaganda techniques and the influence of money.
    Jared Diamond’s Collapse (Viking, 2004) and Joseph Tainter’s Collapse of Complex Societies (Cambridge University Press, 1988) describe over two dozen collapses from the ancient Middle East to Easter Island.
    There have been numerous “scientists’ warnings” by thousands of scientists, https://www.scientistswarning.org/. Greta Thunberg has become a global voice for future generations threatened by climate change.
    Where death rates differ or some groups are very few, fairness becomes more complicated. China’s One-Child policy allowed minorities to have up to three children. Real life is complicated, but the basic principle of equality matters where fundamental human rights are concerned.
    A woman is born with a million potential egg cells, with timeouts for pregnancies, she sheds one egg via ovulation each month for about 30 years, 350- 400 total. Each ejaculation contains tens of millions of sperm. Half of fertilized eggs (conceptions) fail to implant and are lost. Of pregnancies that do begin, 20% are lost to miscarriage. Of unintended pregnancies, additional millions are lost due to voluntary termination (abortion). In the highest fertility countries, over fifty out of one thousand live births die before age one. Before modern medicine, a third to half of all babies born died by age five and mortality continued high throughout life. We are all, sadly, born to die. There are more “unborn potential humans” than could possibly survive. If you are a believer, this is God’s plan. If you accept Darwin, it is how life came to thrive on earth. A good plan, but one where all possible individuals cannot survive.

I'll repeat this part:
Quote
Opposition to family planning from the anti-regulation, pro-growth political right, from the radical left, from third-world anti-imperialists, from fundamentalists in all religions, from radical feminists and from advocates for immigrants.

Stupidity is very popular.

https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/talking-humanely-about-population/

« Last Edit: February 11, 2020, 10:05:51 AM by K-Dog »
Under ideal conditions of temperature and pressure the organism will grow without limit.

Offline Surly1

  • Administrator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 17164
    • View Profile
    • Doomstead Diner
Re: Talking Humanely about Population
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2020, 02:50:59 PM »

I'll repeat this part:
Quote
Opposition to family planning from the anti-regulation, pro-growth political right, from the radical left, from third-world anti-imperialists, from fundamentalists in all religions, from radical feminists and from advocates for immigrants.

Stupidity is very popular.

https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/talking-humanely-about-population/

I must confess, I missed the "opposition to family planning" from the so-called "radical left," feminists, etc. Wondering if this happened in a weekend I took off?

The rest of the article made sense, but this phrase smacks of the "both-siderism" that is a bald-faced lie.
"Do not be daunted by the enormity of the world's grief. Do justly now, love mercy now, walk humbly now. You are not obligated to complete the work, but neither are you free to abandon it."

Offline K-Dog

  • Global Moderator
  • Sous Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
    • View Profile
    • K-Dog
Re: Talking Humanely about Population
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2020, 03:33:51 PM »

I'll repeat this part:
Quote
Opposition to family planning from the anti-regulation, pro-growth political right, from the radical left, from third-world anti-imperialists, from fundamentalists in all religions, from radical feminists and from advocates for immigrants.

Stupidity is very popular.

https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/talking-humanely-about-population/

I must confess, I missed the "opposition to family planning" from the so-called "radical left," feminists, etc. Wondering if this happened in a weekend I took off?

The rest of the article made sense, but this phrase smacks of the "both-siderism" that is a bald-faced lie.

I'll ask him.

Update:

I left a comment at the original article and quoted what you wrote.  I even suggested a theme for a response.  After the writer gets over the butthurt of having to explain himself something good may come of this.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2020, 03:50:54 PM by K-Dog »
Under ideal conditions of temperature and pressure the organism will grow without limit.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
418 Views
Last post June 27, 2016, 05:35:08 PM
by azozeo
18 Replies
2751 Views
Last post December 20, 2019, 04:21:20 AM
by Surly1
38 Replies
474 Views
Last post February 16, 2020, 09:58:01 PM
by K-Dog