AuthorTopic: Why the future for a healthy human species is local not global  (Read 2663 times)

Offline Slogger

  • Bussing Staff
  • **
  • Posts: 72
    • View Profile
Why the future for a healthy human species is local not global
« on: January 23, 2015, 01:02:55 AM »

Off the keyboard of John Ward


Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666

Friend us on Facebook


Published on The Slog on January 22, 2015


Packed like sardines


Discuss this article at the Kitchen Sink inside the Diner


There are far too many of us.


I must’ve written the assertion here a hundred times over the last seven years, and every month the problems of that reality become more and more obvious.


To be clear about it, this is not some scientific equation point I’m trying to make. It’s not about land and air and population expansion: that’s a pointless debate that goes round in circles: I do think water is a vital resource and will become a key geopolitical factor in the future unless governments wake up, but this isn’t an eco-conservation wonk plea. It’s about pack-size and complexity – about the fundamentals of social anthropology.


The sheer size and population of contemporary western Sovereign States today means that individual choice and freedom are shrinking, literally, day by day. It leads to, among other things, a dilution of the sense of personal responsibility and worth, a one-size-fits-all attitude to medical diagnosis and treatment, education, welfare and manufacturing, and a self-serving élite following its own agendas rather than observing and then fulfilling citizen needs.


The ‘mass and class’ structure of the ‘modern’ State model in turn forces the need for mass communication – of news, products and services – and a profitability of the media set thus nurtured that leads to  inordinate power for the owners of those media. More recently, the explosion of the internet and expansion of “24/7 news” has led to less and less analysis of what’s going on, and a much more crowded information environment in which it is frighteningly easy to obfuscate, mislead, and lie about reality. A classic example of this is the myth of ‘choice’ – more channels on TV, more internet content, product segmentation, more political Parties, more ways to buy stuff online – where, on cool assessment, very clearly the real quality of what’s on offer has been reduced to almost zero: everything is formulaic and derivative, and even in hitech there’s no real leap…just more apps and constant updates.


Most significant of all is that the very complexity of the State model has led to the rise of neoliberal socio-economic policies, within which the need to address expensive complexity is removed but the fundamentals of State structure remain. This is the worst of all worlds: one where reduced welfare and wages lead to increased time starvation, community involvement falls, the time available for parenting declines, and government becomes increasingly inaccessible. All these combine to nurture a sense of bitter, alienated resentment among the populace. Communitarianism, ironically, is replaced by systemic tribalism. Debate deteriorates into slanging matches. Society lacks a coherent set of shared values.


And in a purely economic sense, the system based on permanent consumption implodes because not enough citizens can afford to consume.


With 24/7 news, hundreds of TV channels, millions of websites and portable access to information has come a further stage in personal isolation. Families no longer eat together, or even watch telly together: they stare at screens, tap keyboards, send texts, take calls, Skype distant contacts and emit often inane tweets.


Far from realising the dysfunctional nature of this construct, those whom governmental complexity has attracted (for it is a wonderful place to hide) bring engorged egos with them. These in turn develop multiple supermarketing, out-of-town shopping, lowest-price manufacturing, one Europe, one dominant petrodollar currency, one brand name of soft drink worldwide, and – by force majeur as much as anything else – one system of globalist mercantilism alongside interconnected banking “to which there is no alternative because it is the future”.


Those of us who are awake know what’s coming. Those in charge either don’t (a surprisingly large number don’t) or do – and are ensuring the door closes on their helicopter once they’re in it. (There is an entire echelon in China ready to leave at a moment’s notice once the corruption show-trials start.) Either way, more thinking, intelligent people need to step back and take an essentially apolitically cold look at what the Nation State and its supra-State ambitions have brought us to.


In summary, they have delivered an arts sector devoid of genuinely creative and challenging work. A lifestyle that a majority of people, for myriad reasons, find profoundly unfulfilling. A lack of investment in energy research that locks us all into the dangerous geopolitics of oil. The near-collapse of over twenty major economies. Astronomical debt. A perverted set of banking practices and ethics. A Europe that has returned to the unstable squabbling of the past. Widespread – and growing – limits to freedom of speech. And divisive cynicism about aims and motives.


At times, the loss of plot by ruling élites seems almost epidemiological. Dangerous confrontations in the Middle East and Ukraine. Anarchy and potential civil war in south eastern Europe. Education systems that turn out robotic acceptors rather than sceptical analysts. And – due to the insidious influence of privileged money on the political process – an Establishment that serves multinational tax-evaders, crooked bankers, shady oligarchs, tribal minority interests, media moguls and the grand designs of paranoid snoopers long before it gives any thought at all to those millions and millions of faceless individuals who are supposed to be represented through the democratic system.


And the more of us there are to ‘serve’, the easier it will be to govern – because the complexity and confusion I examine above leads to the resentment, fear, divisive politics and tribalism that remove effective opposition. But the security services deliberately offer the opposing view: that sixty million people are bound to harbour secret groups with secret plans to destabilise the State to which there is no alternative. So they must expand GCHQ, and spend £15bn every year to watch, listen to and read everything we say, write or broadcast. The internet ISPs already offering marketing the chance to sell by individual and aperture with hour by hour changes to the mix are keen to cooperate with Intelligence services. And risibly named ‘social networks’ fill in any gaps that are left.


The social networks and the blogosphere seem to me increasingly there to serve perhaps the most obvious symptom of a mentally ill culture: the desire to talk about oneself and, by one means or another, create a certain sort of fame – vicariously through others, or perhaps in a niche.


What has narcissistic celebrity obsession got to do with too large a pack size? Put simply, if you turn every citizen into a small frogspawn in a gigantic lake too cold for it to hatch, every frogspawn will want to be a frustrated not-frog. And if they can’t be a frog, they’ll fantasise about being the most famous frog in the lake. Only in the small, warm pond can he or she develop naturally to become a responsible adult with a balanced sense of scale.


A key word in that paragraph is naturally. So utterly have we been removed from a natural environment over the last fifty years – with an acceleration after 1980 – I sense that the only way some citizens can deal with it is by vigorous, almost autistic, assertion over and over again that unnatural is better than natural. From this desire to feel ‘normal’ in a culture of increasingly abnormal lives – crowded trains, long hours, endless traffic jams, casual affairs, binge drinking, lack of communal intercourse, incessant litigation – comes support for political correctness, swopped gender responsibilities, extreme feminism…and above all, denial.


It is denial that has given us an enormous and expanding Underclass, the desire to pillory opportunist men as rapists and paedophiles, 24/7 drink laws, huge imported cells of Islamist jihadism where no GCHQ at all is required to see them, ludicrous targeting in education and welfare, the belief that the private sector can be trusted when working for government, multiculturalism, endlessly repeated (but groundless) accusations of systemic racism and/or misogyny, reclassification of asking for a date as sexual harassment, and an island so overpopulated yet ideologically blinkered, the only solution on offer is to build even more domiciles to house them.


In a culture of ‘settled social science’, there are no new ideas. In an economic system that values only share prices and short term ROI, there are no risks that lead to innovation. After an education where only one question is asked by the student – “Is it on the syllabus?”, there is no search for The Better Way – and ultimately, no exercise for the voyager gene. A political environment in which the Left and Right duopoly continues to dominate merely reflects the culture it has helped create: but of course, the culture it helped create protects it in almost every way. Checkmate.


Pretty much every major European city now has ‘villages’….and in those villages live tribes: stockbrokers, gays, liberals, media executives, MPs – even activists. These reflect the natural human desire to be among those with whom we feel an affinity. The most enduring south east English trend of the last fifty years has been the desire to leave London’s mass-race to be King Rat, and spend more time among green things where the horizon is visible. Study after study shows:


* lower levels of crime in smaller communities


* stronger cultures in smaller companies


* the growth of mutualism as the preferred business start-up


* higher achievements in smaller class sizes


* improved educational diligence among stable families


* cynicism towards central government


* the rejection of Supra-State solutions


* growing gaps between rich and poor in large, neoliberally run societies.


But now comes the core problem: perhaps somewhere in the region of 3% of the population would reject all or most of the observations I’ve made in this piece….and wilfully ignore the research mentioned above.


Sadly, they run everything.


Yet the only alternative to the scaled-down, communitarian and more localised mutual entrepreneuralism we need is a mass cull. Because central government trying to employ, look after, listen to and police the sick, mass culture we’ve inherited is hugely expensive.


What the current top tier seem to conclude in that context is, “OK then, we won’t bother”. Which is a solution, I suppose. Under that solution, orders of water-cannon and portable crowd-control railings do well. But what England, ClubMed, 11 States in America and dozens of other overblown human units have discovered is that doing everything on the one hand or far too little on the other simply fails – in different ways, but the failure is equally cataclysmic: debt that enslaves the State, or social unrest that lets in the fascists.


There are far too many of us.


There are far too many of us to put into one unit and hope it will be homogenous: those days are long-gone. Even in Greece (where the population is under 1 million) hundreds of thousands of young people are leaving to find something better elsewhere.


But there are not far too many of us to the extent that we need a planetary cull. Not at all: what we need is massively scaled down central government from which all unelected, monied influence has been removed…and power devolved to interlinked communities where people can build self-esteem by having a say…or (if they want to do other stuff, as most do) being a name with responsibilities…not a number with an unquenchable thirst for license.


License in the end leads to a top-down system in which everyone needs a licence before they can do anything. Not for nothing are we now being told that, on top of the Birth and Death certificate, we must (six times repeated on the form) have a Life Certificate.


There is so much more to this issue than liberty and democracy. One can’t any longer sloganise the need for the duo, because the minorities taking them away don’t care if we do. It is every bit as much about self-esteem, neighbourly camaraderie, taking responsibility, gaining fulfillment from work and family, developing scepticism where there is now only cynicism…and earning the right to be left alone by those who have no business snooping into your business.


If there’s a vacuum where self-discipline used to be, untrammeled power will fill it very quickly. We can blame ‘Them’ until the cows come home. The answer lies in our hands.


And no, it’s not my job to tell you how to get there. It’s your job to think about it.


Thank you for persevering with this longer-than-usual piece.



Offline Petty Tyrant

  • Cannot be Saved
  • Sous Chef
  • *
  • Posts: 4573
    • View Profile
Re: Why the future for a healthy human species is local not global
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2015, 02:48:26 AM »
I call this inspired writing, and inspiring. 5 Stars!
ELEVATE YOUR GAME

Offline Louise

  • Dishwasher
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Why the future for a healthy human species is local not global
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2015, 09:37:42 AM »

Does a Natural Human Environment have assigned gender responsibilities? It would seem that the most efficient manner of organizing a small community is to assign tasks  to the individual who is best fit to perform it...... 

How does the author think wealth distribution is handled in a "Natural Human Local Environment"?
 
The article left me questioning  the power/authority (having discovered I suffer from Authority Defiance Disorder.... on ZH the other night) and decision making for the local community in a "Natural Human Environment"....... 

The author states.... "So utterly have we been removed from a natural environment over the last fifty years – with an acceleration after 1980 ..."

So is he saying the American society that existed 50 years ago had some semblance of a Natural Human Environment......  WTF!!!!!!  (I feel "RE Rant" overtaking me........ I could pick "the wings off of this fly in the dark.....".)

The writer goes on to say...... "endlessly repeated (but groundless) accusations of systemic racism and/or misogyny, reclassification of asking for a date as sexual harassment, "

OK..... time to "call bullshit", creditability of author is destroyed...... Written by a OAWM........ (Old Angry White Man syndrome...........)




Offline Petty Tyrant

  • Cannot be Saved
  • Sous Chef
  • *
  • Posts: 4573
    • View Profile
Re: Why the future for a healthy human species is local not global
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2015, 01:18:14 PM »

Does a Natural Human Environment have assigned gender responsibilities?

Do you mean like childbirth and brazilian waxing women?

 It would seem that the most efficient manner of organizing a small community is to assign tasks  to the individual who is best fit to perform it......

Are you saying a woman with a baby on the breast and another in the belly should stand back and let the 6 foot 240lb testosterone laden lads lift heavy things including the corpses of attackers?

How does the author think wealth distribution is handled in a "Natural Human Local Environment"?

Im guessing by earning.
 
The article left me questioning  the power/authority (having discovered I suffer from Authority Defiance Disorder.... on ZH the other night) and decision making for the local community in a "Natural Human Environment"....... 

if you were diagnosed with Oppositional Defiant Disorder, not Authority Defiant Disorder (ZH got everything about it wrong), you would  be an 11-17 year old boy who destroys property, disrupts classes and nobody wants. Those are the only people who get given the diagnosis by anyone qualified to make it. This simply qualifies the boy for additional funding and disability payments. He can have an inclusion support assistant so he can attend school etc. As an adult the same behavior not any opinion you have that qualifies you as ODD CONDUCT Disorder only qualifies you to get charged with criminal offences, and many such youths suddenly discover it within their power to control their behavior.



The author states.... "So utterly have we been removed from a natural environment over the last fifty years – with an acceleration after 1980 ..."

So is he saying the American society that existed 50 years ago had some semblance of a Natural Human Environment......  WTF!!!!!!  (I feel "RE Rant" overtaking me........ I could pick "the wings off of this fly in the dark.....".)

Did you know your neighbors 50 years ago, or even earlier in the 70's prior to 1980, were you all threatening or trying to sue each other all the time, or sorting things out yourselves?

The writer goes on to say...... "endlessly repeated (but groundless) accusations of systemic racism and/or misogyny, reclassification of asking for a date as sexual harassment, "

OK..... time to "call bullshit", creditability of author is destroyed...... Written by a OAWM........ (Old Angry White Man syndrome...........)

Why ?
« Last Edit: January 23, 2015, 01:23:33 PM by Uncle Bob »
ELEVATE YOUR GAME

Offline Eddie

  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 19728
    • View Profile
Re: Why the future for a healthy human species is local not global
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2015, 01:27:44 PM »
So is he saying the American society that existed 50 years ago had some semblance of a Natural Human Environment...

For starters, John Ward is a Brit, and his POV isn't American.  But my own view is that American society until WWII might have left a lot to be desired in many respects, but was NO DOUBT much more resilient, and the way of life was more sustainable than it is now, primarily because most people were engaged in agriculture, and most of our food production was very local. And generally, people were much more engaged in local community than they are now.

The Great Depression started the exodus from the family farm, and the war speeded it up even more, and Big Agriculture killed what was left  over the course of my lifetime, which is to say the last sixty years or so.

I get what you're saying about the OAWM Syndrome, and you're probably right about that. However, the joy of going local includes the possibility of surrounding oneself with other people who might share your same sensibilities with regards to what's appropriate with regards to gender responsibilities, spiritual path, education, and a host of other areas where we now have to be "one size fits all". You can go local without buying into John Ward's particular ethos.

 I do understand some of John's frustration with our current culture with it's stated goals of diversity, multiculturalism, equality, feminism, and so forth. It isn't so much that those are bad goals. It's just that these perceived entitlements have, to some degree, been weaponized and used to further splinter ordinary people into various armed camps organized against each other.

For instance, I have three daughters who attended the university, and I have been very concerned about the culture of sexual predation that I believe does exist on some college campuses. But I think that a law like California's "yes means yes" legislation is approaching theater of the absurd. It's one more case of trying to solve a real problem and probably making it worse through legislation, when the best way to deal with the problem is ignored, because the perpetrators of college rape tend to be the pampered children of the rich and upper middle class, and that rape has been institutionalized, more or less, through the way college administrators have allowed Greek Letter Societies on campus to run amok.

And whatever good things one can attribute to feminism, there most definitely can be some negative effects, on men, on women, and on the family unit. i do believe in equal rights and equal pay. But I don't believe women can effectively replace men as the head of the family, anymore than I think I could make a good mother to a small child. Are there all kinds of families that work? Sure there are, and I have no problem with any arrangement that does work...but there's a lot to be said for the traditional family unit, which I think we need to preserve.

Am I making sense to you? I certainly don't want to come off an Old Angry White Man myself, because I respect women, depend on the support of strong women in my own life, and I respect people who are different from me, whatever that might mean, whether they might be of a different ethnicity, a different skin color (in my book there's only one human race), or gay, or whatever.

« Last Edit: January 23, 2015, 01:41:23 PM by Eddie »
What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well.

Offline RE

  • Administrator
  • Chief Cook & Bottlewasher
  • *****
  • Posts: 42013
    • View Profile
Re: Why the future for a healthy human species is local not global
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2015, 01:04:01 AM »
OK..... time to "call bullshit", creditability of author is destroyed...... Written by a OAWM........ (Old Angry White Man syndrome...........)

Yes, I think John Ward definitely fits the OAWM Pidgeon Hole.  :icon_mrgreen:

He's a lot like Jim Kunstler, he has a memory of a Ozzie & Harriet world of the 1950s-60s where in the mind of a child, everything seemed to WORK.  If we could only return to this time of Innocence & Opportunity, all would be well again.  The Mom & Pop Hardware store, Women as Housewives, Buses and Trains for most people and Carz for only a very few, kids playing Baseball/Cricket in the Sandlots not sitting in the Basement playing Grand Theft Auto on the X-Box, wasn't life back then WONDERFUL?

Fact is of course the 50s saw the Korean War and the McCarthy era purges, and the 60s as we all know were a nonstop series of local political dislocation as well as the Cold War, the beginning of the Vietnam War, etc.

Another thing about John is he bitches about just about everybody, but never really comes up with the underlying reasons for the problems.  He doesn't seem to grasp the energy issue at all.

However, he is a funny guy, and his critiques of the political stupidity are quite funny so I publish him for his humor.

RE
« Last Edit: January 24, 2015, 02:34:12 AM by RE »
Save As Many As You Can

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
9 Replies
1947 Views
Last post August 17, 2014, 07:36:25 PM
by jdwheeler42
18 Replies
3105 Views
Last post March 04, 2017, 10:29:37 AM
by Eddie
0 Replies
171 Views
Last post January 28, 2019, 10:34:59 AM
by azozeo