AuthorTopic: Another pension fund bites the dust  (Read 710 times)

Offline azozeo

  • Master Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 9514
    • View Profile
Another pension fund bites the dust
« on: February 01, 2017, 04:15:16 AM »
http://www.clevescene.com/scene-and-heard/archives/2017/01/05/local-ironworkers-facing-potential-pension-cuts-in-unprecedented-vote

 Local Retired Ironworkers Will See Pension Cuts Following Union Vote
Posted By Eric Sandy on Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:12 PM
Ironworkers on 200 Public Square in 1985. - @THISWASCLE

   Update: With a 616-320 vote, members of Iron Workers Local 17 approved cuts to the union's pension payments. The vote is unprecedented among private pension plans for American unions.

The gist behind the vote, which was overwhelmingly greenlit by current union members, hits retirees' wallets hard in favor of avoiding bankruptcy down the road. Some retirees will see more than half their monthly pension payments disappear. (Any member who didn't vote had his or her absence counted as a "yes" vote.)

As membership rolls decrease in unions across the country, other pension funds have applied for the same sort of Treasury Department approval that allowed this vote to happen (see below).
(Original story 1/5/17): For the first time, the Treasury Department has authorized a vote on cuts to a private pension plan for union members. Specifically, Northeast Ohio's Iron Workers Local 17 will vote this month on whether to cut their pension plan by 20 percent on average.

This is noteworthy because there are other pension plans around the country on the chopping block now, and an affirmative vote could signal more of these authorizations from the Treasury. As The Washington Post states, "The proposals could affect tens of thousands of employees and retirees who earned pensions as bricklayers, furniture workers and autoworkers."

It's a more dire situation that a straight up-or-down vote, union members say. A 2014 federal law places a few obstacles to members' otherwise guaranteed pensions. From WaPo:

    Members of the plan have to submit their votes by Jan. 20. A “no” vote from the majority of the plan members cannot be overridden by the Treasury Department.

    “The good news here is the final decision rests with the workers,” Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said in a statement.

    But some pension advocates worry that not enough participants will cast a vote, since roughly half of the members are exempt from the cuts because of their age or a disability. Under the law, anyone who does not vote will be registered as voting in favor of the proposal.

    The leaders of the Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund say the cuts are necessary to keep the fund afloat. If no changes are made, the fund is expected to run out of money by 2024. At that point, the pension plan would need to rely on a federal insurance program that is supposed to back up struggling pension plans.
I know exactly what you mean. Let me tell you why you’re here. You’re here because you know something. What you know you can’t explain, but you feel it. You’ve felt it your entire life, that there’s something wrong with the world.
You don’t know what it is but its there, like a splinter in your mind

Offline Palloy2

  • Global Moderator
  • Sous Chef
  • *****
  • Posts: 6097
    • View Profile
    • Palloy's Blog
Re: Another pension fund bites the dust
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2017, 03:33:47 PM »
What kind of union declares a non-vote to be a vote FOR decreasing workers pension rights?  - a union that has decreasing membership rolls.  Is it any wonder.
"The State is a body of armed men."

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
1048 Views
Last post October 17, 2012, 12:34:04 AM
by RE
67 Replies
10820 Views
Last post June 23, 2016, 09:16:44 PM
by RE
115 Replies
6986 Views
Last post November 21, 2019, 10:05:30 AM
by azozeo