[html]
Off the keyboard of RE
Follow us on Twitter @doomstead666 Friend us on Facebook
Published on the Doomstead Diner on July 12, 2015
Visit the New Diner News Page for Daily Updates from around the Collapse Blogosphere
Discuss this article at the Geological & Cosmological Events Table inside the Diner
Going back a few years to my early days exploring collapse phenomena on the PeakOil.com website, "coincidentally" with the massive economic perturbations of 2008-2009, there was a huge Earthquake Swarm at Yellowstone National Park, which sits right over a "hotspot" on the surface of the earth and has been the site where 3 known Supervolcanic Events took place in the geological history of the earth.
The Yellowstone Caldera is the volcanic caldera and supervolcano located in Yellowstone National Park in the United States , sometimes referred to as the Yellowstone Supervolcano. The caldera and most of the park are located in the northwest corner of Wyoming . The major features of the caldera measure about 34 by 45 miles (55 by 72 km).[ 5]
The caldera formed during the last of three supereruptions over the past 2.1 million years: the Huckleberry Ridge eruption 2.1 million years ago (which created the Island Park Caldera and the Huckleberry Ridge Tuff ), the Mesa Falls eruption 1.3 million years ago (which created the Henry's Fork Caldera and the Mesa Falls Tuff ) and the Lava Creek eruption 640,000 years ago (which created the Yellowstone Caldera and the Lava Creek Tuff ).
For folks interested in Collapse, nothing gets the juices flowing more than contemplating ULTIMATE Fast Collapse scenarios, of which the Supervolcano is among the most interesting, and also the most probable on the Geological level as well, since these things blow off with fair regularity, and it's a certainty one of them will blow again at some point in the future, although you can't pinpoint exactly when that will be. Another difficult timeline question for the kollapsnik here.
The other big one often brought up on the Cosmological level is the posibility of an Earth Collision with a Planet killer Size Asteroid.
VIDEO
These also happen with some regularity, but not as often as supervolcanos blow off. As far as Yellowstone is concerned, based on its cycles so far, it is due or overdue right now for a blowoff, and then there are a few others sprinkled around the planet that could blow at any time.
However, do we really need a Supervolcano to go ballistic for geological disturbances to change the earth climate and ocean chemistry? I don't think so, and evidence seems to bear this out. When the Earthquake Swarm hit Yellowstone in 2009, I became very interested in this phenomenon, and with my friend Stormbringer on PeakOil.com we ran one of the longest running and most popular threads there ever, it went over 100 pages deep in posts (20 to a page) and went on for months. This got me curious about whether there actually was an increasing level of geotectonic activity, aka Earthquakes & Volcanic Eruptions.
At least in the case of Earthquakes when beginning the research, it did appear true that Earthquakes were increasing in both Frequency & Magnitude over the last 20-30 years. This was evident from the graphs supplied by DLindquist of the USGS .
Total Strength 8+ Quakes 1975-2013
Total Strength All Quakes 1975-2013
Now, one of the "debunking" theories here is that there are not more quakes or stronger quakes, just they are being better reported. However, seismographs in 1975 were plenty sensitive enough to measure any quake above say 4 on the Richter Scale anywhere on the Globe, and Geologists all over the world have been recording this stuff going well back to the early 20th Century. So the records are pretty good, especially since 1975 when DLinquist's graphs start off.
Now, earthquakes when they go off release a LOT of energy, the biggest ones past around 9 on the Richter Scale dwarf even the Tsar Bomba, the largest thermonuclear device ever detonated. That would include the Sendai Quake that wrecked Fukushima and the Anchorage Quake of 1964. Here's a list of significant Quakes from Wiki;
Approximate Magnitude Approximate TNT for Seismic Energy Yield Joule equivalent Example −0.2 7.5 g 31.5 kJ Energy released by lighting 30 typical matches 0.0 15 g 63 kJ 0.2 30 g 130 kJ Large hand grenade 0.5 84 g 351 kJ 1.0 480 g 2.0 MJ 1.2 1.1 kg 4.9 MJ Single stick of dynamite [DynoMax Pro] 1.4 2.2 kg 9.8 MJ Seismic impact of typical small construction blast 1.5 2.7 kg 11 MJ 2.0 15 kg 63 MJ 2.1 21 kg 89 MJ West fertilizer plant explosion [ 21] 2.5 85 kg 360 MJ 3.0 480 kg 2.0 GJ Oklahoma City bombing , 1995 3.5 2.7 metric tons 11 GJ PEPCON fuel plant explosion, Henderson, Nevada , 1988
Irving, Texas earthquake, September 30, 2012
3.87 9.5 metric tons 40 GJ Explosion at Chernobyl nuclear power plant , 1986 3.9 11 metric tons 45 GJ Largest of the Manchester 2002 earthquake swarm[ 22] 3.91 11 metric tons 46 GJ Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb
St. Patrick's Day earthquake, Auckland , New Zealand , 2013[ 23] [ 24]
4.0 15 metric tons 63 GJ Johannesburg /South Africa , November 18, 2013 4.3 43 metric tons 180 GJ Kent Earthquake (Britain), 2007
Eastern Kentucky earthquake, November 2012
5.0 480 metric tons 2.0 TJ Lincolnshire earthquake (UK), 2008
Ontario-Quebec earthquake (Canada), 2010 [ 25] [ 26]
5.5 2.7 kilotons 11 TJ Little Skull Mtn. earthquake (Nevada, USA), 1992
Alum Rock earthquake (California), 2007 Chino Hills earthquake (Southern California), 2008
5.6 3.8 kilotons 16 TJ Newcastle, Australia, 1989
Oklahoma, 2011 Pernik, Bulgaria, 2012
6.0 15 kilotons 63 TJ Double Spring Flat earthquake (Nevada , USA), 1994
Approximate yield of the Little Boy Atomic Bomb dropped on Hiroshima (~16 kt)
6.3 43 kilotons 180 TJ Rhodes earthquake (Greece), 2008
Jericho earthquake (British Palestine), 1927 Christchurch earthquake (New Zealand), 2011
6.4 60 kilotons 250 TJ Kaohsiung earthquake (Taiwan), 2010
Vancouver earthquake (Canada), 2011
6.5 85 kilotons 360 TJ Caracas earthquake (Venezuela), 1967
Irpinia earthquake (Italy), 1980 Eureka earthquake (California, USA), 2010 Zumpango del Rio earthquake (Guerrero, Mexico), 2011[ 27]
6.6 120 kilotons 500 TJ San Fernando earthquake (California, USA), 1971 6.7 170 kilotons 710 TJ Northridge earthquake (California, USA), 1994 6.8 240 kilotons 1.0 PJ Nisqually earthquake (Anderson Island, WA, USA), 2001
Great Hanshin earthquake (Kobe, Japan), 1995 Gisborne earthquake (Gisborne, NZ), 2007
6.9 340 kilotons 1.4 PJ San Francisco Bay Area earthquake (California, USA), 1989
Pichilemu earthquake (Chile), 2010 Sikkim earthquake (Nepal-India Border), 2011
7.0 480 kilotons 2.0 PJ Java earthquake (Indonesia), 2009
Haiti earthquake, 2010
7.1 680 kilotons 2.8 PJ Messina earthquake (Italy), 1908
San Juan earthquake (Argentina), 1944 Canterbury earthquake (New Zealand), 2010 Van earthquake (Turkey), 2011
7.2 950 kilotons 4.0 PJ Vrancea earthquake (Romania), 1977
Azores Islands Earthquake (Portugal), 1980 Baja California earthquake (Mexico), 2010
7.5 2.7 megatons 11 PJ Kashmir earthquake (Pakistan), 2005
Antofagasta earthquake (Chile), 2007
7.6 3.8 megatons 16 PJ Nicoya earthquake (Costa Rica), 2012
Oaxaca earthquake (Mexico), 2012 Gujarat earthquake (India), 2001 ?zmit earthquake (Turkey), 1999 Jiji earthquake (Taiwan), 1999
7.7 5.4 megatons 22 PJ Sumatra earthquake (Indonesia), 2010
Haida Gwaii earthquake (Canada), 2012
7.8 7.6 megatons 32 PJ Tangshan earthquake (China), 1976
Hawke's Bay earthquake (New Zealand), 1931 Luzon earthquake (Philippines), 1990 Gorkha earthquake (Nepal), 2015 [ 28]
7.9 10.7 megatons 45 PJ Tunguska event 1802 Vrancea earthquake
Great Kanto earthquake (Japan), 1923
8.0 15 megatons 63 PJ Mino-Owari earthquake (Japan), 1891
San Juan earthquake (Argentina), 1894 San Francisco earthquake (California, USA), 1906 Queen Charlotte Islands earthquake (B.C., Canada), 1949 Chincha Alta earthquake (Peru), 2007 Sichuan earthquake (China), 2008 Kangra earthquake, 1905
8.1 21 megatons 89 PJ México City earthquake (Mexico), 1985
Guam earthquake, August 8, 1993[ 29]
8.35 50 megatons 210 PJ Tsar Bomba —Largest thermonuclear weapon ever tested. Most of the energy was dissipated in the atmosphere. The seismic shock was estimated at 5.0–5.2[ 30] 8.5 85 megatons 360 PJ Sumatra earthquake (Indonesia), 2007 8.6 120 megatons 500 PJ Sumatra earthquake (Indonesia), 2012 8.7 170 megatons 710 PJ Sumatra earthquake (Indonesia), 2005 8.75 200 megatons 840 PJ Krakatoa 1883 8.8 240 megatons 1.0 EJ Chile earthquake, 2010 9.0 480 megatons 2.0 EJ Lisbon earthquake (Portugal), All Saints Day, 1755 The Great East Japan earthquake, March 2011 9.15 800 megatons 3.3 EJ Toba eruption 75,000 years ago; among the largest known volcanic events.[ 31] 9.2 950 megatons 4.0 EJ Anchorage earthquake (Alaska, USA), 1964 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake and tsunami (Indonesia), 2004 Cascadia earthquake (Pacific Northwest, USA), 1700 9.5 2.7 gigatons 11 EJ Valdivia earthquake (Chile), 1960 13.00 100 teratons 420 ZJ Yucatán Peninsula impact (creating Chicxulub crater ) 65 Ma ago (108 megatons; over 4×1029 ergs = 400 ZJ ).[ 32] [ 33] [ 34] [ 35] [ 36] 32 3.1×1029 metric tons 1.3×1039 J Starquake detected on December 27, 2004 from the ultracompact stellar corpse (magnetar ) SGR 1806-20 . The quake, which occurred 50,000 light years from Earth, released gamma rays equivalent to 1036 kW in intensity. Had it occurred within a distance of 10 light years from Earth, the quake would have possibly triggered a mass extinction.[ 37]
Now, this is mostly just the biggies. However, in aggregate you probably get more energy released by the total number of 4-6 Intensity Quakes you get each year than the big ones. Here is the chart for the 4+ Quakes:
The 5+ and 6+ charts are similar, all showing a peak of activity around 2011-2012. All this energy had to go somewhere, where did it go?
Now look at the chart for Ocean Heat Content :
When does ocean Heat Content start rising? 1992, EXACTLY the year you start to see increasing total energy released by Earthquakes! THAT friends is a SMOKING GUN .
What else occurred at the SAME Time? Ocean Acidity levels started rising and the pH dropping (lower pH is Higher Acidity, it's an inverse scale)
As you can see, it was in the late 1980s to early 1990s that Ocean pH began its real roller coaster ride downward below all previous measured minimums going back to 1700. Getting an up to date number for 2015 has so far proved difficult, but I suspect it is well below 7.9 now.
Now, where does Ocean Acidity come from? Well, definitely CO2 contributes here, dissolving in water to form the Bicarbonate Ion, HCO3-. however, Sulfur also adds to ocean acidity, forming the Sulfate Ions .
Sulfur is found in oxidation states ranging from +6 in SO4 2− to -2 in sulfides . Thus elemental sulfur can either give or receive electrons depending on its environment. Minerals such as pyrite (FeS2 ) comprise the original pool of sulfur on earth. Owing to the sulfur cycle, the amount of mobile sulfur has been continuously increasing through volcanic activity as well as weathering of the crust in an oxygenated atmosphere.[ 1] Earth's main sulfur sink is the oceans as SO2 , where it is the major oxidizing agent .[ 2]
How much sulfur does a typical Volcano Eject and what are its effects on the environment?
Volcanoes that release large amounts of sulfur compounds like sulfur oxide or sulfur dioxide affect the climate more strongly than those that eject just dust. The sulfur compounds are gases that rise easily into the stratosphere. Once there, they combine with the (limited) water available to form a haze of tiny droplets of sulfuric acid. These tiny droplets are very light in color and reflect a great deal of sunlight for their size. Although the droplets eventually grow large enough to fall to the earth, the stratosphere is so dry that it takes time, months or even years to happen. Consequently, reflective hazes of sulfur droplets can cause significant cooling of the earth for as long as two years after a major sulfur-bearing eruption. Sulfur hazes are believed to have been the primary cause of the global cooling that occurred after the Pinatubo and Tambora eruptions. For many months a satellite tracked the sulfur cloud produced by Pinatubo. The image shows the cloud about three months after the eruption. It is already a continuous band of haze encircling the entire globe. You can learn more about the cooling effects of sulfur hazes by through the sulfur dioxide plume from the Llaima Volcano , which erupted on New Year's Day in 2008.
What occurs if the eruption is not into the atmosphere, but directly into the ocean from subsea geotectonic activity?
Submarine volcanoes are underwater vents or fissures in the Earth 's surface from which magma can erupt. They are estimated to account for 75% of annual magma output. The vast majority are located near areas of tectonic plate movement , known as ocean ridges . Although most are located in the depths of seas and oceans , some also exist in shallow water, which can spew material into the air during an eruption. Hydrothermal vents , sites of abundant biological activity, are commonly found near submarine volcanoes.
With 75% of the activity coming beneath the ocean (which only makes sense since 75% of the surface of the earth is under water), even a slight increase in the amount of sulfur being released can significantly alter the Sulfur Cycle.
Notice that nowhere in this Sulfur Cycle is the quantity of Sulfur released through volcanic activity each year accounted for. I doubt anyone knows how large this quantity is, or how it changes from year to year or over geologic time either. So it is very difficult to quantify in order to measure its total effect on the ocean chemistry. Regardless of that, if you accept the hypothesis made by the study authors that geological activity was the cause of Dinosaur Extinction, it is reasonable to suppose this quantity can at times be very significant. Is this one of those times?
What about the Volcanoes? Are they really more frequent or just reported better? Here's a chart going back to 1875 from the Smithsonian Institute:
Now, maybe you can argue Volcanic Eruptions are better reported now than in 1875, but that doesn't explain why you see the dropoff in eruptions from 1980-85 and the subsequent higher peak after that.
Besides that, you have this chart with recent numbers in the years 2000-2014
What explains the vast increase between 2007 & 2009? I don't think reporting or instrumentation changed that much over those 2 years.
All of this evidence points to some level of Geotectonic contribution to the changing climate, however nobody in the mainstream of Climate Science will even consider this as it applies to the present day situation, they are too invested in the theory that Climate Change is entirely Anthropogenic and the result of Carbon Emissions from Fossil Fuels since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. While it seems likely this is a contributing factor, I don't see how you can dismiss the rest of the evidence that there is a Geotectonic component to this as well.
The whole bizness led up to the Geotectonic Ocean Heat Transfer Theory, which you can read up on here on the Diner Blog if you are so inclined.
Despite the fact nobody will apply this reasoning to the current situation, in recent months a new theory about the Extinction of the Dinosaurs at the end of the PETM came not from the preciously accepted Asteroid Impact Theory, but in fact from increasing Vulcanism. Here are Parts 1 & 2 from John Mason on Skeptical Science:
Posted on 19 March 2015 by John Mason Part One: Large Igneous Provinces and their global effects Introduction A mass extinction is an event in the fossil record, a fossilised disaster if you like, in which a massive, globally widespread and geologically rapid loss of species occurred from numerous environments. The “Big five” extinctions of the Phanerozoic (that time since the beginning of the Cambrian period, 541 million years ago) are those in which, in each instance, over half of known species disappeared from the fossil record.
How did they happen? The causes of such events, with a truly global reach, have been a well-known bone of contention within the Earth Sciences community over many decades. The popular media likes to portray such things as Hollywood-style disasters, in which everything gets wiped out in an instant. But in the realms of science, things have changed. The critically important development has been the refinement of radiometric dating, allowing us to age-constrain events down to much narrower windows of time. We can now, in some cases, talk about the start and end of an event in terms of tens of thousands (rather than millions) of years.
Such dating, coupled with the other time-tools of palaeomagnetism and the fossil record, have made it possible to develop a much clearer picture of how mass-extinctions occur. That picture is one of periods of global-scale pollution and environmental stress associated with large perturbations to the carbon cycle , lasting for thousands of years. Such upheavals are related to unusual episodes of volcanic activity with an intensity that is almost impossible to imagine. The geological calling-cards of such events are known as Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs). Bringing environmental and climatic changes at rates similar to the ones we have been creating, they have been repeat-offenders down the geological timeline. This introductory piece examines LIPs in the framework of more familiar volcanic activity: it is the only way to get a handle on their vastness.
For those readers already familiar with LIPs, you may want to skip this and go straight to Part Two , which covers the biggest extinction of them all, at the end of the Permian period, 252 million years ago (Ma ). With more than 90% of all species wiped out, it was the most severe biotic crisis in Phanerozoi