AuthorTopic: Knarf's Knewz Channel  (Read 1332341 times)

Offline knarf

  • Global Moderator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 10597
    • View Profile
Illinois Judge Allows 11-Year-Old Girl To Use Medical Marijuana At School
« Reply #10455 on: January 13, 2018, 04:06:44 PM »

A medical marijuana patch on a patient's arm. Medical marijuana is legal in Illinois, but an 11-year-old girl who uses it to combat seizures had to get court approval to use it in school.

In a decision that may have sweeping effects, a judge has allowed an 11-year-old Illinois girl to use medical marijuana at school.

Medical marijuana is legal in Illinois, and it is against current law for students to use it in school or have school nurses administer it. Now, Ashley Surin is the sole exemption. She overcame a leukemia diagnosis at 2 years old with extensive chemotherapy, but some of her treatments eventually led to having semi regular seizures. Her mother, Maureen Surin, told NPR that since starting medical marijuana treatment, her seizures have immensely declined in number. "We're amazed with her progress," Surin said.

Her parents filed a lawsuit in federal court on Wednesday against Schaumburg School District 54 and the State of Illinois, claiming that the state's ban on taking the drug at school violates the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). On Friday, a judge ruled in their favor after hearing from the school district, which reportedly had concerns that its employees may be subject to legal penalties for helping Ashley with her medications.

"What people seem to misunderstand here is that medical marijuana is a prescription like any other drug," Glink said. "Prohibiting it in school would be the same as prohibiting other medications such as Ritalin, Adderall or Concerta."

Lawyers for the school district and attorney general's office will meet back in court next week to work on a long-term plan for Ashley and the school. Ashley uses a patch on her foot and an oil extract on her wrists. "No one's saying she wants to fire up a bong in math class," the judge said, reported the Chicago Tribune.

Medical marijuana is legal in 29 states, but only three — New Jersey, Maine, and Colorado — say schools must allow students to use their legal prescriptions in school. In Washington State, schools are not legally required to permit on-site medical marijuana use; instead, schools can decide themselves.

"Ashley cannot wait to return to school," Glink told NPR. "Now, that will happen on Tuesday."

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/13/577861945/illinois-judge-allows-11-year-old-girl-to-use-medical-marijuana-at-school?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news
HUMANS ARE STILL EVOLVING! Our communities blog is at https://openmind693.wordpress.com

Offline knarf

  • Global Moderator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 10597
    • View Profile
China to Plant New Forests the Size of Ireland This Year
« Reply #10456 on: January 13, 2018, 04:12:23 PM »
 China's government announced plans for a major reforestation project. The country aims to grow about 6.66 million hectares of new forests this year, an area roughly the size of Ireland.

The announcement was made last week by Zhang Jianlong, the head of China's State Forestry Administration, in an effort to shed the country's image as a major polluter and become a global environmental leader, the Telegraph reported.

China is the world's largest emitter and remains heavily dependent on coal, but the country has been cleaning up its act in recent years due to concerns over the impacts of air pollution and climate change.

The administration announced several forestry goals, which include increasing the country's forest coverage rate to 23 percent from 21.7 percent by the end of the decade. Then from 2020 to 2035, China plans to further boost the percentage of forest coverage to 26 percent.

"Companies, organizations and talent that specialize in greening work are all welcome to join in the country's massive greening campaign," Jianlong said. "Cooperation between government and social capital will be put on the priority list."

The new forest areas will be built in the northeast Hebei province, the Qinghai province in the Tibetan Plateau and in the Hunshandake Desert in Inner Mongolia.

Zhang said that China has spent more than 538 billion yuan (about $83 billion) on planting forests over the past five years, putting the country's total forest area to 208 million hectares.

According to Reuters, the government is also promoting an "ecological red line" program to force provinces and regions to restrict "irrational development" to curb construction near rivers, forests and national parks.

https://www.ecowatch.com/china-reforestation-project-2524893906.html?utm_source=EcoWatch+List&utm_campaign=0de8bcb641-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_49c7d43dc9-0de8bcb641-85986361
HUMANS ARE STILL EVOLVING! Our communities blog is at https://openmind693.wordpress.com

Offline knarf

  • Global Moderator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 10597
    • View Profile
In the Arctic, a song of less ice and more fire: Why the north is burning
« Reply #10457 on: January 13, 2018, 04:16:12 PM »
Not only are more fires starting in the north, they’re burning longer and consuming more ground once they do


Smoke rises from the Bogus Creek Fire in southwest Alaska in the summer of 2015.

There is a new normal in the north, climate scientists confirmed late last year. While average temperatures were relatively cool across the Arctic last summer, according to the Arctic Report Card, an annual compendium of peer-reviewed research on climate change and the north, the long-term trend remained the same.

Winter keeps coming North of 60, the authors report, but decade over decade it’s coming with warmer air, warmer water, less ice and, as it turns out, more fire.

Stock images of the warming north have been drilled into our collective psyche by this point. Melting glaciers, skinny bears and mushy tundra have all become something close to cliché. But to many, the idea of more fire — in the land of ice — may be new.

What it shouldn’t be is a surprise.

The relationship between fire and climate is “strongly nonlinear” in the north, the report says. But over time, the correlation is clear. When mean temperatures in July have exceeded 13.4 degrees over the past 30 years, the odds of fire have gone up significantly.

http://nationalpost.com/news/world/in-the-arctic-a-song-of-less-ice-and-more-fire-why-the-north-is-burning
HUMANS ARE STILL EVOLVING! Our communities blog is at https://openmind693.wordpress.com

Offline knarf

  • Global Moderator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 10597
    • View Profile
It shouldn't be taboo to criticize parents for having too many kids
« Reply #10458 on: January 13, 2018, 04:21:45 PM »
Celebrities Chip and Joanna Gaines took some heat for announcing they are pregnant with their fifth child


While many people might find the backlash unwarranted, it's actually a conversation we need to have in order to challenge our uncritical acceptance of the life-fulfillment-through-procreation story.

Chip and Joanna Gaines, stars of HGTV's Fixer Upper, were probably surprised at the backlash on social media last week that accompanied their announcement of baby number five. I was surprised too.

Not because I disagree with their critics, who admonished the couple for having too many kids, but rather because it's a sentiment so seldom heard in a society that generally celebrates procreation with almost militant cheerfulness.

While having a child or five is a very personal choice, it's also a choice that affects everyone who inhabits our planet. So while many people might find the backlash unwarranted, it's actually a conversation we need to have in order to challenge our uncritical acceptance of the life-fulfillment-through-procreation story.

Population control is a fraught topic, and carries with it associations with eugenics and other nasty historical events. But we still need to talk about it, and people who reacted strongly to the Gaines' pregnancy announcement know this on some level. It's not an exaggeration to say that the survival of our species depends on it.

In August of last year, New York Magazine published an article claiming we are living through a mass extinction. The article claimed that the earth will be uninhabitable within 100 years due to various consequences of climate change, food shortages and economic and political instability.

In fact, Stephen Hawking has encouraged humanity to find a new home within 100 years in order to survive. He cites "climate change, overdue asteroid strikes, epidemics and population growth" as reasons for this abbreviated timeline.

That said, I don't think the possibility of an asteroid hitting the earth is reason enough to abstain from procreating freely. But if by some miracle we do end up colonizing another planet within the next century, the logistics of transporting eight billion people are staggering, unless we also invent a Star Trek-style transporter. So let's lighten the load, friends.

But how?

The best way I know of to change attitudes is to have an open conversation about them. The fact that people are starting to react to those who have many children is great, but we need to go much further.
Alternatives to motherhood

Now, as a feminist, I tend to oppose any cultural conversation that involves telling a woman what to do with her body. But women have long been told that they need to have kids to have a meaningful life, and they are groomed for motherhood from a very early age.

But we don't often hear arguments for alternatives to motherhood. Women need to be presented with options for a fulfilling life that don't involve taking 20 years of their lives to care for offspring. Changing the narrative around motherhood should help to offset some of the cultural conditioning we receive throughout our lives.

In the global West, where the environmental footprint of one person is far larger than in developing nations, it's crucial that we begin to present all people with alternatives to the traditional nuclear family. This inevitably involves calling out people who have kids like they're going out of style.

Shame is a powerful tool for changing behaviour: it's how we introduce new and existing social conventions. It's unfortunate that Chip and Joanna bore the brunt of changing attitudes, but let's learn from the reaction and examine our own actions.


Changing the narrative around motherhood should help to offset some of the cultural conditioning we receive throughout our lives.

It's not OK to have five kids without once considering adoption. There are so many children in North America and beyond in need of loving homes, yet adoption rates in many areas are lagging.

I get that humankind's theoretical demise is not enough to justify abstaining from what is for many the most meaningful experience of a lifetime. But it's not theoretical. Climate change is getting measurably worse, populations are multiplying exponentially and economic inequality is not getting better. And to top it off, Prince is dead. Don't bring a child into this.

Procreation is becoming a global public health concern, rather than a personal decision. So when people do irresponsible things like having five children, we absolutely need to be calling them out.

And if the birth rate in Canada declines, so what? As old You-Know-Who cuts off aid to not-for-profits that educate on abortion, restricts immigration and stops sending money to countries that need it, we will have a steady supply of smart and talented immigrants. Their loss, our gain.

Anyway, here's wishing Chip and Joanna the best!

http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/chip-joanna-gains-pregnancy-1.4481165
HUMANS ARE STILL EVOLVING! Our communities blog is at https://openmind693.wordpress.com

Online RE

  • Administrator
  • Chief Cook & Bottlewasher
  • *****
  • Posts: 33726
    • View Profile
Re: Somewhere, Away From It All
« Reply #10459 on: January 13, 2018, 04:40:35 PM »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/PSZxmZmBfnU?list=RDPSZxmZmBfnU" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/PSZxmZmBfnU?list=RDPSZxmZmBfnU</a>
SAVE AS MANY AS YOU CAN

Offline Eddie

  • Administrator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 15809
    • View Profile
Re: It shouldn't be taboo to criticize parents for having too many kids
« Reply #10460 on: January 13, 2018, 05:27:20 PM »
Celebrities Chip and Joanna Gaines took some heat for announcing they are pregnant with their fifth child


While many people might find the backlash unwarranted, it's actually a conversation we need to have in order to challenge our uncritical acceptance of the life-fulfillment-through-procreation story.

Chip and Joanna Gaines, stars of HGTV's Fixer Upper, were probably surprised at the backlash on social media last week that accompanied their announcement of baby number five. I was surprised too.

Not because I disagree with their critics, who admonished the couple for having too many kids, but rather because it's a sentiment so seldom heard in a society that generally celebrates procreation with almost militant cheerfulness.

While having a child or five is a very personal choice, it's also a choice that affects everyone who inhabits our planet. So while many people might find the backlash unwarranted, it's actually a conversation we need to have in order to challenge our uncritical acceptance of the life-fulfillment-through-procreation story.

Population control is a fraught topic, and carries with it associations with eugenics and other nasty historical events. But we still need to talk about it, and people who reacted strongly to the Gaines' pregnancy announcement know this on some level. It's not an exaggeration to say that the survival of our species depends on it.

In August of last year, New York Magazine published an article claiming we are living through a mass extinction. The article claimed that the earth will be uninhabitable within 100 years due to various consequences of climate change, food shortages and economic and political instability.

In fact, Stephen Hawking has encouraged humanity to find a new home within 100 years in order to survive. He cites "climate change, overdue asteroid strikes, epidemics and population growth" as reasons for this abbreviated timeline.

That said, I don't think the possibility of an asteroid hitting the earth is reason enough to abstain from procreating freely. But if by some miracle we do end up colonizing another planet within the next century, the logistics of transporting eight billion people are staggering, unless we also invent a Star Trek-style transporter. So let's lighten the load, friends.

But how?

The best way I know of to change attitudes is to have an open conversation about them. The fact that people are starting to react to those who have many children is great, but we need to go much further.
Alternatives to motherhood

Now, as a feminist, I tend to oppose any cultural conversation that involves telling a woman what to do with her body. But women have long been told that they need to have kids to have a meaningful life, and they are groomed for motherhood from a very early age.

But we don't often hear arguments for alternatives to motherhood. Women need to be presented with options for a fulfilling life that don't involve taking 20 years of their lives to care for offspring. Changing the narrative around motherhood should help to offset some of the cultural conditioning we receive throughout our lives.

In the global West, where the environmental footprint of one person is far larger than in developing nations, it's crucial that we begin to present all people with alternatives to the traditional nuclear family. This inevitably involves calling out people who have kids like they're going out of style.

Shame is a powerful tool for changing behaviour: it's how we introduce new and existing social conventions. It's unfortunate that Chip and Joanna bore the brunt of changing attitudes, but let's learn from the reaction and examine our own actions.


Changing the narrative around motherhood should help to offset some of the cultural conditioning we receive throughout our lives.

It's not OK to have five kids without once considering adoption. There are so many children in North America and beyond in need of loving homes, yet adoption rates in many areas are lagging.

I get that humankind's theoretical demise is not enough to justify abstaining from what is for many the most meaningful experience of a lifetime. But it's not theoretical. Climate change is getting measurably worse, populations are multiplying exponentially and economic inequality is not getting better. And to top it off, Prince is dead. Don't bring a child into this.

Procreation is becoming a global public health concern, rather than a personal decision. So when people do irresponsible things like having five children, we absolutely need to be calling them out.

And if the birth rate in Canada declines, so what? As old You-Know-Who cuts off aid to not-for-profits that educate on abortion, restricts immigration and stops sending money to countries that need it, we will have a steady supply of smart and talented immigrants. Their loss, our gain.

Anyway, here's wishing Chip and Joanna the best!

http://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/chip-joanna-gains-pregnancy-1.4481165

I know evangelicals who have a dozen kids. Celebrities who accept the karma of fame have to put up with public opinion. Less public people can do what they want and nobody gets to vote on it.

So what if they have five kids? I'd rather see five kids raised in a loving home by two parents with plenty to eat, here in the USA, than six kids raised by Nigerians looking to get a raft ride across the Mediterranean. That's the AVERAGE number of children there, fwiw.
What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well.

Online RE

  • Administrator
  • Chief Cook & Bottlewasher
  • *****
  • Posts: 33726
    • View Profile
Re: It shouldn't be taboo to criticize parents for having too many kids
« Reply #10461 on: January 13, 2018, 05:34:48 PM »
I know evangelicals who have a dozen kids. Celebrities who accept the karma of fame have to put up with public opinion. Less public people can do what they want and nobody gets to vote on it.

So what if they have five kids? I'd rather see five kids raised in a loving home by two parents with plenty to eat, here in the USA, than six kids raised by Nigerians looking to get a raft ride across the Mediterranean. That's the AVERAGE number of children there, fwiw.

If you want a real treat, go visit the thread on r/collapse Knarf pulled this link from and read the comment stream.  The Nihilists & Misanthropes are out in force.

https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/7q519f/it_shouldnt_be_taboo_to_criticize_parents_for/

My stream is at the bottom and minimized.  I've been downvoted to oblivion. -8 last I checked.  lol.

RE
SAVE AS MANY AS YOU CAN

Online Surly1

  • Administrator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 14110
    • View Profile
    • Doomstead Diner
Re: It shouldn't be taboo to criticize parents for having too many kids
« Reply #10462 on: January 13, 2018, 05:39:17 PM »

I know evangelicals who have a dozen kids. Celebrities who accept the karma of fame have to put up with public opinion. Less public people can do what they want and nobody gets to vote on it.

I agree with you. My wife is one of a family of 10, and at a wake, there are 150-200 people in attendance. That Irish-German Roman Catholic model is out of favor these days in many precincts, because who can afford that many kids? Her own father worked two or three jobs most of his life.

The evangelicals subscribe to the "Quiverfull" movement. Women in the ‘Quiverfull’ movement are kept at home -- away from the evils of feminism -- where they birth armies of God’s soldiers.

Quote
They borrow their name from Psalm 127: "Like arrows in the hands of a warrior are sons born in one's youth. Blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them. They will not be put to shame when they contend with their enemies in the gate." Quiverfull mothers think of their children as no mere movement but as an army they're building for God.
https://www.culteducation.com/group/936-christian-fundamentalists/7405-evangelical-groups-motto-breed-to-succeed.html

In part this is a response to changing demographics. Evangelicals home-school their families, attend fundamentalist churches and follow biblical guidelines of male headship -- "Father knows best" -- and female submissiveness. They refuse any attempt to regulate pregnancy. It remains to be seen how this unwinds as a social force.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2018, 05:58:51 PM by Surly1 »
"It is difficult to write a paradiso when all the superficial indications are that you ought to write an apocalypse." -Ezra Pound

Online Surly1

  • Administrator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 14110
    • View Profile
    • Doomstead Diner
Re: It shouldn't be taboo to criticize parents for having too many kids
« Reply #10463 on: January 13, 2018, 05:51:26 PM »
I know evangelicals who have a dozen kids. Celebrities who accept the karma of fame have to put up with public opinion. Less public people can do what they want and nobody gets to vote on it.

So what if they have five kids? I'd rather see five kids raised in a loving home by two parents with plenty to eat, here in the USA, than six kids raised by Nigerians looking to get a raft ride across the Mediterranean. That's the AVERAGE number of children there, fwiw.

If you want a real treat, go visit the thread on r/collapse Knarf pulled this link from and read the comment stream.  The Nihilists & Misanthropes are out in force.

https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/7q519f/it_shouldnt_be_taboo_to_criticize_parents_for/

My stream is at the bottom and minimized.  I've been downvoted to oblivion. -8 last I checked.  lol.

RE

-9 now. But I upvoted you. You are correct.

Quote from: RE
Cue the Nihilists and Misanthropes. Here we go again. I need to keep responses to these threads on file for copy/pasting. I'll make it short this time. Reproduction is a biological imperative necessary for perpetuation of a species. Not having kids is not an option unless you want to voluntarily force extinction.

People are crazy. Of course, by now you are probably a well-known Judas goat on r/collapse.
"It is difficult to write a paradiso when all the superficial indications are that you ought to write an apocalypse." -Ezra Pound

Online RE

  • Administrator
  • Chief Cook & Bottlewasher
  • *****
  • Posts: 33726
    • View Profile
Re: It shouldn't be taboo to criticize parents for having too many kids
« Reply #10464 on: January 13, 2018, 05:51:42 PM »

I know evangelicals who have a dozen kids. Celebrities who accept the karma of fame have to put up with public opinion. Less public people can do what they want and nobody gets to vote on it.

I agree with you. My wife is one of a family of 10, and at a wake, there are 150-200 people in attendance. That Irish-German Roman Catholic model is out of favor these days in many precincts, because who can afford that many kids? Her own father worked two or three jobs most of his life.

The evangelicals subscribe to the "Quiverfull" movement. Women in the ‘Quiverfull’ movement are kept at home -- away from the evils of feminism -- where they birth armies of God’s soldiers.

Quote
They borrow their name from Psalm 127: "Like arrows in the hands of a warrior are sons born in one's youth. Blessed is the man whose quiver is full of them. They will not be put to shame when they contend with their enemies in the gate." Quiverfull mothers think of their children as no mere movement but as an army they're building for God.
[/size]
https://www.culteducation.com/group/936-christian-fundamentalists/7405-evangelical-groups-motto-breed-to-succeed.html

In part this is a response to changing demographics. Evangelicals home-school their families, attend fundamentalist churches and follow biblical guidelines of male headship -- "Father knows best" -- and female submissiveness. They refuse any attempt to regulate pregnancy. It remains to be seen how this unwinds as a social force.

In our current society, 10 kids is a bit of overkill. lol.  Child mortality is low, you don't need that much insurance.  Also, as long as SS holds up, you don't need your kids to support you in your dotage.  Now, YOU have to support THEM on your SS Mailbox Money!  A SS check won't go far feeding 10 kids and all those grandkids. lol.

However, as I try to point out on r/collapse, procreation is a biological imperative to perpetuate the species.  If you are against procreation, then you are promoting voluntary self-extinction of the species.  This message is not well received on r/collapse. lol.

RE
SAVE AS MANY AS YOU CAN

Online Surly1

  • Administrator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 14110
    • View Profile
    • Doomstead Diner
Re: It shouldn't be taboo to criticize parents for having too many kids
« Reply #10465 on: January 13, 2018, 05:57:19 PM »

In our current society, 10 kids is a bit of overkill. lol.  Child mortality is low, you don't need that much insurance. 

Interestingly, most of the adult children of that family of 10 have had 1-3 children, underlining your point. Also, the Catholic prohibition against birth control is now null and void, as opposed to 60 years ago.

However, as I try to point out on r/collapse, procreation is a biological imperative to perpetuate the species.  If you are against procreation, then you are promoting voluntary self-extinction of the species.  This message is not well received on r/collapse. lol.

RE

Been a while since I dropped in. Quite a room.
"It is difficult to write a paradiso when all the superficial indications are that you ought to write an apocalypse." -Ezra Pound

Online RE

  • Administrator
  • Chief Cook & Bottlewasher
  • *****
  • Posts: 33726
    • View Profile
Re: It shouldn't be taboo to criticize parents for having too many kids
« Reply #10466 on: January 13, 2018, 05:58:33 PM »
People are crazy. Of course, by now you are probably a well-known Judas goat on r/collapse.

I've got a full squadron of enemies trolling my posting.  :icon_sunny:

However, I have mended fences with the mods, and they recently took some of my advice to squash the racists who are migrating to the board from Zero Hedge and The Burning Platform.

It's a kind of fun battleground, although the Millenials are fucking IDIOTS! lol.  Still, it's good to get a perspective from them, all we got here are old fogeys.

RE
SAVE AS MANY AS YOU CAN

Offline knarf

  • Global Moderator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 10597
    • View Profile
Passenger plane skids off runway in Turkey and gets stuck in mud on cliff edge
« Reply #10467 on: January 14, 2018, 03:48:11 AM »
Panicked passengers scream as the aircraft nosedives off a coast and is left dangling precariously on a cliff face near the sea.


he aircraft crashed off the runway after landing in the Turkish province of Trabzon

A passenger jet has skidded off a runway and got stuck in the mud on the edge of a cliff in northern Turkey.

"We tilted to the side, the front was down while the plane's rear was up. There was panic; people shouting, screaming," one of the passengers, Fatma Gordu, told state-run news agency Anadolu.

Dramatic images showed the white aircraft left dangling precariously on the steep, muddy cliff face against the backdrop of the crystal clear waters of the Black Sea.

All 162 passengers and crew, who were on board the aircraft when it overshot the runway and nosedived downhill, were evacuated safely by emergency services. No one was hurt.


A Pegasus Airlines aircraft is pictured after it skidded off the runway at Trabzon airport by the Black Sea in Turkey

The Pegasus Airline's Boeing 737 was flying from the Turkish capital Ankara to Trabzon Airport when it ended up careering off the runway on Sunday.

It is not yet known what caused the plane to skid off onto the cliff face.

The local governor, Yucel Yavuz, said an investigation had been launched into the incident - which Pegasus Airlines described in a statement as a "runway excursion".

The airport, situated in the Turkish province of the same name, was closed for several hours afterwards but has since reopened.

https://news.sky.com/story/plane-skids-off-runway-and-gets-stuck-in-mud-on-cliff-edge-in-turkey-11207458

HUMANS ARE STILL EVOLVING! Our communities blog is at https://openmind693.wordpress.com

Offline knarf

  • Global Moderator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 10597
    • View Profile
U.S. resumes DACA applications after judge blocks end to program
« Reply #10468 on: January 14, 2018, 03:50:37 AM »
(Reuters) - U.S. immigration authorities said on Saturday that it will resume accepting requests under a program that shields young people brought to the United States illegally from deportation after a court order blocked a government decision to end the program.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said on its website that people who previously received a grant of protection under the Deferred Action of Childhood Arrivals (DACA) may apply for a renewal under the terms in place before it was rescinded in September.

The announcement comes after a U.S. judge on Thursday temporarily blocked a decision by President Donald Trump to end DACA later this year. Congress is debating whether or not to write new legislation that would grant legal status to these immigrants that were brought to the U.S. as children and remain illegally.

Former President Barack Obama enacted DACA to keep the undocumented immigrants, known as dreamers, from being deported.

The immigration office said that deferments under DACA do not confer legal residency but gives prosecutors discretion on enforcing immigration laws.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration/u-s-resumes-daca-applications-after-judge-blocks-end-to-program-idUSKBN1F306B
HUMANS ARE STILL EVOLVING! Our communities blog is at https://openmind693.wordpress.com

Offline knarf

  • Global Moderator
  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 10597
    • View Profile
Chinese police dynamite Christian megachurch
« Reply #10469 on: January 14, 2018, 03:55:11 AM »
Hong Kong: Chinese police officers have demolished one of the country's largest evangelical churches this week, using heavy machinery and dynamite to raze the building where more than 50,000 Christians worshipped.

The Golden Lampstand Church in Shanxi province in mainland China was one of at least two Christian churches demolished by authorities in recent weeks, part of what critics describe as a national effort to regulate spiritual life in China.


People watch the demolition of the Golden Lampstand Church in Linfen. Activists says the church had clashed with the government.

Under President Xi Jinping, the government has destroyed churches or removed their steeples and crosses as part of a campaign that reflects the Communist Party's long-standing fear that Christianity, viewed as a Western philosophy, is a threat to the party's authority.

Global Times, a state newspaper, described the building's destruction as part of a "citywide campaign to remove illegal buildings," and quoted an unidentified official as saying that the church had been "secretly" constructed without proper permits and was initially disguised as a warehouse.


The Golden Lampstand Church in Linfen, in 2009.

Members of the megachurch, however, have previously clashed with authorities, including in 2009 when the police confiscated Bibles and imprisoned several of the congregation's leaders.

On Tuesday, officers of the People's Armed Police, a state paramilitary organisation, detonated explosives in the church's underground sanctuary and destroyed the rest of the building, according to ChinaAid, a US watchdog group that monitors religious freedom in China.

"The repeated persecution of Golden Lampstand Church demonstrates that the Chinese government has no respect for religious freedom or human rights," said Bob Fu, the group's founder.

ChinaAid said that the building was built by married evangelists Wang Xiaoguang and Yang Rongli with nearly $4 million in contributions from local Christians, but that it had never been registered with authorities, a legal requirement.

Officially, Chinese citizens are free to practise the religion of their choice, but the government tightly controls spiritual life.

On December 27, authorities also demolished a Catholic church in Shaanxi province, according to ChinaAid.

More than 60 million Christians live in China, at least half of whom worship in unregistered churches.

https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/asia/chinese-police-dynamite-christian-megachurch-20180113-h0hujr.html
HUMANS ARE STILL EVOLVING! Our communities blog is at https://openmind693.wordpress.com