Doomstead Diner Newz Channels => Far Out Newz => Topic started by: azozeo on September 22, 2018, 11:12:46 AM

Title: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on September 22, 2018, 11:12:46 AM

Philip Jaekl
Thu, 13 Sep 2018
I think, therefore I am,’ the 17th-century philosopher René Descartes proclaimed as a first truth. That truth was rediscovered in 1887 by Helen Keller, a deaf and blind girl, then seven years of age: ‘I did not know that I am. I lived in a world that was a no world … When I learned the meaning of “I” and “me” and found that I was something,’ she later explained, ‘I began to think. Then consciousness first existed for me.’ As both these pioneers knew, a fundamental part of conscious experience is ‘inner speech’ – the experience of verbal thought, expressed in one’s ‘inner voice’. Your inner voice is you. ( (
Title: The New Science of Inner Speech
Post by: azozeo on September 24, 2018, 12:07:21 PM

George Hoben Estabrooks (1895 – 1973) was a Canadian-American psychologist and hypnotist. He fully fit the standard “made man” pedigree that we write about so often on this website. Estabrooks was a Harvard University graduate, a Rhodes Scholar and became a 32nd-degree Knight Templar Freemason. His primary books were “Hypnotism,” “Spiritism,” and “Man, the Mechanical Misfit.”

In “Hypnotism,” first published in 1943, Estabrooks candidly acknowledged that his “main interest has always been the military application of hypnosis.” He estimated that five percent of people were excellent hypnosis candidates. Programs at various levels were pursued. Manchurian-candidate assassins, or the use of patsies, was a common theme. Infiltration of targeted governments and key positions to control a country through kakistocratic infestation or in the interest of a foreign power is right out there.

The best candidates of all were subjects suffering from what used to be termed as multiple-personality disorder (MPD), and what is now termed dissociative-identity disorder (DID). The Crime Syndicate has root-level programs to find and develop such subjects. They can also be created by the therapist. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on October 01, 2018, 10:06:10 AM

The first “social network” of brains lets three people transmit thoughts to each other’s heads
BrainNet allows collaborative problem-solving using direct brain-to-brain communication.

    by Emerging Technology from the arXiv September 29, 2018

The ability to send thoughts directly to another person’s brain is the stuff of science fiction. At least, it used to be.

 In recent years, physicists and neuroscientists have developed an armory of tools that can sense certain kinds of thoughts and transmit information about them into other brains. That has made brain-to-brain communication a reality.

These tools include electroencephalograms (EEGs) that record electrical activity in the brain and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which can transmit information into the brain. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on October 05, 2018, 05:17:24 PM
Jerry Tennant: Healing is Voltage — The Physics of Emotions | EU2017

Sep 29, 2018

Most people have heard of the “mind/body connection” and are aware that emotions affect the way people act. However, few can describe how that works. What is relatively new is our understanding that emotions are stored in and around the body as magnetic fields. Not only do these magnetic fields cause the biochemical effects noted above, but they also block the flow of voltage in the associated muscle battery packs that provide the voltage necessary for organs to function and repair themselves. He will discuss the human body’s battery packs, wiring system, and the physics of how our electronic systems are affected by these emotions. In addition, he will discuss how other magnetic fields and scalar energy can be used to erase these emotions, leaving behind only memories that do not disrupt our health and physiology. Dr. Jerry Tennant is board certified in ophthalmology and ophthalmic plastic surgery (residency, Harvard Medical School and Southwestern Medical School.) He was the director of ophthalmic plastic surgery clinic at Parkland Hospital in Dallas and practiced from 1965 to 1995. He did much of the FDA study for the VISX Excimer laser and performed approximately 1000 surgeries in the United States and Europe. In addition, Dr. Tennant was the founder/director of the Dallas Eye Institute and one of the first surgeons in the US to place intraocular lenses in eyes after cataract surgery and taught these techniques around the world. He holds patents for medical devices including intraocular lenses and several surgical instruments. While licensed in Arizona by the Board of Homeopathic and Alternative Medicine, Dr. Tennant is currently the Director of the Tennant Institute for Integrative Medicine.
Title: The new science of inner speech/ The Untethered Soul
Post by: azozeo on October 12, 2018, 06:39:42 AM
“In the book, The Untethered Soul, Michael Singer takes you step-by-step through the
process of Gyana, the Yoga of the Intellect, to the Source. Moreover, he does it with elegant
simplicity. Read this book carefully and you will get more than a glimpse of eternity.”

Part 1: Awakening Consciousness
1 The Voice Inside Your Head
2 Your Inner Roommate
3 Who Are You?
4 The Lucid Self
Part 2: Experiencing Energy
5 Infinite Energy
6 The Secrets of the Spiritual Heart
7 Transcending the Tendency to Close
Part 3: Freeing Yourself
8 Let Go Now or Fall
9 Removing Your Inner Thorn
10 Stealing Freedom for Your Soul
11 Pain, the Price of Freedom
Part 4: Going Beyond
12 Taking Down the Walls
13 Far, Far Beyond
14 Letting Go of False Solidity
Part 5: Living Life
15 The Path of Unconditional Happiness
16 The Spiritual Path of Nonresistance
17 Contemplating Death
18 The Secret of the Middle Way
19 The Loving Eyes of God


“This above all: to thine own self be true, and it must follow, as the night the day,
thou canst not then be false to any man.” —William Shakespeare

Shakespeare’s age-honored words, spoken by Polonius to his son Laertes in Act I of Hamlet, sound so
clear and unambiguous. They tell us that to maintain honest relations with others we must first be true
to ourselves. Yet if Laertes were to be totally honest with himself, he would realize that his father
may as well have told him to catch the wind. After all, to which “self” are we to be true? Is it the one
that shows up when we’re in a bad mood, or the one that is present when we feel humbled by our
mistakes? Is it the one who speaks from the dark recesses of the heart when we’re depressed or upset,
or the one that appears during those fleeting moments when life seems so fanciful and light?
From these questions we see that the concept of “self” may turn out to be a bit more elusive than
initially presumed. Perhaps if Laertes could have turned to traditional psychology, it would have shed
some light on the subject. Freud (1927), the father of psychology, divided the psyche into three parts:
the id, the ego, and the superego. He saw the id as our primal, animal nature; the superego as the
judgment system that society has instilled within us; and the ego as our representative to the outside
world that struggles to maintain a balance between the other two powerful forces. But this certainly
would not have helped young Laertes. After all, to which of these conflicting forces are we to be
Again we see that things are not always as simple as they seem. If we dare to look past the surface
of the term “self,” questions arise that many people would rather not ask: “Are the many aspects of
my being all equally part of my ‘self,’ or is there only one of me—and if so, which, where, how, and
In the following chapters, we will undertake a journey of exploration of “self.” But we will not
do so in a traditional manner. We will neither call upon the experts in psychology, nor upon the great
philosophers. We will not argue and choose between time-honored religious views, or resort to
statistically supported surveys of people’s opinions. We will, instead, turn to a single source that has
phenomenal direct knowledge on the subject. We will turn to one expert who, for every moment of
every day of their life, has been collecting the data necessary to finally put this great inquiry to rest.
And that expert is you.
But before you get too excited, or decide that you’re not up to the task, first be clear that we’re not
after your views or opinions on the subject. Neither are we interested in what books you have read,
classes you have taken, nor seminars you have attended. We are only interested in your intuitive
experience of what it is like to be you. We are not looking for your knowledge; we are seeking your
direct experience. You see, you can’t fail at this because your “self” is what you are, at all times and
in all places. We simply need to sort it out. After all, it can get quite confusing in there.
The chapters of this book are nothing but mirrors for seeing your “self” from different angles. And
though the journey we are about to embark on is an inner one, it will draw upon every aspect of your
life. The only requirement asked of you is the willingness to honestly look at yourself in the most
natural, intuitive manner. Remember, if we are seeking the root of “self,” what we are actually
seeking is you.
As you read through these pages, you will find that you know much more than you thought you did
about some very deep subjects. The fact is, you already know how to find yourself; you have just
gotten distracted and disoriented. Once refocused, you will realize that you not only have the ability
to find yourself, you have the ability to free yourself. Whether you choose to do so or not is entirely
up to you. But upon completion of your journey through these chapters, there will be no more
confusion, no more lack of empowerment, and no more blaming others. You will know exactly what
must be done. And should you choose to devote yourself to the ongoing journey of self-realization,
you will develop a tremendous sense of respect for who you really are. It is only then that you will
come to appreciate the full depth of meaning in the advice: “This above all: to thine own self be

Chapter 1

The voice inside your head

“Shoot, I can’t remember her name. What is her name? Darn, here she comes.
What is it… Sally… Sue? She just told me yesterday. What’s the matter with me? This
is going to be embarrassing.”
In case you haven’t noticed, you have a mental dialogue going on inside your head that never stops. It
just keeps going and going. Have you ever wondered why it talks in there? How does it decide what
to say and when to say it? How much of what it says turns out to be true? How much of what it says is
even important? And if right now you are hearing, “I don’t know what you’re talking about. I don’t
have any voice inside my head!”—that’s the voice we’re talking about.
If you’re smart, you’ll take the time to step back, examine this voice, and get to know it better. The
problem is, you’re too close to be objective. You have to step way back and watch it converse. While
you’re driving, you hear internal conversations like,
“Wasn’t I supposed to call Fred? I should have. Oh my God, I can’t believe I
forgot! He’s going to be so mad. He may never talk to me again. Maybe I should stop
and call him right now. No. I don’t want to stop the car right now…”
Notice that the voice takes both sides of the conversation. It doesn’t care which side it takes, just
as long as it gets to keep on talking. When you’re tired and trying to sleep, it’s the voice inside your
head that says,
“What am I doing? I can’t go to sleep yet. I forgot to call Fred. I remembered in the
car but I didn’t call. If I don’t call now…oh wait, it’s too late. I shouldn’t call him
now. I don’t even know why I thought about it. I need to fall asleep. Oh shoot, now I
can’t fall asleep. I’m not tired anymore. But I have a big day tomorrow, and I have to
get up early.”
No wonder you can’t sleep! Why do you even tolerate that voice talking to you all the time? Even if
what it’s saying is soothing and nice, it’s still disturbing everything you’re doing.
If you spend some time observing this mental voice, the first thing you will notice is that it never
shuts up. When left to its own, it just talks. Imagine if you were to see someone walking around
constantly talking to himself. You’d think he was strange. You’d wonder, “If he’s the one who’s
talking and he’s the one who’s listening, he obviously knows what’s going to be said before he says it.
So what’s the point?” The same is true for the voice inside your head. Why is it talking? It’s you
who’s talking, and it’s you who’s listening. And when the voice argues with itself, who is it arguing
with? Who could possibly win? It gets very confusing. Just listen:
“I think I should get married. No! You know you’re not ready. You’ll be sorry. But
I love him. Oh come on, you felt that way about Tom. What if you had married him?”
If you watch carefully, you’ll see that it’s just trying to find a comfortable place to rest. It will
change sides in a moment if that seems to help. And it doesn’t even quiet down when it finds out that
it’s wrong. It simply adjusts its viewpoint and keeps on going. If you pay attention, these mental
patterns will become obvious to you. It’s actually a shocking realization when you first notice that
your mind is constantly talking. You might even try to yell at it in a feeble attempt to shut it up. But
then you realize that’s the voice yelling at the voice:
“Shut up! I want to go to sleep. Why do you have to talk all the time?”
Obviously, you can’t shut it up that way. The best way to free yourself from this incessant chatter
is to step back and view it objectively. Just view the voice as a vocalizing mechanism that is capable
of making it appear like someone is in there talking to you. Don’t think about it; just notice it. No
matter what the voice is saying, it’s all the same. It doesn’t matter if it’s saying nice things or mean
things, worldly things or spiritual things. It doesn’t matter because it’s still just a voice talking inside
your head. In fact, the only way to get your distance from this voice is to stop differentiating what it’s
saying. Stop feeling that one thing it says is you and the other thing it says is not you. If you’re hearing
it talk, it’s obviously not you. You are the one who hears the voice. You are the one who notices that
it’s talking.
You do hear it when it talks, don’t you? Make it say “hello” right now. Say it over and over a few
times. Now shout it inside! Can you hear yourself saying “hello” inside? Of course you can. There is
a voice talking, and there is you who notices the voice talking. The problem is that it’s easy to notice
the voice saying “hello,” but it’s difficult to see that no matter what the voice says, it is still just a
voice talking and you listening. There is absolutely nothing that voice can say that is more you than
anything else it says. Suppose you were looking at three objects—a flowerpot, a photograph, and a
book—and were then asked, “Which of these objects is you?” You’d say, “None of them! I’m the one
who’s looking at what you’re putting in front of me. It doesn’t matter what you put in front of me, it’s
always going to be me looking at it.” You see, it’s an act of a subject perceiving various objects. This
is also true of hearing the voice inside. It doesn’t make any difference what it’s saying, you are the
one who is aware of it. As long as you think that one thing it’s saying is you, but the other thing it’s
saying is not you, you’ve lost your objectivity. You may want to think of yourself as the part that says
the nice things, but that’s still the voice talking. You may like what it says, but it’s not you.
There is nothing more important to true growth than realizing that you are not the voice of the mind
—you are the one who hears it. If you don’t understand this, you will try to figure out which of the
many things the voice says is really you. People go through so many changes in the name of “trying to
find myself.” They want to discover which of these voices, which of these aspects of their
personality, is who they really are. The answer is simple: none of them.
If you watch it objectively, you will come to see that much of what the voice says is meaningless.
Most of the talking is just a waste of time and energy. The truth is that most of life will unfold in
accordance with forces far outside your control, regardless of what your mind says about it. It’s like
sitting down at night and deciding whether you want the sun to come up in the morning. The bottom
line is, the sun will come up and the sun will go down. Billions of things are going on in this world.
You can think about it all you want, but life is still going to keep on happening.
In fact, your thoughts have far less impact on this world than you would like to think. If you’re
willing to be objective and watch all your thoughts, you will see that the vast majority of them have
no relevance. They have no effect on anything or anybody, except you. They are simply making you
feel better or worse about what is going on now, what has gone on in the past, or what might go on in
the future. If you spend your time hoping that it doesn’t rain tomorrow, you are wasting your time.
Your thoughts don’t change the rain. You will someday come to see that there is no use for that
incessant internal chatter, and there is no reason to constantly attempt to figure everything out.
Eventually you will see that the real cause of problems is not life itself. It’s the commotion the mind
makes about life that really causes problems.
Now this raises a serious question: If so much of what the voice says is meaningless and
unnecessary, then why does it even exist? The secret to answering this question lies in understanding
why it says what it says when it says it. For example, in some cases the mental voice talks for the
same reason that a teakettle whistles. That is, there’s a buildup of energy inside that needs to be
released. If you watch objectively, you will see that when there’s a buildup of nervous, fearful, or
desire-based energies inside, the voice becomes extremely active. This is easy to see when you are
angry with someone and you feel like telling them off. Just watch how many times the inner voice tells
them off before you even see them. When energy builds up inside, you want to do something about it.
That voice talks because you’re not okay inside, and talking releases energy.
You will notice, however, that even when you’re not particularly bothered by something, it still
talks. When you’re walking down the street it says things like,
“Look at that dog! It’s a Labrador! Hey, there’s another dog in that car. He looks a
lot like my first dog, Shadow. Whoa, there’s an old Oldsmobile. It’s got Alaska plates.
You don’t see many of those down here!”
It is actually narrating the world for you. But why do you need this? You already see what’s
happening outside; how does it help to repeat it to yourself through the mental voice? You should
examine this very closely. With a simple glance, you instantly take in the tremendous detail of
whatever you’re looking at. If you see a tree, you effortlessly see the branches, the leaves, and the
flowering buds. Why then do you have to verbalize what you have already seen?
“Look at that dogwood. The green leaves are so beautiful against the white
flowers. Look how many flowers there are. Wow, it’s so full!”
What you’ll see, if you study this carefully, is that the narration makes you feel more comfortable
with the world around you. Like backseat driving, it makes you feel as though things are more in your
control. You actually feel like you have some relationship with them. A tree is no longer just a tree in
the world that has nothing to do with you; it is a tree that you saw, labeled, and judged. By verbalizing
it mentally, you brought that initial direct experience of the world into the realm of your thoughts.
There it becomes integrated with your other thoughts, such as those making up your value system and
historical experiences.
Take a moment to examine the difference between your experience of the outside world and your
interactions with the mental world. When you’re just thinking, you’re free to create whatever thoughts
you want in your mind, and these thoughts are expressed through the voice. You are very accustomed
to settling into the playground of the mind and creating and manipulating thoughts. This inner world is
an alternate environment that is under your control. The outside world, however, marches to its own
laws. When the voice narrates the outside world to you, those thoughts are now side by side, in parity,
with all your other thoughts. All these thoughts intermix and actually influence your experience of the
world around you. What you end up experiencing is really a personal presentation of the world
according to you, rather than the stark, unfiltered experience of what is really out there. This mental
manipulation of the outer experience allows you to buffer reality as it comes in. For example, there
are myriad things that you see at any given moment, yet you only narrate a few of them. The ones you
discuss in your mind are the ones that matter to you. With this subtle form of preprocessing, you
manage to control the experience of reality so that it all fits together inside your mind. Your
consciousness is actually experiencing your mental model of reality, not reality itself.
You have to watch this very carefully because you do it all the time. You’re walking outside in the
winter, you start to shiver, and the voice says, “It’s cold!” Now how did that help you? You already
knew it was cold. You’re the one who’s experiencing the cold. Why is it telling you this? You recreate
the world within your mind because you can control your mind whereas you can’t control the
world. That is why you mentally talk about it. If you can’t get the world the way you like it, you
internally verbalize it, judge it, complain about it, and then decide what to do about it. This makes you
feel more empowered. When your body experiences cold, there may be nothing you can do to affect
the temperature. But when your mind verbalizes, “It’s cold!” you can say, “We’re almost home, just a
few more minutes.” Now you feel better. In the thought world there’s always something you can do to
control the experience.
Basically, you re-create the outside world inside yourself, and then you live in your mind. What if
you decided not to do this? If you decide not to narrate and, instead, just consciously observe the
world, you will feel more open and exposed. This is because you really don’t know what will happen
next, and your mind is accustomed to helping you. It does this by processing your current experiences
in a way that makes them fit with your views of the past and visions of the future. All of this helps to
create a semblance of control. If your mind doesn’t do this, you simply become too uncomfortable.
Reality is just too real for most of us, so we temper it with the mind.
You will come to see that the mind talks all the time because you gave it a job to do. You use it as
a protection mechanism, a form of defense. Ultimately, it makes you feel more secure. As long as
that’s what you want, you will be forced to constantly use your mind to buffer yourself from life,
instead of living it. This world is unfolding and really has very little to do with you or your thoughts.
It was here long before you came, and it will be here long after you leave. In the name of attempting to
hold the world together, you’re really just trying to hold yourself together.
True personal growth is about transcending the part of you that is not okay and needs protection.
This is done by constantly remembering that you are the one inside that notices the voice talking. That
is the way out. The one inside who is aware that you are always talking to yourself about yourself is
always silent. It is a doorway to the depths of your being. To be aware that you are watching the voice
talk is to stand on the threshold of a fantastic inner journey. If used properly, the same mental voice
that has been a source of worry, distraction, and general neurosis can become the launching ground
for true spiritual awakening. Come to know the one who watches the voice, and you will come to
know one of the great mysteries of creation.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech Chap. 2
Post by: azozeo on October 12, 2018, 07:02:29 AM
Chapter 2

Your inner roommate

Your inner growth is completely dependent upon the realization that the only way to find peace and
contentment is to stop thinking about yourself. You’re ready to grow when you finally realize that the
“I” who is always talking inside will never be content. It always has a problem with something.
Honestly, when was the last time you really had nothing bothering you? Before you had your current
problem, there was a different problem. And if you’re wise, you will realize that after this one’s
gone, there will be another one.
The bottom line is, you’ll never be free of problems until you are free from the part within that has
so many problems. When a problem is disturbing you, don’t ask, “What should I do about it?” Ask,
“What part of me is being disturbed by this?” If you ask, “What should I do about it?” you’ve already
fallen into believing that there really is a problem outside that must be dealt with. If you want to
achieve peace in the face of your problems, you must understand why you perceive a particular
situation as a problem. If you’re feeling jealousy, instead of trying to see how you can protect
yourself, just ask, “What part of me is jealous?” That will cause you to look inside and see that
there’s a part of you that’s having a problem with jealousy.
Once you clearly see the disturbed part, then ask, “Who is it that sees this? Who notices this inner
disturbance?” Asking this is the solution to your every problem. The very fact that you can see the
disturbance means that you are not it. The process of seeing something requires a subject- object
relationship. The subject is called “The Witness” because it is the one who sees what’s happening.
The object is what you are seeing, in this case the inner disturbance. This act of maintaining objective
awareness of the inner problem is always better than losing yourself in the outer situation. This is the
essential difference between a spiritually minded person and a worldly person. Worldly doesn’t mean
that you have money or stature. Worldly means that you think the solution to your inner problems is in
the world outside. You think that if you change things outside, you’ll be okay. But nobody has ever
truly become okay by changing things outside. There’s always the next problem. The only real
solution is to take the seat of witness consciousness and completely change your frame of reference.
To attain true inner freedom, you must be able to objectively watch your problems instead of
being lost in them. No solution can possibly exist while you’re lost in the energy of a problem.
Everyone knows you can’t deal well with a situation if you’re getting anxious, scared, or angry about
it. The first problem you have to deal with is your own reaction. You will not be able to solve
anything outside until you own how the situation affects you inside. Problems are generally not what
they appear to be. When you get clear enough, you will realize that the real problem is that there is
something inside of you that can have a problem with almost anything. The first step is to deal with
that part of you. This involves a change from “outer solution consciousness” to “inner solution
consciousness.” You have to break the habit of thinking that the solution to your problems is to
rearrange things outside. The only permanent solution to your problems is to go inside and let go of
the part of you that seems to have so many problems with reality. Once you do that, you’ll be clear
enough to deal with what’s left.
There really is a way to let go of the part of you that sees everything as a problem. It may seem
impossible, but it’s not. There is a part of your being that can actually abstract from your own
melodrama. You can watch yourself be jealous or angry. You don’t have to think about it or analyze it;
you can just be aware of it. Who is it that sees all this? Who notices the changes going on inside?
When you tell a friend, “Every time I talk to Tom, it gets me so upset,” how do you know it gets you
upset? You know that it gets you upset because you’re in there and you see what’s going on in there.
There’s a separation between you and the anger or the jealousy. You are the one who’s in there
noticing these things. Once you take that seat of consciousness, you can get rid of these personal
disturbances. You start by watching. Just be aware that you are aware of what is going on in there. It’s
easy. What you’ll notice is that you’re watching a human being’s personality with all its strengths and
weaknesses. It’s as though there’s somebody in there with you. You might actually say you have a
If you would like to meet your roommate, just try to sit inside yourself for a while in complete
solitude and silence. You have the right; it’s your inner domain. But instead of finding silence, you’re
going to listen to incessant chatter:
“Why am I doing this? I have more important things to do. This is a waste of time.
There’s nobody in here but me. What’s this all about?”
Right on cue, there’s your roommate. You may have a clear intention to be quiet inside, but your
roommate won’t cooperate. And it’s not just when you try to be quiet. It has something to say about
everything you look at: “I like it. I don’t like it. This is good. That’s bad.” It just talks and talks. You
don’t generally notice because you don’t step back from it. You’re so close that you don’t realize that
you’re actually hypnotized into listening to it.
Basically, you’re not alone in there. There are two distinct aspects of your inner being. The first is
you, the awareness, the witness, the center of your willful intentions; and the other is that which you
watch. The problem is, the part that you watch never shuts up. If you could get rid of that part, even
for a moment, the peace and serenity would be the nicest vacation you’ve ever had.
Imagine what it would be like if you didn’t have to bring this thing with you everywhere you go.
Real spiritual growth is about getting out of this predicament. But first you have to realize that you’ve
been locked in there with a maniac. In any situation or circumstance, your roommate could suddenly
decide, “I don’t want to be here. I don’t want to do this. I don’t want to talk to this person.” You
would immediately feel tense and uncomfortable. Your roommate can ruin anything you’re doing
without a moment’s notice. It could ruin your wedding day, or even your wedding night! That part of
you can ruin anything and everything, and it generally does.
You buy a brand-new car and it’s beautiful. But every time you drive it, your inner roommate finds
something wrong with it. The mental voice keeps pointing out every little squeak, every little
vibration, until eventually you don’t even like the car anymore. Once you see what this can do to your
life, you are ready for spiritual growth. You’re ready for real transformation when you finally say,
“Look at this thing. It’s ruining my life. I’m trying to live a peaceful, meaningful existence, but I feel
like I’m sitting on top of a volcano. At any moment this thing can decide to freak, close down, and
fight with what’s happening. One day it likes someone, and the next day it decides to pick on
everything they do. My life is a mess just because this thing that lives in here with me has to make a
melodrama out of everything.” Once you’ve seen this, and learn to no longer identify with your
roommate, you’re ready to free yourself.
If you haven’t reached this awareness yet, just start to watch. Spend a day watching every single
thing your roommate does. Start in the morning and see if you can notice what it’s saying in every
situation. Every time you meet somebody, every time the phone rings, just try to watch. A good time to
watch it talk is while you’re taking a shower. Just watch what that voice has to say. You will see that
it never lets you just take a peaceful shower. Your shower is for washing the body, not for watching
the mind talk nonstop. See if you can stay conscious enough throughout the entire experience to be
aware of what’s going on. You’ll be shocked by what you see. It just jumps from one subject to the
next. The incessant chatter seems so neurotic that you won’t believe that it’s always that way. But it
You have to watch this if you want to be free of it. You don’t have to do anything about it, but you
have to get wise to the predicament you’re in. You have to realize that somehow you’ve ended up
with a mess for an inner roommate. If you want it to be peaceful in there, you’re going to have to fix
this situation.
The way to catch on to what your inner roommate is really like is to personify it externally. Make
believe that your roommate, the psyche, has a body of its own. You do this by taking the entire
personality that you hear talking to you inside and imagine it as a person talking to you on the outside.
Just imagine that another person is now saying everything that your inner voice would say. Now spend
a day with that person.
You’ve just sat down to watch your favorite TV show. The problem is, you have this person with
you. Now you’ll get to hear the same incessant monologue that used to be inside, except that it’s
sitting next to you on the couch talking to itself:
“Did you turn off the light downstairs? You better go check. Not now, I’ll do it
later. I want to finish watching the show. No, do it now. That’s why the electric bill is
so high.”
You sit in silent awe, watching all of this. Then, a few seconds later, your couch-mate is engaged in
another dispute:
“Hey, I want to get something to eat! I’m craving some pizza. No, you can’t have
pizza now; it’s too far to drive. But I’m hungry. When will I get to eat?”
To your amazement, these neurotic bursts of conflicting dialogue just keep going on and on. And as if
that’s not enough, instead of simply watching TV, this person starts verbally reacting to whatever
comes on the screen. At one point, after a redhead appears on the show, your couch-mate starts
mumbling about an ex-spouse and a painful divorce. Then the yelling starts—just as though the exspouse
were in the room with you! Then it stops, just as suddenly as it started. At this point, you find
yourself hugging the far corner of the couch in a desperate attempt to get as far away from this
disturbed person as you possibly can.
Will you dare to do this experiment? Don’t try to make the person stop talking. Just try to get to
know what you live with inside by externalizing the voice. Give it a body and put it out there in the
world just like everybody else. Let it be a person who says on the outside exactly what the voice of
your mind says inside. Now make that person your best friend. After all, how many friends do you
spend all of your time with and pay absolute attention to every word they say?
How would you feel if someone outside really started talking to you the way your inner voice
does? How would you relate to a person who opened their mouth to say everything your mental voice
says? After a very short period of time, you would tell them to leave and never come back. But when
your inner friend continuously speaks up, you don’t ever tell it to leave. No matter how much trouble
it causes, you listen. There’s almost nothing that voice can say that you don’t pay full attention to. It
pulls you right out of whatever you’re doing, no matter how enjoyable, and suddenly you’re paying
attention to whatever it has to say. Imagine that you’re in a serious relationship and are about to get
married. You’re driving to the wedding and it says,
“Maybe this is not the right person. I’m really getting nervous about this. What
should I do?”
If someone outside of you said that, you’d ignore them. But you feel you owe the voice an answer.
You have to convince your nervous mind that this is the right person, or it won’t let you walk down
the aisle. That’s how much respect you have for this neurotic thing inside of you. You know that if you
don’t listen to it, it will bother you every day of your life:
“I told you not to get married. I said I wasn’t sure!”
The bottom line is undeniable: If somehow that voice managed to manifest in a body outside of
you, and you had to take it with you everywhere you went, you wouldn’t last a day. If somebody were
to ask you what your new friend is like, you’d say, “This is one seriously disturbed person. Just look
up neurosis in the dictionary and you’ll get the picture.”
That being the case, once you’ve spent a day with your friend, what is the probability you’d go to
them for advice? After seeing how often this person changed their mind, how conflicted they were on
so many subjects, and how emotionally overreactive they tended to be, would you ever ask them for
relationship or financial advice? As amazing as it seems, you do just that every moment of your life.
Having taken its rightful place back inside of you, it is still the same “person” who tells you what to
do about every aspect of your life. Have you ever bothered to check its credentials? How many times
has that voice been totally wrong?
“She doesn’t care for you anymore. That’s why she hasn’t called. She’s going to
break up with you tonight. I can feel it coming; I just know it. You shouldn’t even
answer the phone if she calls.”
After thirty minutes of this, the phone rings and it’s your girlfriend. She’s late because it’s your oneyear
anniversary and she was preparing for a surprise dinner. It was definitely a surprise to you, since
you completely forgot the anniversary. She says she’s on her way over to pick you up. Well, you’re
very excited and your inner voice is chatting about how great she is. But haven’t you forgotten
something? Haven’t you forgotten about the bad advice the inner voice gave you that caused you to
suffer for the last half hour?
What if you had hired a relationship advisor who had given you that terrible advice? They had
completely misread the entire situation. Had you listened to the advisor, you never would have picked
up the phone. Wouldn’t you fire them on the spot? How could you ever trust their advice again after
seeing how wrong they were? Well, are you going to fire your inner roommate? After all, its advice
and analysis of the situation were totally wrong. No, you never hold it responsible for the trouble it
causes. In fact, the next time it gives advice, you’re all ears. Is that rational? How many times has that
voice been wrong about what was going on or what will be going on? Maybe it’s worth noticing
whom you’re going to for advice.
When you’ve sincerely tried these practices of self-observation and awareness, you’ll see that
you’re in trouble. You’ll realize that you’ve only had one problem your entire life, and you’re looking
at it. It’s pretty much the cause of every problem you’ve ever had. Now the question becomes, how do
you get rid of this inner troublemaker? The first thing you’ll realize is that there’s no hope of getting
rid of it until you really want to. Until you’ve watched your roommate long enough to truly understand
the predicament you’re in, you really have no basis for practices that help you deal with the mind.
Once you’ve made the decision to free yourself from the mental melodrama, you are ready for
teachings and techniques. You will now have a real use for them.
You will be relieved to know that you are not the first person to have this problem. There are
those who have gone before you who found themselves in the same situation. Many of them looked for
guidance from those who had mastered this field of knowledge. They were given teachings and
techniques, such as yoga, which were created to help in this process. Yoga is not really about getting
your body healthy, although it does that too. Yoga is about the knowledge that will help you out of
your predicament, the knowledge that can free you. Once you’ve made this freedom the meaning of
your life, there are spiritual practices that can help you. These practices are what you do with your
time in order to free yourself from yourself. You will eventually catch on that you have to distance
yourself from your psyche. You do this by setting the direction of your life when you’re clear and not
letting the wavering mind deter you. Your will is stronger than the habit of listening to that voice.
There is nothing you can’t do. Your will is supreme over all of this.
If you want to free yourself, you must first become conscious enough to understand your
predicament. Then you must commit yourself to the inner work of freedom. You do this as though your
life depended on it, because it does. As it is right now, your life is not your own; it belongs to your
inner roommate, the psyche. You have to take it back. Stand firm in the seat of the witness and release
the hold that the habitual mind has on you. This is your life—reclaim it.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech Chap. 3
Post by: azozeo on October 12, 2018, 08:07:46 AM
who are you?
Ramana Maharshi (1879-1950), a great teacher in the yogic tradition, used to say that to attain inner
freedom one must continuously and sincerely ask the question “Who am I?” He taught that this was
more important than reading books, learning mantras, or going to holy places. Just ask, “Who am I?
Who sees when I see? Who hears when I hear? Who knows that I am aware? Who am I?”
Let’s explore this question by playing a game. Make believe that you and I are having a
conversation. Typically, in Western cultures, when someone comes up to you and asks, “Excuse me,
who are you?” you don’t admonish them for asking such a deep question. You tell them your name, for
example, Sally Smith. But I’m going to challenge this response by taking out a piece of paper and
writing the letters S-a-l-l-y S-m-i-t-h, and then showing it to you. Is that who you are—a collection of
letters? Is that who sees when you see? Obviously not, so you say,
“Okay, you’re right, I’m sorry. I’m not Sally Smith. That’s just a name people call
me. It’s a label. Really, I’m Frank Smith’s wife.”
No way, that’s not even politically correct nowadays. How could you be Frank Smith’s wife? Are you
saying you didn’t exist before you met Frank, and you would cease to exist if he died or you got
remarried? Frank Smith’s wife can’t be who you are. Again, that’s just another label, the result of
another situation or event you participated in. But then, who are you? This time you respond,
“Okay, now you have my attention. My label is Sally Smith. I was born in 1965 in
New York. I lived in Queens with my parents, Harry and Mary Jones, until I was five
years old. Then we moved to New Jersey and I went to Newark Elementary School. I
got all A’s in school, and in the fifth grade I played Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz. I
started dating in the ninth grade, and my first boyfriend was Joe. I went to Rutgers
College where I met and married Frank Smith. That is who I am.”
Wait a minute, that’s a fascinating story, but I didn’t ask you what has happened to you since you were
born. I asked you, “Who are you?” You’ve just described all these experiences, but who had these
experiences? Wouldn’t you still be in there, aware of your existence, even if you had gone to a
different college?
So you contemplate this, and you realize that never in your life have you asked yourself that
question and really meant it. Who am I? That is what Ramana Maharshi was asking. So you ponder
this more seriously and you say,
“Okay, I am the body that is occupying this space. I am five foot six and I weigh
135 pounds, and here I am.”
When you were Dorothy in the fifth grade play you weren’t five foot six, you were four foot six. So
which are you? Are you the four foot six person or are you the five foot six person? Weren’t you in
there when you were Dorothy? You told me you were. Aren’t you the one who had the experience of
being Dorothy in the fifth grade play and is now having the experience of trying to answer my
questions? Isn’t this the same you?
Perhaps we need to step back for a moment to ask some exploratory questions before returning to
the core question. When you were ten years old, didn’t you look in the mirror and see a ten-year-old
body? Wasn’t that the same you that now sees an adult body? What you looked at has changed; but
what about you, the one who is looking? Isn’t there a continuity of being? Wasn’t it the same being that
looked in the mirror throughout the years? You have to contemplate this very carefully. Here’s another
question: When you go to sleep every night, do you dream? Who dreams? What does it mean to
dream? You answer, “Well, it’s like a motion picture plays in my mind and I watch it.” Who watches
it? “I do!” The same you who looks in the mirror? Does the same you who is reading these words
also look in the mirror and watch the dreams? When you awake, you know you saw the dream. There
is a continuity of conscious awareness of being. Ramana Maharshi was just asking some very simple
questions: Who sees when you see? Who hears when you hear? Who watches the dreams? Who looks
at the image in the mirror? Who is it that is having all these experiences? If you try to just give honest,
intuitive answers, you are simply going to say, “Me. It’s me. I’m in here experiencing all of this.”
That’s about the best answer you’ll have.
It’s actually pretty easy to see that you’re not the objects you look at. It’s a classic case of subjectobject.
It’s you, the subject, that is looking at the objects. So we don’t have to go through every object
in the universe and say that object is not you. We can very easily generalize by saying that if you are
the one who is looking at something, then that something is not you. So right away, in one fell swoop,
you know what you’re not: you’re not the outside world. You’re the one who is inside looking out at
that world.
That was easy. Now at least we’ve eliminated the countless things outside. But who are you? And
where are you if you’re not outside with all the other things? You just have to pay attention and realize
that you would still be in there experiencing feelings even if all the outside objects disappeared.
Imagine how much fear you would feel. You might also feel frustration, and even anger. But who
would be feeling these things? Again you say “Me!” And that’s the right answer. The same “me”
experiences both the outside world and the inside emotions.
To take a clear look at this, imagine that you’re watching a dog play outdoors. Suddenly you hear
a noise right behind you—a hiss, like a rattlesnake! Would you still be looking at the dog with the
same intensity of focus? Of course not. You’d be feeling tremendous fear inside. Though the dog
would still be playing in front of you, you’d be completely preoccupied with the experience of fear.
All of your attention can very quickly become absorbed in your emotions. But who feels the fear?
Isn’t it the same you who was watching the dog? Who feels love when you feel love? Can’t you feel
so much love that it’s hard to keep your eyes open? You can become so absorbed in beautiful inner
feelings, or frightening inner fears, that it’s hard to focus on outer objects. In essence, inside and
outside objects compete for your attention. You are in there having both inner and outer experiences—
but who are you?
To explore this more deeply, answer another question: Don’t you have times when you’re not
having emotional experiences and, instead, you just feel quiet inside? You’re still in there, but you’re
just aware of peaceful quiet. Eventually, you will begin to realize that the outside world and the flow
of inner emotions come and go. But you, the one who experiences these things, remain consciously
aware of whatever passes before you.
But where are you? Maybe we can find you in your thoughts. René Descartes, a great philosopher,
once said, “I think, therefore I am.” But is that really what’s going on? The dictionary defines the verb
“to think” as “to form thoughts, to use the mind to consider ideas and make judgments” (Microsoft
Encarta 2007). The question is, who is using the mind to form thoughts and then manipulate them into
ideas and judgments? Does this experiencer of thoughts exist even when thoughts are not present?
Fortunately, you don’t have to think about it. You are very aware of your presence of being, your
sense of existence, without the help of thoughts. When you go into deep meditation, for example, the
thoughts stop. You know that they’ve stopped. You don’t “think” it, you are simply aware of “no
thoughts.” You come back and say, “Wow, I went into this deep meditation, and for the first time my
thoughts completely stopped. I was in a place of complete peace, harmony, and quiet.” If you are in
there experiencing the peace that occurs when your thoughts stop, then obviously your existence is not
dependent upon the act of thinking.
Thoughts can stop, and they can also get extremely noisy. Sometimes you have many more thoughts
than other times. You may even tell someone, “My mind is driving me crazy. Ever since he said those
things to me, I can’t even sleep. My mind just won’t shut up.” Whose mind? Who is noticing these
thoughts? Isn’t it you? Don’t you hear your thoughts inside? Aren’t you aware of their existence? In
fact, can’t you get rid of them? If you start to have a thought you don’t like, can’t you try to make it go
away? People struggle with thoughts all the time. Who is it that is aware of the thoughts, and who is it
that struggles with them? Again, you have a subject-object relationship with your thoughts. You are
the subject, and thoughts are just another object you can be aware of. You are not your thoughts. You
are simply aware of your thoughts. Finally you say,
“Fine, I’m not anything in the outside world and I’m not the emotions. These outer
and inner objects come and go and I experience them. Plus, I’m not the thoughts. They
can be quiet or noisy, happy or sad. Thoughts are just something else I’m aware of. But
who am I?”
It starts to become a serious question: “Who am I? Who is having all these physical, emotional,
and mental experiences?” So you contemplate this question a little deeper. This is done by letting go
of the experiences and noticing who is left. You will begin to notice who is experiencing the
experience. Eventually, you will get to a point within yourself where you realize that you, the
experiencer, have a certain quality. And that quality is awareness, consciousness, an intuitive sense of
existence. You know that you’re in there. You don’t have to think about it; you just know. You can
think about it if you want to, but you will know that you’re thinking about it. You exist regardless,
thoughts or no thoughts.
To make this more experiential, let’s try a consciousness experiment. Notice that with a single
glance at a room, or out a window, you instantaneously see the full detail of everything that’s in front
of you. You are effortlessly aware of all the objects that are within the scope of your vision, both near
and far away. Without moving your head or eyes, you perceive all the intricate detail of what you
immediately see. Look at all the colors, the variations of light, the grain of wood furniture, the
architecture of buildings, and the variations of bark and leaves on trees. Notice that you take all this
in at once, without having to think about it. No thoughts are necessary; you just see it. Now try to use
thoughts to isolate, label, and describe all the intricate detail of what you see. How long would it take
your mental voice to describe all that detail to you, versus the instantaneous snapshot of
consciousness just seeing? When you just look without creating thoughts, your consciousness is
effortlessly aware of, and fully comprehends, all that it sees.
Consciousness is the highest word you will ever utter. There is nothing higher or deeper than
consciousness. Consciousness is pure awareness. But what is awareness? Let’s try another
experiment. Let’s say you are in a room looking at a group of people and a piano. Now make believe
the piano ceases to exist in your world. Would you have a major problem with that? You say, “No, I
don’t think so. I’m not attached to pianos.” Okay then, make believe the people in the room cease to
exist. Are you still okay? Can you handle it? You say, “Sure, I like being alone.” Now make believe
your awareness doesn’t exist. Just turn it off. How are you doing now?
What would it be like if your awareness didn’t exist? It’s actually pretty simple—you wouldn’t be
there. There would be no sense of “me.” There wouldn’t be anyone in there to say, “Wow, I used to be
in here but now I’m not.” There would no longer be an awareness of being. And without awareness of
being, or consciousness, there is nothing. Are there objects? Who knows? If no one is aware of the
objects, their existence or nonexistence becomes completely irrelevant. It doesn’t matter how many
things are in front of you; if you turn off the consciousness, there is nothing. If you are conscious,
however, there can be nothing in front of you but you are fully aware that there is nothing. It’s really
not that complicated, and it’s very enlightening.
So now if I ask you, “Who are you?” you answer,
“I am the one who sees. From back in here somewhere, I look out, and I am aware
of the events, thoughts, and emotions that pass before me.”
If you go very deep, that is where you live. You live in the seat of consciousness. A true spiritual
being lives there, without effort and without intent. Just as you effortlessly look outside and see all
that you see, you will eventually sit far enough back inside to see all your thoughts and emotions, as
well as outer form. All of these objects are in front of you. The thoughts are closer in, the emotions
are a little further away, and form is way out there. Behind it all, there you are. You go so deep that
you realize that’s where you’ve always been. At each stage of your life you have seen different
thoughts, emotions, and objects pass before you. But you have always been the conscious receiver of
all that was.
Now you are in your center of consciousness. You are behind everything, just watching. That is
your true home. Take everything else away and you’re still there, aware that everything is gone. But
take the center of awareness away, and there is nothing. That center is the seat of Self. From that seat,
you are aware that there are thoughts, emotions, and a world coming in through your senses. But now
you are aware that you’re aware. That is the seat of the Buddhist Self1, the Hindu Atman2 and the
Judeo-Christian Soul. The great mystery begins once you take that seat deep within.
1As explicated by the Buddha in the Mahayana Mahaparinirvana Sutra (trans. Kosho Yamamoto
2Atman: Hinduism - The innermost essence of each individual (Merriam-Webster 2003).
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech Chap. 4
Post by: azozeo on October 12, 2018, 08:23:11 AM
the lucid self
There is a type of dream, called a lucid dream, in which you know that you’re dreaming. If you fly in
the dream you know that you’re flying. You think, “Hey, look! I’m dreaming that I’m flying. I’m going
to fly over there.” You are actually conscious enough to know that you are flying in the dream and that
you are dreaming the dream. That’s very different from regular dreams, in which you are fully
immersed in the dream. This distinction is exactly the difference between being aware that you are
aware in your daily life, and not being aware that you are aware. When you are an aware being, you
no longer become completely immersed in the events around you. Instead, you remain inwardly aware
that you are the one who is experiencing both the events and the corresponding thoughts and emotions.
When a thought is created in this state of awareness, instead of getting lost in it, you remain aware that
you are the one who is thinking the thought. You are lucid.
This raises some very interesting questions. If you are the indwelling being who is experiencing
all this, then why do these different levels of perception exist? When you are seated in the awareness
of Self, you are lucid. Where are you when you are not seated deeply enough inside the Self to be the
conscious experiencer of all you are experiencing?
To begin with, consciousness has the ability to do what is called “focus.” It is part of the nature of
consciousness. The essence of consciousness is awareness, and awareness has the ability to become
more aware of one thing and less aware of something else. In other words, it has the ability to focus
itself on certain objects. The teacher says, “Concentrate on what I’m saying.” What does that mean? It
means focus your consciousness on one place. Teachers figure you know how to do that. Who taught
you how to do that? What class in high school taught you how to take your consciousness and move it
somewhere in order to focus on something? Nobody taught you this. It was intuitive and natural.
You’ve always known how to do it.
So we do know that consciousness exists; we just don’t normally talk about it. You probably went
through grade school, high school, and college without anyone discussing the nature of consciousness.
Fortunately, the nature of consciousness has been studied very closely in deep teachings such as yoga.
In fact, the ancient teachings of yoga are all about consciousness.
The best way to learn about consciousness is through your own direct experience. For example,
you know very well that your consciousness can be aware of a wide field of objects, or it can be so
focused on one object that you are unaware of anything else. This is what happens when you get lost
in thought. You can be reading, and then suddenly you’re not reading anymore. It happens all the time.
You just start thinking about something else. Outside objects or mental thoughts can catch your
attention at any time. But it’s still the same awareness, whether it is focused on the outside or on your
The key is that consciousness has the ability to concentrate on different things. The subject,
consciousness, has the ability to selectively focus awareness on specific objects. If you step back,
you will clearly see that objects are constantly passing before you at all three levels: mental,
emotional, and physical. When you’re not centered, your consciousness invariably gets attracted
toward one or more of those objects and focuses on them. If it concentrates enough, your sense of
awareness loses itself in the object. It is no longer aware that it is aware of the object; it just becomes
object-conscious. Have you ever noticed that when you’re deeply absorbed in watching TV, you have
no awareness of where you’re sitting or what else is going on in the room?
The TV analogy is perfect for examining how our center of consciousness shifts from awareness
of Self to being lost in the objects we’re focused upon. The difference is that instead of sitting in your
living room getting absorbed in the TV, you’re sitting in your center of consciousness getting absorbed
in the screens of mind, emotions, and outside images. When you concentrate on the world of the
physical senses, it draws you in. Then your emotional and mental reactions draw you in further. At
that point, you are no longer sitting in the centered Self; you are absorbed in the inner show you’re
Let’s look at your inner show. You have an underlying pattern of thoughts that goes on around you
all the time. This pattern of thoughts stays pretty much the same. You are as familiar and comfortable
with your normal thought patterns as you are with the living space of your home. You also have
emotions that are your norm: a certain amount of fear, a certain amount of love, and a certain amount
of insecurity. You know that if certain things happen, one or more of these emotions will flare up and
dominate your awareness. Then, eventually, they will settle back down to the norm. You know this so
well that you are very busy inside making sure nothing happens to create these disturbances. In fact,
you are so preoccupied with controlling your world of thoughts, emotions, and physical sensations
that you don’t even know you’re in there. That is the normal state for most people.
When you are in this lost state, you get so totally absorbed in the objects of thoughts, feelings, and
the senses, that you forget the subject. Right now, you are sitting inside the center of consciousness
watching your personal TV show. But there are so many interesting objects distracting your
consciousness that you can’t help but get drawn into them. It’s overwhelming. It’s three-dimensional.
It’s all around you. All of your senses draw you in—sight, sound, taste, smell, and touch—as well as
your feelings and your thoughts. But you are really sitting quietly inside looking out at all these
objects. Just as the sun does not leave its position in the sky to illuminate objects with its radiating
light, so consciousness does not leave its center to project awareness onto the objects of form,
thoughts, and emotions. If you ever want to re-center, just start saying “hello” inside, over and over.
Then notice that you are aware of that thought. Don’t think about being aware of it; that’s just another
thought. Simply relax and be aware that you can hear “hello” being echoed in your mind. That is your
seat of centered consciousness.
Now let’s move from the small screen to the big one. Let’s study consciousness using the example
of a movie. When you go to a movie, you let yourself get drawn in. It’s part of the experience of
watching the movie. With a movie you use two senses: seeing and hearing. And it’s very important
that these senses synchronize. You wouldn’t get as involved in the film if they didn’t. Imagine if you
were watching a James Bond movie and the soundtrack didn’t synchronize with the scenes. Instead of
getting drawn into the magical world of the movie, you would remain very aware that you were sitting
in a theater and that something was wrong. But because soundtracks and scenes normally synchronize
perfectly, movies capture your awareness and you forget that you’re sitting in the theater. You forget
your personal thoughts and emotions, and your consciousness gets pulled into the film. It’s actually
quite phenomenal to contemplate the difference between the experience of sitting next to strangers in a
cold, dark theater versus being so absorbed in the movie that you are totally unaware of your
surroundings. In fact, with an engaging film, you may go for the full two hours without any awareness
of yourself. So the synchronization of sight and sound is very important if your consciousness is to
become absorbed in the movie. And that’s just two of your senses.
What will happen when your experience of a movie includes smell and taste? Imagine that you’re
experiencing a film in which someone is eating and you taste what they taste and smell what they
smell. You would surely get caught in that one. The sensory input has doubled and therefore the
number of objects drawing on your consciousness has also doubled. Sound, sight, taste, smell, and we
haven’t mentioned the big one yet—would you even go to a theater that has touch? When they get all
five senses working together, you don’t stand a chance. If they all synchronize, you’ll be completely
absorbed into the experience. But then again, not necessarily. Imagine you’re sitting in the theater, and
even with this overwhelming sensory experience, you still become bored with the movie. It just isn’t
capturing your attention, so your thoughts start to wander. You begin thinking about what you’ll do
when you get home. You start thinking about something that happened to you in the past. After a while,
you’re so lost in your thoughts that you’re hardly aware that you’re watching a movie. This occurs
despite the fact that your five senses are still sending you all these movie messages. This can only
happen because your thoughts can still occur independently of the movie. They provide an alternative
place for the consciousness to focus.
Now imagine that movies are made that not only engage the five senses, but also make your
thoughts and emotions synchronize with what’s happening on the screen. With this movie experience,
you’re hearing, seeing, tasting, and suddenly you begin feeling the character’s emotions and thinking
the character’s thoughts. The character says, “I’m so nervous. Should I ask her to marry me?” and
suddenly insecurity wells up inside of you. Now we have the full dimension of the experience: five
physical senses, plus thoughts and emotions. Imagine going to that movie and getting plugged in.
Careful, that would be the end of you as you know yourself. There would be no object of
consciousness that is not synchronized with the experience. Any place your awareness falls would be
part of the movie. Once the movie gets control of the thoughts, it’s over. There is no “you” in there
saying, “I don’t like this movie. I want to leave.” That would take an independent thought, but your
thoughts have been taken over by the movie. Now you are completely lost. How will you ever get
As scary as it sounds, that is your predicament in life. Because all of the objects you’re aware of
are synchronized, you get sucked in and are no longer aware of your separateness from the objects.
The thoughts and the emotions move in accordance with the sights and the sounds. It all comes in, and
your consciousness gets totally absorbed in it. Unless you’re fully seated in witness consciousness,
you’re not back there being aware that you’re the one watching all this. That is what it means to be
The lost soul is the consciousness that has dropped into the place where one human’s thoughts,
emotions, and sensory perceptions of sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell are all synchronized. All
these messages come back to one spot. Then the consciousness, which is capable of being aware of
anything, makes the mistake of focusing on that one spot too closely. When the consciousness gets
sucked in, it no longer knows itself as itself. It knows itself as the objects it is experiencing. In other
words, you perceive yourself as these objects. You think you are the sum of your learned experiences.
That is what you would think when you go to one of these advanced movies. At such a movie, you
would first get to select which character you want to be. Let’s say you decide, “I’ll be James Bond.”
Okay, but once you push the button, that’s it. The button had better be on a timer! You, as you currently
know yourself, are no longer there. Since all of your thoughts are now James Bond’s thoughts, your
entire existing self-concept is gone. Remember, your self-concept is just a collection of thoughts about
yourself. Likewise, your emotions are Bond’s and you are watching the movie through his visual and
auditory perspective. The only aspect of your being that remains the same is the consciousness that is
aware of these objects. It is the same center of awareness that was aware of your old set of thoughts,
emotions, and sensory input. Now someone turns off the movie. Immediately, Bond’s thoughts and
emotions are replaced with your old set of thoughts and emotions. You’re back to thinking that you’re
a forty-year-old woman. All the thoughts match. All the emotions match. Everything looks like, smells
like, tastes like, and feels like it did before. But that doesn’t change the fact that it is all just something
consciousness is experiencing. It is all just objects of consciousness, and you are the consciousness.
What differentiates a conscious, centered being from a person who is not so conscious is simply
the focus of their awareness. It’s not a difference in the consciousness itself. All consciousness is the
same. Just as all light from the sun is the same, all awareness is the same. Consciousness is neither
pure nor impure; it has no qualities. It’s just there, aware that it’s aware. The difference is that when
your consciousness is not centered within, it becomes totally focused on the objects of consciousness.
When you are a centered being, however, your consciousness is always aware of being conscious.
Your awareness of being is independent of the inner and outer objects you happen to be aware of.
If you really want to understand this difference, you must begin by realizing that consciousness
can focus on anything. That being the case, what if consciousness were to focus on itself? When that
happens, instead of being aware of your thoughts, you’re aware that you’re aware of your thoughts.
You have turned the light of consciousness back onto itself. You’re always contemplating something,
but this time you’re contemplating the source of consciousness. This is true meditation. True
meditation is beyond the act of simple, one-pointed concentration. For the deepest meditation, you
must not only have the ability to focus your consciousness completely on one object, you must also
have the ability to make awareness itself be that object. In the highest state, the focus of consciousness
is turned back to the Self.
When you contemplate the nature of Self, you are meditating. That is why meditation is the highest
state. It is the return to the root of your being, the simple awareness of being aware. Once you become
conscious of the consciousness itself, you attain a totally different state. You are now aware of who
you are. You have become an awakened being. It’s really just the most natural thing in the world. Here
I am. Here I always was. It’s like you have been on the couch watching TV, but you were so totally
immersed in the show that you forgot where you were. Someone shook you, and now you’re back to
the awareness that you’re sitting on the couch watching TV. Nothing else changed. You simply stopped
projecting your sense of self onto that particular object of consciousness. You woke up. That is
spirituality. That is the nature of Self. That is who you are.
As you pull back into the consciousness, this world ceases to be a problem. It’s just something
you’re watching. It keeps changing, but there is no sense of that being a problem. The more you are
willing to just let the world be something you’re aware of, the more it will let you be who you are—
the awareness, the Self, the Atman, the Soul.
You realize that you’re not who you thought you were. You’re not even a human being. You just
happen to be watching one. You will begin to have deep experiences within your own center of
consciousness. These will be deep, intuitive experiences of the true nature of Self. You will find that
you are tremendously expansive. When you start to explore consciousness instead of form, you realize
that your consciousness only appears to be small and limited because you are focusing on small and
limited objects. That’s exactly what happens when you’re focusing solely on the TV—there’s nothing
else in your world. If you pull back, however, you can see the whole room, including the TV.
Likewise, instead of just focusing so intently on this one human being’s thoughts, emotions, and
sensory world, you can pull back and see everything. You can move from the finite to the infinite. Isn’t
this what they’ve been trying to tell us—Christ, Buddha, and the great saints and sages of all time and
all religions?
One of these great saints, Ramana Maharshi, used to ask, “Who am I?” We see now that this is a
very deep question. Ask it ceaselessly, constantly. Ask it and you will notice that you are the answer.
There is no intellectual answer—you are the answer. Be the answer, and everything will change
Title: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on October 22, 2018, 02:10:06 PM

When Aldous Huxley, Dying of Cancer, Left This World Tripping on LSD, Experiencing “the Most Serene, the Most Beautiful Death” (1963)

The “spiritual adepts” of Tibet’s modern period, writes Huston Smith in his comprehensive introduction to the Bardo Thodol, or “The Tibetan Book of the Dead”, “were inner-world adventurers of the highest daring, the Tibetan equivalent of our astronauts—I think it is worth coining the term ‘psychonaut’ to describe them. They personally voyaged to the furthest frontiers of that universe which their society deemed vital to explore: the inner frontiers of consciousness itself, in all its transformations in life and beyond death.”

Western modernity—its energies focused entirely on shaping, subduing, and expropriating the material world—did not begin to take such complex inner journeys seriously until the 20th century. When it did, it did so largely through the popular influence of pioneers like Aldous Huxley and Timothy Leary, who introduced the inner journey through a syncretism of Eastern spirituality, Indigenous religious practices, and psychotropic drug use—something of an accelerated course to the frontiers of consciousness for those who had failed for so long to investigate its limits. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on November 03, 2018, 12:19:21 PM

Learn About Your Mind: Self-Hypnosis 101

Phillip J Watt

    Nov 2, 2018

I just want to speak to you right now.

How’s your mind going? Forget your outside world for a moment, and think about how you feel inside. You taking care of yourself? You organizing your mind wisely?

Those questions are introspective, which is a process we should commonly do for ourselves. Like. Every. Day.

Because when we undertake introspection – which can result with many epic and more mundane rebirths – we’re attempting to create more order out of the chaos, regardless if that order sometimes results as chaos in disguise.

In other words, we’re witnessing the stories that are so hardwired into us and then hopefully changing them according to our conscious will.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on November 09, 2018, 02:42:07 PM

November 8, 2018

Gary Z McGee, Staff Writer
Waking Times

    “To find a mountain path all by oneself gives a greater feeling of strength than to take a path that is shown.” ~Karen Horney

Find the nearest mirror. Look deeply into it. There, hidden within that fabulously flawed human being staring back at you, is the greatest teacher you will never know.

Yes. It’s yourself. And yes, you will never really know it.

The famous inscription at the Temple of Delphi, “know thyself,” is ultimately unattainable. But that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try to obtain it. Enlightenment is equally unattainable, but there’s nothing wrong with striving for it. Self-improvement is still healthy regardless of the fact that you will never be perfect. Socrates’ dictum still stands: “The unexamined life is not worth living.” (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on December 02, 2018, 08:59:47 AM

Your Shadow Self: How To Face It, Bring It To Light & Transcend It
November 30, 2018

By Milan Karmell

    The Facts:We all carry a darkness inside that we wish to keep hidden from ourselves and others. Without understanding and facing it, we remain unaware of it.
    Reflect On:Are you open to meet your own totality without setting conditions for this essential encounter? Are you willing to face your own darkness in order to truly transcend it? (
Title: People Know When They are Dead, Can be Aware of Their Surroundings
Post by: azozeo on December 05, 2018, 06:33:26 AM

The question of what happens when we pass away has been one of the most compelling, common sense questions a human being could ask, for as long as we have existed from what we can tell. What is more important than what happens after we leave this life? Unfortunately an uncertainty about this seems to be something every single person has to go through.

It feels like a common sense thing to have faith that something happens after this life: how would we exist now if we didn’t go somewhere when we leave this place? How could we even have peace on Earth without believing in some kind of existence after this one? Some people believe in reincarnation, some believe in a kind of heaven or even hell for people who harm others or go against some moral codes that certain people believe in, sometimes as part of a religious belief system.

Some people hold the bleak belief that when you pass away, your consciousness is fully gone forever, and you simply cease to exist. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on January 05, 2019, 04:48:20 PM

The Voice Inside Your Head

By Steve Taylor, Ph.D.

Guest writer for Wake Up World

When did the voice inside your head start talking? I became aware of mine at about the age of 15. Up till that point, I had been a very happy and carefree child, but in a short space of time, I became acutely self-conscious and socially awkward. There was a commentator inside my head, observing and criticizing my actions. My behavior could no longer be spontaneous or natural, because I was thinking too much. At night, I sometimes found it difficult to get to sleep, because there was so much “thought-chatter” inside my head.
Title: The new science of inner speech - Science Validates Collective Intention
Post by: azozeo on January 11, 2019, 10:31:38 AM

    The Facts:Quantum science today is showing us that our collective thoughts and intentions can have an impact on our physical world and environment.
    Reflect On:What does this mean when exploring the reality of ourselves? Or exploring the reality of how we can create change on our planet?

Can thought, intention, and emotion influence the physical world? Many people believe that they can, but scientific models for testing and quantifying this idea often fall short. Classical physics has been very successful at understanding the physical nature of the universe, yet this world-view assumes that reality is limited to matter. This leaves classical physics ill-equipped to measure or quantify non-physical phenomena. This has led to a movement towards post-material science. If you experience intuition and other non-physical phenomena, you will be excited to learn that science is beginning to validate this realm. You will be inspired to explore the quantum ways that you are connected with the entire universe.

Spiritual practices like meditation, qigong, and yoga were considered forms of science long before Newton inspired classical physics. Quantum Physics flirts with realms of mystery that were traditionally reserved for mystics. There is no need to be on the sidelines as an observer because there are a few very interesting research projects happening in the interstices between science and spirituality which we will explore below. Today we have an unprecedented opportunity to participate in this historic process that integrates physics, consciousness, and group meditation. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on March 16, 2019, 12:55:09 PM

How to Practice Mirror Work: 6-Step Guide

February 2nd, 2019

By Mateo Sol

Guest writer for Wake Up World

Mirror work is strangely confronting, undeniably intimidating, a little embarrassing … but also profoundly healing.

Of all the inner work practices available to us in the 21st century, mirror work is one of the simplest and most powerful. You don’t have to go out and splurge money on loads of spiritual or self-help paraphernalia (thank god) – all you need to do mirror work is a mirror – that’s it! And nearly all of us already have access to one.

If you’re looking for a new psychological or spiritual tool to add to your repertoire, look no further than your bathroom mirror.
What is Mirror Work?

Mirror Work was a method originally developed by inspirational teacher Louise Hay as a way of getting in touch with the inner self. The primary purpose of mirror work is to develop self-love, self-care, and a more meaningful relationship with others. By simply looking into the mirror for a certain amount of time each day and gently talking to yourself, you can foster a more compassionate and forgiving connection with yourself.
I Feel Uneasy Sitting in Front of the Mirror – Why?

I have a challenge for you:

Go sit or stand in front of the mirror in your house for five minutes. Simply stare at yourself and hold eye contact. That’s all you have to do.

Now tell me how you feel.

If you’re like most people, you will feel uncomfortable. You may feel awkward, unsettled, embarrassed, emotional, or other feelings like self-loathing and criticism arise.

Why does this happen?

As Louise Hay writes in her book Mirror Work: 21 Days to Heal Your Life:

    The mirror reflects back to you the feelings you have about yourself. It makes you immediately aware of where you are resisting and where you are open and flowing. It clearly shows you what thoughts you will need to change if you want to have a joyous, fulfilling life.

In other words, in front of the mirror, there is no hiding. In front of the mirror, we catch an intimate (and sometimes painful) glimpse into the relationship we have with ourselves.

Mirror work can make us feel initially uneasy because it exposes our inner critic in plain daylight. Suddenly everything we feel about ourselves that we might not be aware of comes to the surface. And if you haven’t developed a compassionate relationship with yourself, you might be prone to believing all the nastiness whispered by your inner critic.
Mirror Work and Reconnecting with the Inner Child

Another reason why mirror work can make us uncomfortable is that it exposes vulnerable parts of our inner selves. Most notably, mirror work can bring us face to face with the child within us.

We all possess an inner child – it is one of the many archetypes (or forms of energy) that compose our personality structures.

When looking into the mirror, it’s not unusual to feel waves of sadness wash over you. I know that when I’ve experienced this despondency, it has been from my inner child pleading for my attention.

But although looking into the mirror can be upsetting at times, these feelings point to deeper work that is happening. Simply gazing at yourself in the mirror and comforting your inner child can be a tremendously healing practice. The more emotional you feel, the more emotional purging and transformation are happening.
Mirror Work as a Portal Into Your Soul

The eyes are the mirrors to the Soul as the old saying goes, and mirror work gives you direct access to that deeper part of you. But first, the inner work must happen.

Connecting with your Soul doesn’t always happen immediately during mirror work – although it can. Typically you will need to work through your insecurities and self-resentments by practicing self-love before you can feel and sense your deeper inner presence emerge.

But how do you know that you’re reconnecting with your Soul?

I can’t answer that question for everyone. But for me the presence of my Soul emerges when my face softens, my eyes become warmer and more compassionate, a slight smile enters my face, and a lighter form of energy fills my body. Feeling drawn inwards is also another sign.

As magical or mystical as it may sound, using mirror work as a portal to your Soul is actually quite natural. There is nothing phantasmagorical about it – it feels like returning home to the truest, most whole, and wisest part of yourself.
How to Practice Mirror Work (Step-By-Step Guide)

There are no official methods of doing mirror work – although you can try the 21-day practice developed by Louise Hay in her book.

Personally, I prefer to tailor mirror work to myself and my own needs. Here are some of the fundamental principles of mirror work that you might like to keep in mind if you want to create your own practice:

    Use affirmations that feel authentic to you (I’ll explain this more below)
    Dedicate at least five minutes every day
    Do mirror work in private so that you aren’t disturbed (or feel the need to keep your guard up)
    It’s okay to feel emotional – let yourself feel whatever comes up
    Keep a journal where you record any notable experiences (I’ll explain this more below)

With that being said, here is a simple step-by-step guide to mirror work that you can use and adapt to your own needs:
1. Commit yourself

Mirror work creates the deepest changes when it is done consistently over a long period of time. I recommend dedicating a minimum of five minutes a day, with ten minutes or more being ideal.
2. Think about the best time of day

Mirror work is flexible and can work around your schedule. Most people like doing mirror work in the early morning and late at night before going to bed. You can also do mirror work during the day as you pass mirrors. If there are no mirrors in your workplace, you can always use the selfie option on your phone (where you turn the camera towards yourself). You can find a private spot (such as in a bathroom cubicle) to do this exercise while at work.
3. Choose or create your own affirmation

Why use affirmations, you might ponder? Affirmations counteract the negative self-talk that runs through our heads – they also help to reprogram our minds. When we use affirmations, we are affirming something that we like about ourselves or something positive we wish to give ourselves.

You may like to create your own affirmation spontaneously based on how you feel when you look in the mirror. For example, if you feel ugly in that moment of time, you can affirm to yourself, “I have a beautiful heart and soul” or whatever feels most authentic to you. If you feel uncomfortable in your own presence, you can affirm, “It’s okay to feel uncomfortable, I accept myself as I am.”

Alternatively, you can choose from a list of affirmations and experiment with using one affirmation each day (or one for a week). Here are some examples:

    I’m learning to love you
    I’m willing to take care of you
    I love how thoughtful/caring/sincere/____ you are
    I am worthy of love
    I am enough
    I am exactly who I need to be in this moment
    It’s okay for me to feel scared
    It’s okay for me to feel sad
    It’s okay for me to feel awkward
    I love how unique my body is
    I am beautiful
    I am whole
    I lovingly embrace my fears
    I am fierce and strong
    I trust in my natural wisdom
    I am open and receptive
    I believe in myself

There are thousands of affirmations out there – so this is just a little “sampler.”

A note on affirmations: If you are creating your own affirmations, please ensure that you keep them phrased in a positive way. Many practitioners who work with affirmations (such as those who study NLP) assert that the unconscious mind does not understand negatives and will translate any negatively phrased affirmation in reverse. For example, instead of saying “I am not worthless” say, “I am worthy.” Or instead of saying, “I will not be mean to myself” say, “I treat myself with kindness.”

Also, the point of affirmations isn’t to sugarcoat how you feel. If you genuinely can’t say to yourself in the mirror “I love you” then don’t! The point isn’t to be disingenuous, the aim is to offer sincere love to yourself. If an affirmation such as “I love and accept you” feels too difficult, focus on a milder affirmation such as “I am learning to love and accept you” or “I want to love and accept you more.”
4. Repeat your affirmation (with feeling)

Whether out loud or in your head, repeat your affirmation to yourself at least ten times. Louise Hay recommends at least 100 times – but that can seem overwhelming at first. Certainly, the more you repeat your affirmation with sincerity, the deeper impact it will make. So try to set a realistic number and stick to it. You can always increase the number of times you say your affirmation while looking in the mirror as you progress through your practice.

When saying your affirmation, it’s important to look at yourself directly in the eyes. You may also like to use your own name as this sends a powerful message to your unconscious. For example, you may wish to say, “I appreciate how caring you are [insert your name here]”, “I love you [insert your name here].”
5. Embrace any emotions that arise

It’s normal and okay to feel upset. If you feel the need to cry, let yourself – you are releasing old ways of being, and that is powerful work! You may also wish to give yourself a hug, which is also wonderfully therapeutic. It’s likely that you will feel emotional at some point and that is because the old frozen pain within you that has built up through the years is bubbling to the surface. Sometimes the emotions we feel during mirror work are from childhood, particularly if they are intense. If this is the case, comfort your inner child by acknowledging it within you as you look at the mirror. You may wish to say words such as, “It’s okay, I see you, I understand,” “I’m here for you,” “I love how brave you are little [insert name],” etc.

A note about men doing mirror work: Feeling and expressing emotions will likely be more difficult for men than for women. Why? Men are conditioned to perceive being stoic as a true measure of manliness – but the truth is that “stoic” is just another word for emotionally distanced and repressed. There is nothing courageous about avoiding emotions. If you are a man, you will need extra reassurance and compassion through this stage of the work. Have some deep affirmations on hand and the willingness to see your emotional openness as true strength.
6. Record your discoveries

It is important during the course of your mirror work to keep a journal. You don’t need to write long paragraphs about your experiences if that doesn’t suit you – simply write a sentence or two. Record how you feel (even if that means expressing how silly you feel) and what came up. You don’t need to keep a mirror work journal every day, but please ensure that you write down whatever notable experiences you’ve had. Any new emotions, thoughts, discoveries or breakthroughs should be recorded. By keeping a journal, you will be able to track your evolution and progress.
Final Thoughts

Mirror work is deceptively simple but tremendously empowering. So much healing work can be done by simply looking at yourself in the mirror and expressing self-loving affirmations.

One of the most amazing side benefits of mirror work is how it impacts your relationships. By developing more self-love, life becomes more harmonious and your connections with others can improve significantly. It’s true that love for self equals love for others. But you don’t have to believe me – try mirror work yourself!

If you have dabbled with this fascinating tool or are a loyal advocate, share with me your experiences. What part of mirror work is the most difficult for you? How do you overcome those difficulties?
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on March 19, 2019, 11:19:54 AM
Reincarnation – A Case Study

Most of us are familiar with the concept of reincarnation. In fact, a great many truly believe, with others sincerely hoping, that such a concept is very much a reality of human existence. For if it were, not only would it mean that something else awaits us after death, but that for all intents and purposes, each of us is truly immortal.

But what is reincarnation? Is it real? Is it inevitable? Or might reincarnation itself simply be another plateau to experience before the “soul” – whatever that might be – goes on to its next state of existence? Indeed, might reincarnation prove that life itself for each of us is a perpetual journey to be appreciated and mastered from different perspectives and forms of existence? (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on March 19, 2019, 11:21:53 AM

The Pineal Gland: A Modulator of Human Consciousness?

By Tim Bryant

Guest writer for Wake Up World

Often referred to as the third eye, the seat of the soul, or the epicenter of enlightenment; the pineal gland has been something of a mystery when it come to science, yet this small gland in the brain has earned high praise amongst many esoteric/metaphysical schools of thought as being quintessential to spiritual development.

What’s even more fascinating is that the pineal gland is not just an important concept to one or two cultural traditions, but is applauded for extraordinary abilities to raise consciousness among a variety of cultures all over the world.

Not only is the pineal gland a praised tool for spiritual enlightenment, but scientifically it has many special properties that make it quite unique when it comes to the human physiology. Roughly just the size of a pea, the pineal gland not only receives the most blood flow of any organ in the body, minus the kidneys, but it is one of the largest producers in the body of the all important chemical serotonin.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on March 24, 2019, 04:55:29 PM
Before You Can Be With Others, First Learn to Be Alone

In 1840, Edgar Allan Poe described the ‘mad energy’ of an ageing man who roved the streets of London from dusk till dawn. His excruciating despair could be temporarily relieved only by immersing himself in a tumultuous throng of city-dwellers. ‘He refuses to be alone,’ Poe wrote. He ‘is the type and the genius of deep crime … He is the man of the crowd.’
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on April 06, 2019, 03:57:00 PM

Focused Intention

March 22nd, 2019

By Jennie Ankney

Guest Writer for Wake Up World

We want to ask ourselves a question from time to time just to check in. What are we focusing on?

To answer that question let’s look at the manifestation process, or Law of Attraction. If it is true that we create our reality, and it is a function of the collaboration of our thoughts, which creates a feeling and subsequently we are motivated to act and behave in certain ways. And it is also true that we are energy and all energy has a vibration. Then we are vibrating at a specific frequency that then gets broadcasted into the space around us. That energy or frequency tunes into other people or things or even situations that are at that same frequency, and thus we have an attractive force based on our thoughts, feelings and actions…or focus.

Our focus is entirely under our command. We choose what to focus upon. Sometimes that can still be like holding an open firehose, right?

It has a mind of its own.

I can’t get a saddle on my mind chatter.

This is more common than not for many of us. We are distracted by so much input and possibilities in our modern world. There is chaotic energy pulling our focus in many directions. We have even found reasons to blame other people or objects for what we are creating with the vibration we are pulsing out by the focus we are holding. When we take full responsibility for our vibration and resulting experiences, we grab our focus back onto the experiences we want to create vs. random creation/focus. We give ourselves back our personal power.

Look at how powerful TV has become.

We sit down, relax and gaze our focus upon the programming on TV. This is passive focus.

We allow our focus to be dragged in and out of our selected program to focus upon advertising for businesses with a lot of money to spend. They have control of our focus. And depending upon what program we chose, that program also has our focus and is making suggestions about us and the world around us.

When our focus is so relaxed as it is when we watch TV or movies, these suggestions are quite powerful because our brains are at the ready to be programmed in that relaxed mode. This is the place we want to get to during meditation. This is where we practice being the observer. Practicing no thought. This is a powerful focusing tool. Imagine the seeds you can plant when in this relaxed state. You have the power to change your life in what ways you see fit.

If we allow our focus to pin ball from one thing to the next, like TV programming and advertising, our energy is chaotic and the overall net vibration we are pulsing out creates more chaos. Do we want to start utilizing that power of our focus to our benefit?

What do we want to focus on?  What do you want to focus on?

If what we focus on expands, then this is where we decide what we want for our lives. We are here to create things in our lives that are enjoyable or even thrilling!  Not more chaos, right? Let’s set our intention on harmony, and we may want prosperity for ourselves and our loved ones too. Take the time to sit down and figure out what you want to create in writing – writing it out gives your creations more power. And we’re all about personal power.

Our practice of intentional focus can include the following steps:

    Thoughts help us to describe the visuals and how we want to feel. Writing this down is another way to solidify our intentions. Starting with gratitude can put you in a good mood right away, even if you are in a terrible mood at the start. Ask me how I know?
    Feelings are in the NOW moment. How we feel is always NOW no matter if we are remembering feelings from the past, or if we worry about the future. Best choice yet is conjuring our feelings for an expectant future. This is where being more childlike, making it fun and playful is where it is easy to get excited and dream big. Miracles happen when we are happily expectant of an amazing outcome. Why not set a trend where the miraculous becomes ubiquitous? We can all practice this gratitude and contentment for a future with an assured best outcome. It’s a great collective goal!
    Action uses the body. When you follow inspiration and act on it, you are already in a great space because you are in the receiving mode of an inspiration. Meditation is another intentional action that is very powerful. This tool takes practice. Staying in the NOW moment and being the observer, where there ultimately will be no thought. You just start where you are and practice your best. Give yourself permission to make this a priority in your life.

Have you figured out what you have been focused on?

Is that your intention?

Perfect! Every NOW moment you have a chance to keep choosing something to focus on that is working for you. You can also make mistakes, as we all do, and choose another focused intention, preferably learning from those mistakes as we go along. There are no punishments for making mistakes. When we give ourselves permission to ask for forgiveness from ourselves or others, we give ourselves compassion. This opens our hearts to be more compassionate to others. What if everyone on earth decided to do that?

That would be some miraculous awesome-sauce!!
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on June 05, 2019, 12:15:03 PM

Intuitions Is The Highest Form Of Intelligence, According To Psychologist

By Mayukh Saha / Truth Theory

According to Gerd Gigerenzer, who works at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, true intuitiveness is having the necessary instinct to understand what knowledge we need to focus on and what we can afford to forget.

In his work ‘Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious’, Gerd explains how intuition and rationality can go hand in hand by using himself as an example. While immersed in his research, he often gets a hunch which he usually takes forward because he just knows that it will give him the answer. But he also double checks using scientific formulae to actually figure out the reasons behind his hunches. But when it comes to personal matters, he goes solely by what his intuition tells him.

So where does intuition stand? It hasn’t been formally recognized as intelligence. What does that mean for a person who has a sharper intuition than most?

Intuition is a form of intelligence but it needs to go along with other facts. Those who already possess intellectual curiosity and are willing to work hard to learn more are definitely intelligent. You can’t just sit around and wait for knowledge to strike you. The drive to explore a topic and look at all its aspects is necessary. When your intuition gives you a hunch then, that is definitely a form of intelligence and a very important one at that.

One way to understand intuition is by looking at it as having a grasp on collective intelligence. If we look at the way the world wide web is put together, the organization of sites depends on intuition so that users are able to have a better understanding of their working and can easily find their way around. It took years to develop this concept of removing unnecessary information to be understood. The internet used to be fairly chaotic earlier.

According to Theo Humphries, for a design to be true based on intuition, it must be capable of being understood even when there are no tutorials. Users must be able to get a sense of it because it must be part of the collective intelligence that we all share.

When intuition and discipline go hand in hand, extraordinary results can be achieved. The basics of any subject need to be learned, logic must be sought after, and your intelligence needs to be exercised for your intuition to be truly powerful. The more you study, the sharper your intuition will be. You can’t just laze around and then be offended when others aren’t trusting of your gut instincts because they’re then just a shot in the dark.

Over 5000 people have downloaded our free ebook “Growth Hacking Tips And Rituals For Optimal Living” CLICK HERE to get your free copy now

Most of us would have heard of Einstein’s theory on intuition. He believed that intuition was a gift and rationality a servant. Society tends to praise the servant but it forgets that the gift exists. There are times when your rationality can lead you down the wrong path so you’ll need your intuition to bring you back on track. If you feel like something is wrong, it is your intuitive mind warning you that you need to think in a different manner.

Those who are intelligent pay attention to these warnings. The best among us use this gut instinct to take big risks and they are the ones who are truly successful. Disciplining your intuition is the key.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on June 07, 2019, 08:15:53 AM

Ex-Government Physicist Shares What He Knows About ‘Activating’ ESP (Psi) Dreaming

    The Facts:Dale E. Graff, a physicist and former director of the US government/Stanford remote viewing program shares his knowledge about dreaming, and how we can all experience what he calls ‘Psi’ dreaming.

    Reflect On:How much have our governments and black budget programs really discovered within these realms? How much is known and why are they keeping it classified?

The most astonishing fact about studies within the realm of parapsychology (Psi) is that they are often shunned by the mainstream media and this comes despite the fact that they have extremely high amounts of credibility within the realms of academia. Parapsychology deals with phenomena like pre-cognition, remote viewing, telepathy, mind matter interaction, and more that fall under the label of extra sensory perception (ESP), and the truth is, there is no reason why these topics should not be studied openly within the mainstream. Why is it that they are ridiculed in that realm, but have been studied at the highest levels of government for decades with high amounts of success and credibility? The US/Stanford University STARGATE project is one of many examples that confirm parapsychology’s legitimacy. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on June 08, 2019, 06:16:28 PM

Russian Military Colonel Publishes An Article Claiming Human & Animal Telepathy Is 100 Percent Real
June 7, 2019

By Arjun Walia

    The Facts:The Russian Ministry of Defense published an article about the existence of military parapsychology in Russian military techniques, which allows one to penetrate into the thoughts of another, hack computer programs, and communicate telepathically.
    Reflect On:Why is this type of science studied at the highest levels of various governments, yet ridiculed and not studied at all within the mainstream?

Is telepathy real? It’s hard to argue against it; in fact, I would say that it’s not really up for debate. That being said, when it comes to topics like these, the field is polluted with a bad reputation given its association with magic, superstition and ‘pseudoscience,’ terms that often come from those who condemn the subject without ever really looking into it. The evidence for the existence of telepathy is actually quite overwhelming, and in many cases, much stronger than most other areas of science.

Dr. Jessica Utts is a great person to bring up, as I’ve done many times before, to hammer this fact home. She is the  Chair of the Department of Statistics at the University of California, Irvine. In 1999, she published a paper showing how the statistical significance with regards to results seen from studies under the realm of parapsychology (telepathy, remote viewing, etc) are stronger than some of the studies used to approve some medications. In a recent interview, she emphasized the following.

    “What convinced me was just the evidence, the accumulating evidence as I worked in this field and I got to see more and more of the evidence. I visited the laboratories, even beyond where I was working to see what they were doing and I could see that they had really tight controls… and so I got convinced by the good science that I saw being done. And in fact I will say as a statistician I’ve consulted in a lot of different areas of science; the methodology and the controls on these experiments are much tighter than any other area of of science where I’ve worked.” (source)

Why is it that these topics are not touched by mainstream academia, yet studied at the highest levels of government? Multiple governments all over the world have been studying this phenomenon for decades, and a lot has been declassified. Take the remote viewing program that was conducted by the US government/CIA and Stanford University, for example.

After its declassification in 1995, or at least its partial declassification, the Department of Defense and those involved revealed an exceptionally high success rate.

    To summarize, over the years, the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods, and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the [remote viewing] phenomenon. (source)

The latest example comes from Russia, as their Ministry of Defence recently published an article about the existence and study of parapsychology within the Russian military. The article explains how these techniques are and were used to penetrate the thoughts of the enemy (mind-reading) as well as to hack into enemy computer systems. The article is titled “Super Soldier for the Future Wars” and was published in the Defense Army magazine.

The article was written by Colonel Nikolai Poroskov, who explained that they use parapsychological techniques like telepathy for combat purposes, revealing secrets, disclosing locations, etc… He even discloses that Russian specialists have learned telepathy by working with dolphins.

As a note to readers, we here at Collective Evolution do not condone the use of animals for any type of experimentation. There is no information on the conditions of these experiments, but we are assuming they were captured for military purposes, which is extremely sad and heart-breaking.

Poroskov writes:

    “They mentally gave the animals the commands that they carried out. Similar practiced by the famous trainer Durov. The technique, as it turned out, is applicable to humans. Moreover, the impact was even possible on the technique. With an effort of thought you can, for example, shoot down computer programs, burn crystals in generators, eavesdrop on a conversation, or break television and radio broadcasts and communications. Good luck ended with such experiments as reading a document lying in a safe, even if it is in a foreign language that we do not speak; identification of individuals belonging to the terrorist network; identifying potential candidates for terrorist groups,” the statement reads. (source)

Quite astonishing, isn’t it? Parapsychology seems to be the largest known threat to any type of secrecy, doesn’t it? I found the reference to hacking computers quite interesting. Can telepathy really be used for purposes like hacking electronic equipment? I did some more digging and found an interesting document inside of the CIA’s electronic reading room with regards to the Soviet Union.

Here’s a quote from the document:

    The Soviet Union is well aware of the benefits and applications of parapsychology research. In 1963, a Kremilin edict apparently gave top priority to biological research, which in Russia includes parapsychology. The major impetus behind the Soviet drive to harness the possible capabilities of telepathic communication, telekinetics, and bionics is said to come from the Soviet military and the KGB. Today it is reported that the USSR has twenty or more centres for the study of parapsychological phenomena, with an annual budget estimated in 1967 at over 13 million dollars and reported to be as high as 21 million dollars.

Today, we know that trillions of dollars have gone into black budget programs in the United States, many of which likely deal with parapsychology, as they have in the past.

The document also states:

    There are reports that the Soviets are training their cosmonauts in telepathy to back-up their electronic equipment while in outer space. One of these back-up schemes is known to involve coded telepathic messages. This method was previously demonstrated in March 1967, when a coded telepathic message was flashed from Moscow to Leningrad. The involvement of astronauts or cosmonauts in telepathy experiments is not necessarily unprecedented. In February 1971, during the Apollo 14 flight to the moon, astronaut Edgar Mitchell made 150 separate attempts to project his thoughts from inside the space capsule back to an individual on earth. The results of the Apollo 14 experiments have been well-documented in detail and are published in the Journal of Parapsychology. (source)

Deeper Black Budget Discussion On CETV

Again, these programs lie within the realm of the black budget and are highly classified. Who knows how far ahead of the mainstream world they truly are?

CETV is a platform we created in order to combat the censorship and demonetization we have been facing over the past few years. On episode 4 of The Collective Evolution Show on CETV, we discussed the black budget in much greater detail. Below is a clip exploring the missing money from the black budget and special access programs, explaining where the money is going and what exactly it’s being used for.

You can become a member of CETV, get access to the full show and many others, and support conscious media (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on July 28, 2019, 09:41:53 AM

ABC 13

DURHAM, North Carolina — For almost 85 years, the Rhine Research Center in Durham near Duke University has served as a place for parapsychology. It was started by J. B. Rhine, a professor at Duke.
The center studies forces of light, magnetism, electricity, visualization, extrasensory perception (ESP) and other categorical behaviors.

If you’ve ever been thinking of someone and then they coincidentally call you on the phone, that’s a degree of unconscious ESP, according to the center’s executive director, John Kruth.

“We study something called PK or psychokinesis,” Kruth said. “And ‘Stranger Things,’ Eleven has this ability to crush things — Coke cans with her mind. Maybe she throws people across the room. We don’t see things that extreme. But we do see things where people have effects on physical objects just with their intentions.”

Part of the center’s study of ESP is done using Zener cards. Test subjects are shown five different cards with shapes on them and their goal is to correctly guess which shape is on the corresponding card.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on August 07, 2019, 04:34:09 PM

A free flowing question and answer session related to consciousness and ascension. For me it felt like a session connection because I remembered very little of what was discussed until I listened to it the next day as I processed it. I am happy to be of service in this way and I hope it assists those engaging with the information.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on August 11, 2019, 10:00:32 AM

Channeling is the least reliable source of information, yet the most novel source for inspiration. The intellect alone is unable to make the kind of creative leaps that only channeling can provide. To be clear, intuition and sudden epiphanies are instances of channeling where some higher objective source beyond the intellect is momentarily tapped to provide an answer before the explanation is evident. Quality channeling combined with diligent research can make for excellent results, especially if one has keen intuition to make creative connections bridging the two.

Problems arise when the channelled material itself is inferior, research is shoddy, discernment nonexistent, or intuition is lacking. In fact, that is begging to be deceived. The reason why channeling is often of poor quality is that those who receive it lack the discernment to qualify what comes through. Sacrificing their standards of what constitutes quality, people often settle for what they can get. Soon as the channeled source satisfies their skepticism, soothes their insecurities, or strokes their ego they go no further. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on August 11, 2019, 02:42:19 PM
This "ain't" your grandpa's solar system anymore. Be careful what you wish for & manifest....

Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on August 16, 2019, 09:24:36 AM

Science Discovers Two Types of Intuition, How Can You Learn to Master Each for a Fulfilled Life?


(Stillness in the Storm Editor) Intuition, gut-feelings, or what some call “psychic downloads” are well acknowledged by science. Humans naturally experience what seems like automatic and magical insights, things that often guide our decisions or our conclusions about the world. But unlike what many think, intuition isn’t some unexplained magical power, it has roots in acknowledged science.

It can be argued that there are two different types of intuition, body intelligence, and heart intelligence.

These are terms I’m coining here and now for discussion purposes, based on my years of research into psychology and extra-mind phenomenon, what is known as parapsychology in academic circles.

Intuition of the body intelligence type are insights, impulses, or downloads we receive based on past experience.

For example, if you burned your hand when you were a child, as you reached for a hot pan on the stove, you’ll receive an instinct to be more cautious when you’re near hot stovetops. This form of intuition is one that is fairly well recognized by mainstream science, we might also refer to it as a reflex. This is something the body learned how to do as a result of actual experience, a kind of animalistic wisdom stored literally within your physical tissue or flesh. The benefit of this type is that you can retrain your instincts in the present by being conscious and intentional with your actions.

Body intelligence is obviously very useful, however, it’s hardly perfect. The systems that govern this type of intuition are ancient, lymphatic and reptilian neurological structures we inherited from our animal ancestors. Animals are creatures largely motivated by emotions, and as such, your body intuition also has the ability to supply you with emotional insights as well. As a matter of fact, part of your emotions are just reflecting back to you how you feel about something in your field, based on how you’ve defined it in your personal life, what I call your personal knowledge database.

PTSD, in this sense, is an extreme example of what happens when this body intelligence intuition system breaks down, triggering fight or flight responses when we don’t need to be on alert. This underscores that intuition is not perfect, it requires careful discernment and thinking to really know if what is offered is true or valuable.

Intuition not only tells us what might be happening or what exists (truth insights) it also tells us what we should do (value insights).

Value intuition encourages us to do something, which is more of a kind of instinct or impulse. It’s still a kind of body intelligence, and as such, this kind of intuition isn’t perfect because it draws from the past. Our values grow and evolve with time, but our mind can’t get stuck in the past sometimes.

For example, when you feel a strong impulse to eat your favorite sugary food, despite the fact you’re trying to lose weight, this is an example of a past value asserting itself in the present, known as cross-purposing. It’s arguable that without discernment, you might be led astray by this limited past-based intuition. Cognitive dissonance of this type is best handled by using the power of the conscious mind to examine the basis of each insight, working to attach yourself to the one that best aligns with your highest values and ideals.

The second type of intuition is less understood. I call this heart intelligence, a term coined by the Heartmath Institute.

The Institute conducted an experiment wherein they hooked up measuring instruments to participants brains and hearts, measuring their responses to images randomly selected on a viewing screen. Something completely unexpected happened. The data showed that the hearts of participants started to react to certain images five seconds before they were randomly selected by a generator. This proves, with empirical scientific results, that the heart has some kind of precognitive capacity—it can anticipate the future in some sense.

What’s interesting is that the reaction recorded was in agreement with the value systems of the participants. That is, the future reaction was based on how the patient presently saw the world, not how they would see it in the future. This distinction is important because it suggests the emotions we experience are more a measure of who we are now than who we could become in the future. Your emotions, unlike what some believe, might not be a “higher level” source of information, what some call a soul insight, or at least they aren’t infallible.

This latter point is controversial because it seems to go against what some people believe in various new age circles, namely that one can be led totally by their emotions and ignore reason and logic all together.

Despite the implications of this finding, the overall premise that emotions and intuition can reveal much about ourselves still holds true.

All of this is helpful insofar a self-mastery because once we realize our insights are a kind of holistic readout of who we are now, we can use them as a guide to shape a more ideal life.

In this way, what I’ve called the Ideal Self method is the quest to realize higher and higher states of fulfillment, joy, and bliss through seeking to know yourself (now) while carefully making choices so as to guide your evolution in the future.

Related Consciousness Hacking | The Ideal Self as Tool For Growth — Higher Self, Ideal Self, Ego Self and Shadow Self (Video)

– Justin

(Exploring Your Mind)

Source – Exploring Your Mind

by Staff Writer, July 27th, 2019

The neurobiology of intuition and the science that studies it say that it’s more important than ever now. In a world that’s often chaotic and complex, knowing how to hear that inner voice can help you make better decisions.

The neurobiology of intuition exists and we’ve learned something very interesting about it. Most people base a lot of the decisions they make on their gut feelings. It’s basically just an inner voice in touch with your identity and everything you’ve seen, felt, and experienced. Your intuitive side can actually be an amazing tool if you make good use of it.

Let’s admit it. Intuition can often guide you to invisible universes, it can connect you to a part of yourself that inhabits the most hidden corners of your subconscious. It can feel so strange at times that you might think it isn’t a very scientific experience. It must be mystical because there’s no obvious logic to it. But that isn’t exactly true.

Buy Book The 5 Personality Patterns: Your Guide to Understanding Yourself and Others and Developing Emotional Maturity

Intuition is really our sixth sense, and there’s a lot of scientific literature about it. For example, there are fascinating books such as Educating Intuition by Robin M. Hogarth and Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking by Malcolm Gladwell.

In these books and many others on the topic, they argue for the importance of intuition as a resource. They say that it can actually complement analytical thought.

Then there are researchers such as Jonas Salk, who became well known in his time for inventing a polio vaccine. This doctor wrote a thought-provoking article in 1983, called “The Merging of Intuition and Reason”. In it, he talked about how we should be using our sixth sense in our daily lives because it can help us make better decisions.

    “The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.”

    -Albert Einstein-

What Does the Neurobiology of Intuition Have to Say?

First of all, the neurobiology of intuition suggests that these mental processes aren’t all in our imagination. They actually have a neurological foundation. Doctor Keiji Tanaka from the RIKEN Brain Institute led a fascinating study to try and find some answers to what happens in our brains to create this sixth sense.

To figure that out, he used some experimental study subjects: expert shogi players. The game is very similar to chess, and the most skilled players use their intuition to make some amazing moves. Dr. Tanaka also performed a series of MRIs on this group of people to see which parts of their brain they were using the most.

Buy Book I Am Your Mirror: Mirror Neurons and Empathy
The Precuneus

According to his scans, the area of their brains that lit up most was the precuneus. This is a little part of the superior parietal lobe, which also happens to be right on the line between the right and left brain hemispheres.

The precuneus plays a role in episodic memory and visual-spatial processing. But most interesting of all, it plays a role in consciousness.
The Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex

Another interesting area that lit up when they were using the intuitive parts of their brain was the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. This is a key part of our brains. Why? It’s where we store all of the information on past rewards, along with the pain of mistakes, or things we wish we hadn’t done so that we would have avoided experiencing something negative.

Famous neuroscientist Antonio Damasio figured out how important this part of our brain is in the decision-making process. The most interesting thing about this brain structure is that it responds based on emotions.

Buy Book Hypnagogia: The Unique State of Consciousness Between Wakefulness and Sleep

Third Eye (Healing Tonic): Powerful Nootropic, Supports Pineal Function, Melatonin Regulation, Dream Activation, (Handcrafted in small batches) the perfect blend of mushrooms and herbs made from scratch! Use Promo Code SITS20 for 20% discount on this and other products in your order. Third Eye, on Sale NOW!

Here’s an example. Imagine you meet someone at a party, who then invites you to go back to their place. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex will do a fast analysis based on your past experiences.

There could be something about their personality, appearance, or speech that makes you skeptical of them. This is because they remind you of someone you had a negative experience with. From there, it will send out an alarm to get your attention. That’s your intuition trying to make its way into your conscious mind.

Once you’ve heard that inner voice, you have two options. You can either listen to it or send it through the filter of analytical thought if you want to examine it more carefully.

The Caudate Nucleus

Scientific studies on the neurobiology of intuition have also emphasized the caudate nucleus. It’s a structure that’s part of the basal ganglia, which plays a role in learning, habits, and automatic behaviors.

Basically, the caudate nucleus speeds up the sixth sense to help you make quicker, almost automatic decisions based on your previous experiences or learning.

    “Don’t let the noise of other’s opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.”

    -Steve Jobs-

As you can see from all this information, it’s hard to chalk all these processes up to accidents or a product of our imagination. Not only is there a neurological foundation to intuition but it also involves your past experiences, your personality, and your subconscious, or the place that contains the essence of who you are.

Gut feelings aren’t just pseudoscience. They’re actually a mechanism that has helped to define who we are as humans of all genders, races, and cultures. This is really worth thinking about. You should always listen to that inner voice and use your ability to think analytically about things when you need to.

Buy EFA Complete with Optimal Omega 3 6 9 Levels of High Potency Flax Oil, Fish Oil, Borage Oil, and Evening Primrose Oil 800mgs

Stillness in the Storm Editor: Why did we post this?

Psychology is the study of the nature of mind. Philosophy is the use of that mind in life. Both are critically important to gain an understanding of as they are aspects of the self. All you do and experience will pass through these gateways of being. The preceding information provides an overview of this self-knowledge, offering points to consider that people often don’t take the time to contemplate. With the choice to gain self-awareness, one can begin to see how their being works. With the wisdom of self-awareness, one has the tools to master their being and life in general, bringing order to chaos through navigating the challenges with the capacity for right action.

– Justin
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on August 25, 2019, 03:59:52 PM

The ancient Egyptians may have used infrasound to create altered states of consciousness in the pyramids.

The Egyptian pyramids are miracles of construction and scientific achievement, which is even more amazing when you consider that they were built thousands of years ago, long before we had the extensive knowledge that has been acquired over centuries.

But were the pyramids also constructed to produce sound waves that would literally alter consciousness and produce a mystical, out of body experience in anyone who was inside the structure?

As Ancient Origins explains, infrasound (sometimes referred to as low-frequency sound) is known to directly affect the human brain: (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on August 31, 2019, 03:02:30 PM

3 Ways to Experience “Dadirri” in Nature

By Mateo Sol

Guest writer for Wake Up World

“Dadirri. It is inner, deep listening and quiet, still awareness. Dadirri recognizes the deep spring that is inside us. We call on it and it calls to us … When I experience dadirri, I am made whole again. I can sit on the riverbank or walk through the trees; even if someone close to me has passed away, I can find my peace in this silent awareness.

“My people today recognize and experience in this quietness the great Life-Giving spirit, the Father of us all. It is easy for me to experience God’s presence. When I am out hunting, when I am in the bush, among the trees, on a hill or by a billabong; these are the times when I can simply be in God’s presence. My people have been so aware of Nature. It is natural that we will feel close to the Creator.” – Miriam Rose Ungunmerr-Baumann, Aboriginal teacher and artist

Ever since I learned the meaning of the word dadirri in a conversation I was having with an Australian aboriginal friend of mine, I immediately fell in love with its significance. I was teaching him about ‘Pachamama‘ (what we call mother nature in Quechua) and other of my indigenous ways of looking at the world, while he was teaching me about his.

Nature is one of the best healing and teaching environments that has been used by every indigenous culture to reconnect with God, or with the Divine. In a time where we are so materialistically centered, it is unsurprising that we often take for granted a gift that is so freely available.

It’s easy to forget that we don’t own nature, but we are a part of it.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on September 04, 2019, 02:32:56 PM

If you crave those last few minutes of your benefit-rich yoga class when you settle into savasana for stillness and relaxation, meet your new best friend: the little-known practice of yoga nidra. An ancient practice to tame the nervous system, you’ll find your mind in a more collected, peaceful state as a result of the exercise.

So what does a yoga nidra session look like? At first glance, the practice may seem like nothing more than lying on the floor wrapped up in super comfy clothing and blankets. (And socks. You’ve got to wear fuzzy socks.)

But there’s a power in stillness. And modern-day science is catching up to what yogis have known for ages: yoga nidra, also known as yogic sleep, improves your health, and in all sorts of surprising ways.

Hint: Many who practice yoga nidra report feeling fully rested in as little as 30 to 120 minutes of practice. That’s a lot shorter than the eight hours of sleep usually required for that type of restoration. And then there’s the 65 percent dopamine boost. More on that later…plus, there’s a free guided yoga nidra relaxation below, too.
What Is Yoga Nidra?
Title: The Sacred Ground of Being…The Quintessence of Who We Are
Post by: azozeo on September 12, 2019, 10:49:20 AM

September 9th, 2019

By Open

Contributing writer for Wake Up World

We are amidst the most phenomenal shift of consciousness in the history of our planet, and of humanity’s journey on it. Day by day the external drama seems to ratchet up another notch. With climate crisis, environmental degradation and the bankruptcy of the governing system, the shadow side is illuminating itself in all its outrageous lunacy. In this outer turmoil, it is utterly essential that evolving people have some inner ground, a mast, to which to anchor centred consciousness, so as to find peace, serenity, and to step forth into the world with aligned authentic decision making. It’s essential therefore, that we continually access what’s termed our “Sacred Ground of Being”…
The Universal Torus
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on September 21, 2019, 12:49:47 PM

You Were Lied To – You Do Exist
September 13, 2019

From the moment you came out of your mother’s womb, you were still connected to light, to God, to the universe, to everything. Where the mind couldn’t process, all of your senses were working overtime. Love filled your heart and curiosity consumed you.

Then it began. Life took hold, and with every breath, a new word, a new idea, and a new perception were thrusted into your mind. They weren’t your own, but you digested them as best you could. The teachers played their roles, parents followed what they were taught, the radios buzzed with noise, and televisions blasted you with imagery to fill your databank.

Before long, you were doing as told, obeying the rules, staying on everyone else’s schedule, and studying what you were told to learn. By the time you began forming deep thoughts of your own, you had been stripped of your senses, primarily your sixth sense. That connection experienced as a baby was a distant memory. You were now part of the system, the indoctrination, the inevitable sleight of hand, being groomed by those who weren’t the wiser.

One day, your mind was swirling with endless ideas about the world, and you dared to discuss it in school, or maybe at home. But you were quickly brushed off because these very ideas did not align with what others had been taught and instructed to teach. How could they respond or discuss that which they themselves could not comprehend or even begin to entertain? So, you stuffed it away and became more disconnected.

Perhaps you lived through the hippie era, only to find that this free-spirited vibe was being stomped out by those who wanted to keep these secrets sacred and to themselves? They created the legend of drugs and freeloaders to remove the shine from the free spirits trying to promote peace and find their way back to the lost connection. Not that drugs weren’t used of course. Or maybe you were making your way through the “new age” movement, such as they liked to call it. Their way of assigning labels, to box up everyone as crackerjacks, and once again shun spirituality and the deeper connection. They even groomed and constructed gurus, so with each movement, more followers could be deemed as crackerjacks.

The Yogis had their calling as well. Yoga studios were popping up on every corner and people were buying up packaged classes faster than they could hire instructors. Soon, it too became the talk of “ultra-spiritual” people going overboard with their spirituality, thinking they were all “Zen,” just to discount another movement. The crystal bowl meditations quickly made their rounds, and off to tinfoil hats again. Always trying to stomp out the bliss.

Again and again they infiltrated and created movements to control a twisted narrative that would steer people away from this connection – this profound inner/outer connection. They were certain to leave those pages blank throughout your years of education. And while they had everyone idolizing gurus, actors, musicians, and so-called famous people, they drew you further and further away from yourself, while telling you how to think, what to believe, and how to be.

Were you one of the lucky ones? Were you a child that remained so strongly connected that all of your senses broke through all bounds, you saw through clear lenses, and you felt everything? Everything. Did you catch the illusions? Did you hear the words coming out of mouths while hearing the real truths masked by the words? Did you feel their souls contradict their minds? Did you see the energy in all things as it vibrated its way through discourse? Could you touch their heart without physically moving? Did you ride the waves of light through time and space wondering how this veil, so thin, is so disguised to many? Did you wonder why those around you seemed so disoriented, disheartened, and disconnected? Did you wish you could escape the veil of transparency, or did you wish you could ride that wave forever?

There is resonance in vibration – truth engrained in all forms – powerful light within all beings. Those that knowingly and unknowingly stole that from you, are not the enemy. The enemy is yourself. For those who continue to deny that which is in every living vessel, to shun it, to shake it, to refuse to acknowledge it – you are hiding from your own shadow. For some, this connection is frightening, because it has been buried for so long, it’s like welcoming a stranger into your most intimate existence. For others, it is the fear of waking up. Just as those who find it difficult to wake up from the illusions and falsehoods presented on this earth plane, they find it more difficult to wake up to the intangible plane that their soul longs for.

Yet, here you are. You are waking up to the realities, the illusions, the falsehoods and lies, while trying to discern what is truth, what to shed, and what to seek. And in this very moment, you can make the choice to greet your soul with a recognition, a faith, a belief, that you are an all-powerful being, connected to the light that carries with it a vibration that can offer you the comfort you seek, with undeniable discernment, compassion, and intuition that will provide you with clear lenses moving forward. A connection to a higher consciousness that cannot be unseen, unfelt, or turned off, once that reconnection is made.

You have been lied to. There is another world that exists. Strip away all the labels, the “movements,” the gurus, and the naysayers – YOU are the other world. Each and every one of you. And it’s a glorious world – a world where all of your innate, God-given higher consciousness exists. It was with you, in you, a part of you all along.

Welcome home. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on September 22, 2019, 05:55:09 PM

This episode of AAE tv is from the September 2018 Awake And Empowered Expo in Downtown Detroit, MI USA featuring Vibrational Geneticist Jeilene Tracey. Discover how to tune and activate the Pineal to act as a signal transducer. Jeilene offers wisdom from many of the ET councils she channels as well as channeled light-coded vibrational tones to activate the brain and body's electromagnetic system. The activations in this video, can be used remotely from home.

About Jeilene Tracey
Jeilene Tracy is a Vibrational Geneticist, who works with tones and light language to make shifts at the cellular, epigenetic, and DNA level. Working with multidimensional beings, she harmonizes and adjusts the physical DNA to its crystalline DNA counterpart in order to shift the physical, mental, and emotional body into a state of coherence and health.

Jeilene works with ascended masters, Arcturians, and a Mantis collective. She serves as an ambassador to a benevolent group of Mantis beings who are here to teach humanity how to heal themselves and assist with Gaia’s ascension. The Mantis utilize a heart based vibrational field to repair and optimize DNA to bring humanity into alignment with earth’s frequency. As human beings release density, energetic imprints, and heal past traumas, they accelerate the ascension of both humanity and Gaia.

Jeilene received her degree in Biology from Smith College with an emphasis on Molecular Biology, and spent 15 years in the biotech industry working for cutting edge start-ups focused on revolutionizing healthcare through novel ways of understanding human genetics and the microbiome. Today she uses her understanding of DNA and the microbiome, in conjunction with sound, to assist individuals to alleviate a variety of physical, mental, and emotional concerns. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on October 11, 2019, 01:33:32 PM

This Is Why Your Attitude Is More Important Than Your IQ


By Mayukh Saha / Truth Theory

What is the right determinant of success? Most would say intelligence. After all, we have been taught that intelligent people are often smart and can find their way in life quite easily. They will race to their goal faster and more efficiently than those who have less IQ and are less intelligent. However, a study at Stanford University claims that it is not IQ but the attitude that can be a determinant of success.

According to researcher and psychologist, Carol Dweck, people have two kinds of mentality: growth and fixed mindset. A person with a fixed mindset knows that they cannot change their ways and so, when challenges come up, they resist and use the same methods again. However, a person with a growth mindset changes, takes conscious effort to improve themselves. A person with a growth mindset can outperform a person with a fixed mindset multiple times – even if they have a low IQ.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on October 15, 2019, 12:09:31 PM

by Tommy Tutalo,
Contributing Writer,

Finding that quiet peaceful setting to get some work done seems ideal for the average person, but for some the chaos and the background noise can heighten their concentration.

So why is that? Why is it that some people can concentrate better with the background noise? Is it because they are conditioned to focus better under such conditions due to a past experience, their environment or is it something more, something engrain deep within the psyche and the subconscious. There are untapped realms not only within the human body, mind and soul, but also within the nature of reality. The connection between the two seems to be magic behind why some people can concentrate with chaos and background noise.

Everything in life is vibration and has an energetic code wired into it. In today’s word we are surrounded with technology and stuff that can be distracting to the eye and ears. We are constantly in a space which can feel suffocating due to all the material and inanimate objects around us. Not only is the space in which we lived crowded with stuff but the noise pollution seems to be even louder and consuming. This can create an energetic disorder in the space we occupy.

Technology plays a part in this. We are connected to our cellphones, no matter what public place you walk into there is either music playing or a television is on, or sometimes both. In public spaces there are also the crowds of people and even in our work space we are not alone. Yes for some they are able to work from home or find a quiet space, but are you ever really alone and is there ever really silence.

Some crave solitude and silence when working while for others they are able to work within the noisy environment that surrounds us. It is interesting how this can be that someone can have so much going on around them, the music playing, the news on the television playing in the background, crowds of people around talking, laughing, yelling, sirens, horns, airplanes passing by and even the sounds of nature, are no distraction to some who can get work done under such conditions.

This is what I call stimulated concentration. I’ve witness this during the 10 plus years I’ve worked in the education system in classrooms with special needs students who have many disorders such as autism, Asperger’s, oratory sensory disorder, and many other conditions. Although some students needed silence and solitude, I’ve witnessed a lot of these children who couldn’t function within a quiet calm classroom setting. They were able to focus and get work done with either background music, white noise, or sometimes with talking from other students or teachers who were around them. Others fidgeted around with stress balls, stuffed animals or a pencil. Now this is just a small percentage of people who can work under such conditions.

For me as a writer I am only able to focus and concentrate in café’s and public places. That background noise and distraction that comes from people, technology, and the world around seems to stimulate my mind and help me concentrate more. Maybe it’s because I need to concentrate because of all that is going on, but personally I feel that there is something more going on, something that connects a person to all happening in the space they are in.

The nature of reality I feel plays a part in this. Knowing that everything in life is vibration, I feel that by connecting with the same frequency of all that is around you that, that is what is able to help make concentration possible. I’ve had many experiences where certain people would come into the café I am writing in and if I’m on the same wave length, and can feel good vibes, I can get lots of good writing done. There have also been many other times when I have had been distracted due to the fact that I can feel a disconnection with, who just by their presence were able to prevent me from getting any effective writing done. The vibrations and frequencies from us didn’t match and created this disorder, I like to compare this soul connection to being in the presence of someone who you adore or love and viseversa with someone who is hateful and evil.

In5D Tie Dye Shop - in5d.NET

There is a secret language woven into the nature of reality and because of this that is how the idea of stimulated concentration can work for some and not others. Those who can make that soul connection with the vibrations of reality all around them and connect can concentrate and get some work done, while those who do not have that connect can not concentrate.

So embrace stimulated concentration, the little side distractions, the inanimate objects and the flow of the crowds, you never know what thoughts may fill your mind or how productive you may be able to be. For those who crave silence, and empty space all around that is ok, that’s just the way you are wired and how you are. No matter which works for you know that you must embrace whatever form of concentration you choose you use.

About the author: Tommy Tutalo is an independent author, writer, photographer, painter, and visual artist, whose work is considered to be diverse, and universal. A native of West Orange, New Jersey, Tommy comes from a hardworking, and loving blue-collar background, and grew up in an ethnically diverse community. Both Tommy’s up-bringing, and the melting pot he grew up in have been two influential factors in his life and the arts. At an early age Tommy discovered a love for both the arts and the beautiful game, soccer. Soccer would become Tommy’s outlet and craft, which he would nourish and pursue, putting the arts off as secondary. Tommy’s hard work ethic, devotion, and perseverance with soccer, would enable Tommy to play at a very high level during his adolescent years, becoming one of the most decorated and recognized players in New Jersey, and eventually sought by, and play for The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, where he would win a DIV. III National Championship with the 2001 team. This would be the pinnacle of Tommy’s soccer career, and the foundation for the next phase in his life. As one door shut, another door opened, and Tommy would then pursue the arts, learning many different art mediums during, and after graduating from college, with a Bachelor of the Arts degree, Art History, and by any means devote his life to living as an independent artist and author.  Website: ( (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on October 18, 2019, 08:06:49 AM

Mindfulness Meditation Helps Process Fearful Memories

Participating in an eight-week mindfulness meditation program appears to alter how the brain processes fear memories. In a study that will appear in the November 1st print issue of Biological Psychiatry, a team led by Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) researchers report that mindfulness meditation appears to help extinguish fearful associations.

A common way to treat anxiety disorders is to expose patients to the cause of their anxiety in a safe environment until it no longer elicits fear, a process known as exposure therapy. This exposure provides an opportunity to learn that these causes are not threatening and thereby help individuals regulate their emotional responses. To be successful, first a new memory must be created between the root of the anxiety and a feeling of safety, then the ‘safety’ memory must be recalled when the cause is presented again in a new environment, rather than the original fearful memory.

Mindfulness meditation been proposed to provide an optimal condition for exposure therapy because it involves experiencing the present moment with an open, curious and non-reactive mindset. Numerous studies have documented that mindfulness meditation programs are useful for reducing anxiety, however, the exact reasons were unknown. The current study investigated enhanced learning of the ‘safety’ signal as one way through which mindfulness can help individuals learn to adapt more positively to the causes of their anxiety.

“Mindfulness training may improve emotion regulation by changing the way our brain responds to what we’re afraid of and reminding us that it is no longer threatening,” said Gunes Sevinc PhD, investigator in the Department of Psychiatry at MGH and the paper’s first author. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on October 22, 2019, 01:02:26 PM

Transcendence Through Intuitive Thinking

In this article I will be discussing the philosophical system used to derive the content of my website, the nature of proof, and the importance of intuitive thinking as an effective method of truth analysis. Hopefully this will round out your understanding of what it means to be a truth seeker and satisfy anyone wondering how I derive my material.
The Binary Fallacy and the Misappropriation of Intellect

The intellect is overrated and underrated because few understand its true purpose. In truth the intellect is a passive tool that evolves a given input towards an output according to certain rules and takes a premise toward its logical conclusion. But like a computer it passively carries out its programmed function without true creativity of its own. What the intellect produces depends on two things, its input and programming, both of which originate from outside itself and are therefore unguarded sources of corruption. As the saying goes, garbage in garbage out: with a corrupted input comes corrupted output. And even with perfect input, if the rules are incomplete or sloppily applied then the output is likewise garbled. So for all its virtues, the intellect alone is insufficient for effective truth seeking.

The problem with overrating the intellect comes from thinking that through accurate application of the rules one can produce an accurate output, which ignores the possibility of incomplete or false input. In practical terms this implies that intellectuals, or let’s say stubborn skeptics who pride themselves on scientific objectivity, refuse to question the root assumption from which they are logically reasoning. These root assumptions originate with statements made by potentially fallible sources of external authority like group consensus, prolific academics, university curriculums, and irrational biases rooted in financial and social survival that embed themselves into institutional policies. When confronted with truths that contradict these, rather than revise incomplete or false assumptions, intellectuals use them to rationalize away counter-examples and counter-reasoning, thereby misappropriating the intellect into fortifying the walls of their mental prison.

Those who notice the limiting nature of intellectualism might make the counterpart fallacy of under rating it. They wish to transcend reason by disposing it in favor of the only alternative, feeling. Feeling does not obey logic, therefore it can go beyond logic. While that much is true, the error comes in not distinguishing between intuition (flowing from our higher aspects) and emotionalism rooted in lower aspects like animal instinct, ego biases, sentimentality, subconscious programming, collective consciousness, or external telepathic persuasion. This attempt to abandon intellect instead gives it a new job by merely switching the inputs and removing the need for consistency in applying the rules. What results is an intellect that rationalizes subjective impulses in ways that are not even logically consistent.

What underrating and overrating the intellect have in common is that they arise from the binary fallacy: “If not 1, then 0. Since 2 is not 1, 2 is 0.” Above reason is intuition, below reason is emotionalism, and through the binary fallacy intuition and emotionalism become indistinguishable because neither is based in reason. Meanwhile, those who overrate the intellect also commit the binary fallacy by confusing what is beyond their comprehension with what is beneath their standards of logical integrity, rejecting both for being different and unsubstantiated by their own understanding. These are two sides of ignorance, two manifestations of the intellect being unable to accommodate solely those inputs that would lead it toward higher objectivity. Either it stubbornly rationalizes its current level of objectivity against higher levels of objectivity beyond its understanding, or else it rationalizes away objectivity altogether in favor of subjectivity.

The binary fallacy therefore boils down to recognizing only objectivity and subjectivity, choosing between solely these when there exists a third option that transcends both. For lack of a better term, we may call this third option transjectivity, meaning that which is trans-objective. This is what I meant earlier by “higher levels of objectivity.”
Degrees and Levels of Objectivity

How can there be different levels of objectivity? Science aims toward increasing degrees of objectivity, toward increasingly accurate understanding reality, whereas by different levels of objectivity I am referring to different levels of reality, not just the level we know as physicality. The problem with the term objective is that it implies “that which is real” when what we call reality is actually a localized phenomenon whose characteristics depend on what locations you span within the greater framework of existence. It depends on the level within that framework that forms the foundation of your current realm of experience. So there is an important distinction between degrees and levels of objectivity. Gaining a higher degree of objectivity means getting a more accurate understanding of what level of reality you are currently exploring, whereas gaining a higher level of objectivity means gaining an accurate understanding of an altogether higher level of reality. This matters because while logic alone can bring you to higher degrees, intuition is needed to reach higher levels.
The Limitations of Scientific Proof

When it comes to scientific research and proof, exploration is into phenomena that carry a factual existence independent of the observer, quarantining it from psychological bias and delusion. But by limiting proof to what is universally replicable, what remains are solely those phenomena comprising the lowest common denominator of experiences available to all observers inhabiting a consensual reality. In other words, scientific proof is strictly material proof that depends in no way upon the individualized conscious or spiritual state of the observer. Thus scientific proof encompasses the crudest set of phenomena that are undeniably real to individuals with even the crudest levels of conscious development.

Scientific standards do not allow for personal proof that depends on the observer, and yet it is precisely the conscious development of the observer that determines what other levels of reality beyond the purely physical and deterministic can be accessed. The closest science has come is in quantum mechanics where it is now commonly accepted that the observer plays a unique role in the outcome of an experiment. But beyond verification of the statistical trends describing the distribution of all possible observations in a given experiment, any particular outcome is not universally replicable. That is why quantum physics, in not being able to predict any specific observations, must resort to statistical descriptions because in doing so it once again approaches collectivity and thus what it defines as objectivity. Even so, the exact influence of the observer on a quantum system is not understood, and thought to be random as well as being limited solely to the atomic scale.

That’s as far as modern science goes. Yet seasoned researchers of fringe knowledge and battle-hardened experiencers of the strange know that transjective phenomena also operate on the macroscopic scale and depend on the quality of consciousness and spiritual orientation of the observer. Synchronicities and the correlation between attitude and attracted experiences are some examples. We are not just observers of reality, but active participants endowed with freewill to choose to transcend our realms by going above and beyond our prior assumptions. Inexplicable events happen, and we can either rationalize it away with assumptions and rules programmed according to our collective mainstream reality, or we can figure it out within ourselves and leave the herd in the dust.
Accessing Transjective Proof

Levels of objectivity are arranged concentrically like small circles inside larger ones, with the lower levels being subsets of the higher. The smallest circle is physicality, the most illusory level of reality, while the largest circle is one “whose center is everywhere and circumference is nowhere” because it is absolute and infinite. Relative to the absolute, observations and truths are but assumptions and half-truths. It is only within a particular level of objectivity that the assumptions and half-truths defining that level become objective observations and truths for its inhabitants.

Once you access a higher level of reality, proof within it becomes fully objective to you, but that proof cannot be gathered by someone who lacks access to that level. Your personal proof would at best represent for him a possible transjective truth because it supersedes what he considers objective. But he might commit the binary fallacy in mistaking it for mere subjectivity on your part because he cannot replicate or substantiate it with his current knowledge or methods of investigation. Considering that each of us are in the same position with respect to transjective truths from levels of reality higher than our own, it is necessary to employ a method of truth analysis that can guard against subjectivity without simultaneously eliminating access to transjective truths. That method requires a certain amount of mental and intuitive finesse to understand and apply, but it will be explained fully in the proceeding discussion about the nature and place of logic and intuition.

Logic alone is enough to increase the degree of objectivity because old assumptions are merely being taken toward increasingly intricate logical conclusions. Then progress is made into unexplored rather than unfathomable territories, and what increases is the refinement rather than evolution of knowledge. This is drawing a circle and pouring effort into exploring the bounded territory rather than widening the circle itself. As soon as the perimeter is drawn, everything within is already delineated. This forms the enclosed set from which any further discoveries are made, meaning such discoveries are far from new; they instead follow directly and predictably from the old. The process is deterministic, that is to say, the old directly determines the new. Those who cling solely to this objective approach are fortifying their ignorance when they stubbornly seek to justify existing assumptions and observations rather than revolutionize them with more expansive ones.

We must transcend the delusion of subjectivity and the ignorance of objectivity. To be subjective means to deny the reality of the level you are inhabiting. To be objective means to fully acknowledge and understand the reality of your level but go no further. To be transjective means to shift to a higher level of objectivity altogether, one that forms a superset of the old level. If sound logic and sharp observation is needed to overcome subjectivity and reach objectivity, then those two plus the additional faculty of intuition is needed to overcome objectivity and reach transjectivity, to break through the barrier of previously limiting assumptions.
Logic and Intuition

The road to transcendence is traveled via intuitive thinking, which may also be called nonlinear or nondeterministic thinking. Whereas deterministic thinking proceeds from the old to generate the new, meaning the new is just an extension of the old and therefore not new at all, intuitive thinking allows one to feel out the new and revise the old so that previous assumptions are overturned to become extensions of the new. Intuitive thinking is therefore the only way to reliably come up with anything truly new because it gives you newfound vision.

What is intuition? The common understanding likens it to instinct or internalized knowledge that can be used to achieve correct results without having to think. A familiar example would be software or electronic devices said to have an intuitive interface; what that really implies is that the interface makes use of pre-programmed mechanical tendencies so that the user does not have to learn or think to make it work. But that is just another form of determinism, albeit one that does not necessitate logical thinking, just programmed reaction whether the programming is academic, social, or biological. Nothing new is done or discovered this way, it is all about accessing new forms of the old without active application of the intellect. The only similarity between real intuition and this common misunderstanding is that both achieve correct results without initial involvement of the intellect.

No, real intuition does what the intellect alone cannot: sense truths that do not follow directly from the old assumptions, old logic, or old programming. Truths accessed by intuition are therefore transjective. Intuition can point you to flaws in prior assumptions, help you notice new observations that were otherwise missed, and present new possibilities to contemplate.

Real intuition comes from beyond. Whatever determines your current realm, your current body of assumptions and programming — intuition originates from beyond that. If you are a product of the past, intuition is a feedback flow from the future. If you are the lower self, intuition comes from the higher self. If you are operating from the five senses, intuition comes through the sixth. So it is an influence that comes from beyond, that beckons you beyond, versus influences that come from the lower self, the collective physical reality, and genetic programming that solicit you into rationalizing away the new for being unsupported by the old. Intuition is your internal compass magnetized to absolute truth, that if followed takes you through ever greater levels of objectivity and thus through ever more advanced realms of existence. It is the thread that leads you out from the maze of illusions, it is the heart of your soul, the voice of your spirit, and it only speaks as clearly as you have ears to hear and the mind to listen.

With intuitive thinking, intuition is the guiding hand of logic. Logic alone is incapable of determining the absolute value of anything because it deals in binaries and the relation between them: premise versus conclusion, subject versus object, congruent versus divergent, rational versus irrational, or cause versus effect. But what decides the premise? What determines the first cause? Who decides what is rational? What determines objective truth? Not the intellect; it only acknowledges and obeys them after they have already come into existence. Intellect takes what it is given and follows through with it. In the absence of intuition, it takes orders from group consensus or physical signals, hence the “nature versus nurture” debate, which is another binary fallacy that fails to include the transjective possibility of spiritual factors. Logic without intuition puts intellect in the business of reinforcing biases rather than uprooting them.

On the other hand, intuition without logic leads to vague impressions that never become accurate expressions or communicable understanding. The intellect is also necessary to avoid confusing intuition with emotionalism; the latter being subjective, its commands will have holes, self-contradictions, discoverable motives that are less than reasonable, and consequences that you can already foresee would be unpleasant. As mentioned, those who discard the intellect have no means to distinguish between the two. They get caught up in a self-made world of illusion that is wholly at odds with the objective reality they reside within.
Intuition as an Absolute Gauge

But why exactly can intuition do what logic alone cannot? What exactly goes on when you intuitively sense whether an idea is true or false? In intuitive thinking, the truth value of an idea is felt directly rather than determined through its relation to other ideas. By turning within and consciously focusing on a thought, awareness of your surroundings momentarily fades away and the separation between you (subject) and the thought (object) disappears as well so that both overlap into a single entity: yourself-as-the-thought.

It is the same process that leads to empathy when you internally observe yourself-as-other. In empathy, you feel internally what another person feels, which is only possible if you set aside your separate self and your personal circumstances and step into their shoes and see them relative to themselves. With intuitive thinking, you step into a thought and feel it relative to itself, or rather you feel yourself-as-the-thought relative to yourself-as-absolute-truth. The core of your being, the source of your intuition as well as that which observes itself in the process of self-awareness, is your most reliable absolute truth reference point because you can absolutely verify the truth of your own existence by noticing yourself notice yourself. By stepping into a thought you can feel whether there is resonance or dissonance between yourself and the thought in question, thereby comparing the thought to not just another idea originating from outside yourself, but to an absolute truth anchored at the very core of your being. Its truth value can therefore be estimated by how much it resonates with your being. Then, in using your intellect to thoroughly investigate ideas that resonate, you asymptotically approach absolute truth by reaching ever higher levels of objectivity. Deep resonance indicates the presence of truth.
The Process of Intuitive Thinking

Intuitive thinking is only possible through deep contemplation. Stitching together a patchwork of other people’s ideas is not sufficient to move forward in a revolutionary way. If you really want to figure things out, take time to contemplate deeply. This involves focusing inward to become ever more sensitive to your intuition, ever more capable of discerning between genuine intuition and subjective bias. It also involves cranking up your intellect to follow through with the suggestions intuition provides, to look for holes and inconsistencies, to unravel an intuitive “thought ball” into words clear enough for others to understand. I recommend getting a blank notebook to brainstorm and work things out in a freestyle manner since putting ideas down on paper frees up the mind to tap into the next batch of intuitive impressions and allows an instant survey of progress.

Good intuition and good thinking leads to good truth analysis. If an idea feels off, then find out exactly why it feels off. If an idea feels right, then find out exactly why. You are not finished until you clearly understand the intuitive impression, have logically dissected it, and can convey it accurately in words. Doing so is a divine act because it gives clear voice to spirit. It is really an internal communion, a nonverbal socratic dialogue between the lower self and the higher Self. You turn within, pose the question, feel out the possibilities, investigate the results, correct misunderstandings, apply them, test them, revise them, learn from them, ask and receive, feel out and figure out, realize and transcend.

Intuition provides answers to questions after the intellect has dutifully exhausted a line of reasoning and humbly bows in request of assistance. Logic can only go so far before it hits an impasse, a discontinuity where what comes after cannot be logically deduced from what came before due to limitations in prior assumptions and observations. That is when intuition throws a rope from the other side, so that intellect can deduce what came before from contemplating what possibly comes after. It is a backwards process, but it works and is a perfect example of how intellect obeying intuition moves one toward a higher level of objectivity. After having made use of the rope, following through by logically analyzing and unraveling an intuitive impression is equivalent to building a solid bridge across the impasse so that in the end, what was formerly a discontinuity is now a continuous path that can be logically followed forwards or backwards. That is because higher levels of objectivity are supersets of lower levels, and to derive a superset from the subset is impossible while the reverse is more than natural.

After intuition results in an epiphany, everything you thought you knew realigns slightly so that the answer to a previously befuddling question becomes smack-your-forehead obvious. Intuitive thinking therefore leads to logically self-consistent results even if the intervening process momentarily abandons logic for intuition when encountering an impasse. Intuitive thinking can do everything that strict logical reasoning can, but unlike the latter it can also transcend itself. The condition is that you logically follow up on an intuitive impression, which may be nothing more than the most resonant and best-fitting guess, even if your current observations, experiences, and assumptions do not yet prove it directly. If your intuition is correct, then in following and testing it you will encounter new observations, new experiences, and revised assumptions that prove it. But this type of transjective confirmation must come after-the-fact. Since intuition comes from beyond, the proof of its validity is accessed by going beyond.

And that is the true scientific method, where a hypothesis is proposed first and then tested. Too many scientists and skeptics irrationally reject “far out” hypotheses before investigating them solely because these “wild assertions” are not yet supported by prevailing assumptions. They are afraid to take a single step without the certainty of group consensus and the absolute confirmation of all prior steps, and so they are barred from accessing higher levels of objectivity and instead rationalize away transjective influences. Intuitive thinking is more scientific than modern science because it does not allow the scientific method to be restrained by limitations irrationally imposed by old assumptions. It is the way of the gnostic intellectual rather than the agnostic rationalist. Intuitive thinking is the true science of transcendence.

Further Reading

    Truth Analysis — a short article of mine detailing the practical steps I use to apply intuitive thinking toward figuring things out. It was written a couple years ago and only briefly touches on some concepts that were more fully explored in the current article.

    The Philosophy of Freedom (also published as Intuitive Thinking as a Spiritual Path) by Rudolf Steiner — this book gets to the core of intuitive thinking, freewill, and transcendence. Steiner wrote it in a manner meant to exercise both intuition and the intellect, thus it is very difficult to read and understand. I had an easier time figuring out these same concepts myself through intuitive thinking than deciphering them from the book, and only afterwards did I get what Steiner was talking about since I had already reasoned it out on my own. Still, it is a rewarding work for anyone looking for a mental and intuitive workout, and the concepts it covers have far-reaching implications.

    Greater Community Spirituality by Marshall Vian Summers — a more readable, comprehensive, spiritual, and practical approach to intuitive thinking. In this book, real intuition is termed Knowledge with a capital “K” and made the cornerstone of what amounts to a fourth density STO philosophical system where listening to the heart, the voice of spirit, is essential to making wise choices in the challenging times to come. The wisdom and advice given in this book is true to my experience, so I recommend it for all truth seekers. (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on October 24, 2019, 11:34:03 AM

October 17, 2019

Steve Taylor, Ph.D., Guest
Waking Times

In the 1840s, a Scottish doctor living in India named James Esdaile was frequently visited by men with enormous tumours (weighing up to 45 kg) in the scrotum, caused by mosquito bites. The operation to remove them was so painful that men would often put it off for years, only having it as a last resort.

Esdaile had read about hypnotism (or mesmerism, as he referred to it) and decided to try the technique as a way of relaxing patients, so that they would agree to have the operation.

To his surprise, he found that not only did the patients feel relaxed, but they also didn’t feel any pain during the operations. In other words, hypnosis had somehow acted as a powerful anaesthetic. Esdaile reported that, in some cases, there was no pain or injury after the operation either, and that the healing process was faster. As he wrote, “less constitutional disturbance has followed than under ordinary circumstances. There has not been a death among the cases operated on.”

Word began to spread about this amazing surgeon who could remove the massive tumours in 20 minutes without pain or after effects, and soon patients began to flock to Esdaile’s hospital near Calcutta. Esdaile began to use hypnotism in other procedures too, including eye surgery, the removal of tonsils, breast tumours, and childbirth. Esdaile was sure that it wasn’t a matter of his patients pretending (to themselves and/or to him) that they weren’t feeling any pain — he noted that, in addition to a lack of writhing and moaning, patients didn’t display physiological signs of pain such as changes to pulse rate and eye pupils.

At the time Esdaile was practising, mortality rates for operations were massive: a staggering 50% of patients died during or after them. But in 161 recorded cases of Esdaile’s operations, the mortality rate was only 5%. The reasons for this aren’t clear. Esdaile himself believed it was due to “vital mesmeric fluids” passing from him to the patient, which stimulated the healing process. However, it was probably related to reduced loss of blood, and perhaps an activation of the same self-healing abilities that occur with a placebo.
The Hypnotic State

The hypnotic state is still mysterious — there is no clear explanation of what happens when a person becomes hypnotised, or how the state is different from normal consciousness. But the essential aspect seems to be that, under hypnosis, the normal conscious self becomes immobilised. Normal conscious functions such as volition and control are taken over by the hypnotist. And with the conscious self in abeyance, the hypnotist appears to have direct access to the person’s subconscious mind.

Certainly, one of the most striking aspects of hypnosis is the powerful influence of the mind (via the hypnotist’s suggestions) over the functioning of the body.  Esdaile was by no means the only physician to use hypnosis, but from the mid-nineteenth century, the practice was superseded by the use of chemical anaesthetics. But there were still some areas of medicine where the practice continued — dentistry, in particular. At the turn of the 20th century, hypnosis was dentists’ main method of pain management, and it became almost universal for dentists during the First and Second World Wars, when chemical anaesthetics were scarce and facial trauma was common. Even now, some dentists still use hypnosis, especially in cases where a person’s medical history precludes the use of an anaesthetic.

Recent research with patients who had teeth extracted under hypnosis showed that “hypnotic-focused analgesia” can increase pain thresholds by up to 220%. (1) This research also found that 93% of patients experienced reduced postoperative pain and haemorrhage. (This links to Esdaile’s finding that mortality rates decreased very sharply as a result of his use of hypnosis. Hypnosis can reduce blood loss and haemorrhage.)

Beyond its analgesic properties, there is a great deal of evidence that hypnotism can have a powerful healing effect. During the early to mid-nineteenth century, the technique was used by physicians as a treatment and found to be effective against conditions such as epilepsy, neuralgia, and rheumatism. However, hypnosis appears to be particularly effective with skin conditions. In highly suggestible people, hypnosis has been used to rapidly heal wounds and burns, to make warts and blisters disappear and to control the bleeding of haemophiliacs. Conversely, highly suggestible people may produce blisters or burn marks, if they are told by a hypnotist that their skin has been burnt, or if they are blindfolded and the hypnotist pretends to touch them with a red hot poker or another object. (2)
Explaining Healing Under Hypnosis

Even though the effects of hypnosis are unexplained, it seems likely that the analgesic and healing properties of the state involve similar processes to the placebo effect. Research has made it very clear that the placebo effect isn’t just about patients believing that their conditions have improved. Real physiological and neurological changes take place; genuine healing occurs. Recent research (most notably by Dr. Ted Kaptchuk at Harvard Medical School) has found that placebos can have a significant effect even when people know they are taking them.

Both the placebo effect and hypnosis suggest that we have a good deal more influence on our physiological functioning than we usually realise. Our beliefs and intentions seem to be able to activate innate self-regulating and even self-healing powers. A hypnotist simply creates the conditions under which these powers can be activated.

One of the most mysterious aspects is why we don’t have access to these self-regulating powers in our normal conscious state. We can’t simply say to ourselves, “Okay, I’m going to make myself numb to pain” or “I’m going to use my mind’s power over the body to improve the symptoms of my rheumatism or back pain.” We can only use these abilities unconsciously, through the intervention of a doctor of a hypnotist.

For me though, perhaps the most important implication of the regulating and healing effects of hypnosis (and also the placebo effect) are what they suggest about the relationship between the mind and the body. In modern materialistic science, the mind is usually seen as a kind of “shadow” of the brain. Mental activity is a product of — and is equivalent to — brain activity. All mental states can be reduced to brain states.

However, if the mind is just an epiphenomenon of the brain, the powerful physiological effects of hypnosis and the placebo effect don’t make any sense. How could an epiphenomenon bring about such powerful changes to the primary thing that it’s a byproduct of? How can a shadow change the object that it’s the shadow of? To use a different metaphor, it would be equivalent to suggesting that the images on the screen of a computer can change the software of the computer.

In other words, hypnosis and the placebo effect (and similar phenomena such as psychosomatic illness and psychogenesis, when mental intention generates illness) suggest that the mind is not just an epiphenomenon of the brain. In fact, since mental intentions (either our own or a hypnotist’s) can bring about such powerful changes to the body, it seems likely that mind is more fundamental than the material stuff of our bodies.

I believe that our culture urgently needs to adopt a “post-materialist” model of reality, which includes the principle that consciousness or mind are not byproducts but primary qualities of the world. One possibility is panpsychism, which suggests that consciousness is an intrinsic property of all material particles. Another is what I call “panspiritism” which suggests that the primary reality of the universe is a “fundamental consciousness” (or spirit) that pervades all space and all material forms. (See my book Spiritual Science for more details.)

Such post-materialist perspectives are the only hope of understanding rogue phenomena such as hypnotic healing and the placebo effect.
About the Author

Steve Taylor Ph.D is a senior lecturer in Psychology at Leeds Metropolitan University, UK. He is the author of Back to Sanity: Healing the Madness of Our Minds and The Fall: The Insanity of the Ego in Human History and the Dawning of A New Era.

Steve’s books have been published in 16 languages and his research has appeared in The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, The Journal of Consciousness Studies, The Transpersonal Psychology Review, The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, as well as the popular media in the UK, including on BBC World TV, The Guardian, and The Independent.


(1) Facco, E. et al. (2011) Effects of Hypnotic Focused Analgesia on Dental Pain Threshold. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis. 59 (4), 454–68.

(2) Kelly, E. F. et al. (2007). Irreducible Mind: Toward a Psychology for the 21st Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. (
Title: The Busier You Are, the More You Need Quiet Time
Post by: azozeo on November 18, 2019, 02:19:47 PM

Taking time for silence restores the nervous system, helps sustain energy, and conditions our minds to be more adaptive.
Title: The Commodification of Spirituality & Simulated Desires
Post by: azozeo on November 21, 2019, 10:13:41 AM

October 16, 2019

Kingsley L. Dennis, Contributor
Waking Times



the non-physical part of a person which is the seat of emotions and character.

the prevailing or typical quality, mood, or attitude of a person, group, or period of time.

    “A moment of enlightenment is of no use to someone who needs a good week of it.”  ~Idries Shah

We may need more than a week of enlightenment, yet in our modern cultures all we get are bite-sized Youtube-compatible fleeting moments. The prevailing mood of our times is one where the ‘spirit’ is like the radio-friendly three-minute pop song. It is a digestible burst that we can chew on without it giving us indigestion. We have literally thousands of online videos showing us how to improve almost every aspect of our lives by breathing, body postures, mental exercises, visualizations, and the good old self-to-mirror pep talks. We are told that we ‘create our own reality,’ despite the obvious fact that in many countries we have accepted sociopaths in power – or perhaps we voted them into office? If that is our reality, then what does it say about ourselves – that most of us are latent sociopaths with a hidden agenda for inflicting suffering upon others? If this is creating our own reality, then most of us must also be secretly longing for therapy.

It seems that the sublime has become lost or distorted within the grotesque spectacle of the spirit. That is, aspects of our soul nature have become commoditized and watered down so that they are shards or filaments of their real glory. And modern cultures worship these shards as if the fleeting reflections that fall from them are profound insights. Totems once considered sacred are splashed across social media and shared as if spreading them brings us amplified gratification. Phrases of some truth are gobbled rapidly as we scroll down the various quote-images that fill our media feeds. We breakfast on these handy spirit pop-tarts; yet we hardly have time to consume their words of wisdom. We yearn only for the quick fix, the morning shot of ‘feel good’ wisdom packaged with a pleasing image, be it nirvana, Samadhi, or some surreal bliss. Colorful figures in lotus positions with flowers blossoming from their chakras adorn our virtual walls and our desktops; we have their presence programmed as our screen images. Transcendence comes through the third eye as it sits in the center of the forehead awaiting patiently its activation through social-media triggers. And if the colorful chakras in the lotus position don’t get you, then there are countless videos of cute cats to make you go all fluffy and tingly inside. Whilst serious videos online only receive moderate viewing figures, the ones of cat compilations or a cute cat trying to do yoga will get in excess of ten million hits.

Popular cultures the world over have become saccharine playgrounds where fads and aspartame-coated famous-wannabes parade and trot like peacocks. We are in danger of becoming submerged in the sickly successes of such pop cultures, where the spirit is exposed as a short-cut trip to enlightenment. Of course, there is also ample room for those parodies that make light fun of such pseudo-spirit pretensions. And there are many of these humorous parodies out there in the world too. Thankfully they can make us laugh at the things we take so seriously.

Searching where the Light is

You may think that staring into a mirror, growling to yourself and saying, ‘You are a lion, rarrh!’ is sort of weird, in a surreal, onanistic sort of way. But we’ve been told to do it, or something similar, in a myriad of books on how to develop the spiritual self. We’ve also been urged to call out to the universe and order what we want to arrive in our lives, naming it as ‘cosmic ordering’ (with Amazon-style delivery). It’s all part of the new quantum reality we live in, or so we are told by ‘experts’ in the quantum field (which is more often people who have taught themselves Life Coaching from an online course). And yet here there is the question of what I term the ‘Quantum Dilemma – the understanding that our reality is energy-based and responsive to observation (the observer effect) should have torn down our walls of reality-construction. And yet instead what we got were new-agey fluffball books on the likes of ‘quantum-ordering’ and how to ask the cosmos for our own riches and fantasized lifestyles. We know there is something strange going on over there in the dark (dark energy, dark matter) but we don’t truly wish to look for it as it’s easier to stay in the mainstream light. There’s a story on this from the incomparable Mulla Nasrudin, and it goes like this:

    Someone saw Nasrudin searching for something on the ground.


    ‘What have you lost, Mulla?’ he asked.


    ‘My key,’ said the Mulla. So they both went down on their knees and looked for it.


    After a time the other man asked: ‘Where exactly did you drop it?’


    ‘In my own house.’


    ‘Then why are you looking here?’

Inside of our own house is often where we choose not to look. It is too dark, and the discoveries, should they come, are bound to be too close to home – quite literally! Perhaps it would help us if we adorned the house a little. Maybe a talisman here, a crystal there, or any other number of paid-for objects and trinkets that have been imported from elsewhere and now peddled in western markets and online stores.

What is less well-known is the concept that spiritual practices that were once legitimate can lose their functionality if they are taken out of their original context of time and place. Then, even worse, is when such precise tools are used in a haphazard way, such as combining different elements into a new and modern groovy pop-spirit assemblage. When symbols of ‘higher learning’ become atrophied – meaning they are no longer adapted to the culture, the time, and the people – they often incite a ‘Pavlovian’ dog response on the part of the practitioners. Pop spirit emblems, symbols, and trinkets are easily transferred into fetish totems; such as the religion of Rastafari came to be symbolized by the trendy poster of Bob Marley smoking a fat reefa that was sticky-taped onto tens of thousands of student’s bedsit walls. The two things are just not the same: emotional totems do not constitute the real thing. Popular spirituality – today’s pop spirit – has become its own marketplace in the modern world. An old saying comes to mind here – The bird which knows not of sweet water has his beak in salt water all the year.

The pop spirit marketplace is hot – it offers exorbitant choice in the belief that more is good. This encourages some people to take, experiment, taste, and dabble with a rag-bag bunch of spiritual goodies in the hope that the resulting fusion will develop their ‘essential self.’ Whilst there are sincere and genuine developmental tools and practices in the world, the online social media-sphere becomes the window-displays for attractive quotations, phrases, and slogans that are hungrily consumed by a fast-paced crowd. It is easier to ‘like’ and ‘share’ a spiritual tool these days than to consider its use. Pop spirit, like breakfast pop tarts, are tastily consumable, although high in sugary fats. The modern media marketplace delivers an easy ‘on-demand’ lifestyle which is making us lazy and complacent in that we are used to receiving what we request; and either immediately or within 24-hours. Pop spirit fits nicely onto this conveyor belt of spiritual-supply goodies. There are plentiful videos of some young, attractive person telling us how to reach inside for that ‘something higher’ as they have a clean beach and rolling waves in the background. The commodity spirit tells us that having one hundred thousand subscribers is a good sign of the health of the soul. Spreading the Holy Spirit these days gets rated by rising subscribers and on how many people click the thumbs up.

The contemporary world of pop spirit is mainly a material one as it is based in terms of transaction. That is, those involved usually want to get something in exchange for something else. It’s a trade-off, and a commercial one at that. It is a form of seeking that has yet to learn the fundamentals. There is a story which tells of a spiritual seeker who after some time comes upon a spiritual master that she feels is genuine and whom she wishes to learn from. The seeker asks the master if he will accept her as a pupil.

    ‘Why do you seek a spiritual path?’ asks the teacher.


    ‘Because I wish to be a generous and virtuous person; I wish to be balanced, mindful, caring, and to be in service for humanity. This is my goal’ said the seeker.


    ‘Well’, replied the teacher, ‘these are not goals on the spiritual path; these are the very basics of being human which we need before we even begin to learn’.

Pop spirit may make us feel better as we scroll down the feel-good quotes over breakfast – but will it last until lunch time? Our daily fix of uplifting quotes and video blessings may not be an antidote to the missing essentials. Contemporary societies with their surface acquisitions and quick-fix remedies may only be glossing over a very real emptiness.

The resurrection of novel, intriguing, and peripheral ideologies and trends in the online world has brought about a new celebration of ‘consumer curiosities’ that range from acquired happiness, sexual fetishes, to extra-terrestrials. With previous restraints of access now thawed out we are seeing a reappearance of these various spectacles that are being celebrated in whatever form online surfers desire. And desire, it seems, is highly sought after.
 The Simulation of Desire

There is no doubt that modern life, and its institutions, attempt to seduce us. We are breaking down as well as digitizing our boundaries of longing. Modern cultural landscapes and digital realms are de-territorializing the reach of the voyeur. There is now a shift in how desires are being redirected into new stimulated sensibilities and customized indulgences. We are being drawn into new modes of seduction – a form of ‘always available’ easy access. Seductions no longer tease us with waiting but can be instantaneously ‘streamed’ in the ever-present now. We are entering saturation point of the sexually explicit – online pornography raises its head as the new ‘desire of despair’ at the same time as children are being groomed, pedophiles are virtually gathering, and the beast within us licks its hideous lips.

Our modern cultures are more highly sexualized than ever as pornography has gone mainstream. Our advertising allures us with sexual imagery, references, and innuendoes. We are getting turned on from music videos that are filling up with scantily clad and booty-shaking extras that gyrate to the groove. Porn stars are making cameos in music videos and porn scenes are pantomimed and mimicked across the wide cultural scene. Fitness clubs offer pole-dancing and strip classes, and porn star memoirs are sold by top publishers and given table space in the big corporate bookshops. The once-peripheral world of pornography has now fused with the commercial mainstream. The moral bankruptcy of porn now shapes much of our western popular culture. Sex has always been big business. Sex sells better than bearded gurus and pop spirit combined. And many people see sex as a ticket to fame.

Sex tapes are famously ‘leaked’ online in a new twisted route to celebrity cultdom. These private performances are ‘accidentally’ made public in a bid for publicity and fame that represents a new and odd kind of fetishism, soaked in libidinal online viral flows. The simulation of desire is central to the digital realms, where arousal, demand, and creation co-exist. Almost any desires can be downloaded for instant gratification and viewer deflowering. Online pornography is a form of virus that absorbs endless amounts of libidinal energy that greases the cogs of digitized desire. These desires are soon to be projected into ‘false bodies’ as the robot sex toy becomes the next must-have gadget. Soon, Barbie will seem, well – quite timid. A recent report from futurologist Dr. Ian Pearson predicts that:

    By 2030, most people will have some form of virtual sex as casually as they browse porn today.
    By 2035 the majority of people will own sex toys that interact with virtual reality sex.
    We will start to see some forms of robot sex appearing in high-income, very wealthy households as soon as 2025.
    We will start to see robot sex overtaking human-human in 2050.2

Suddenly those closet-hidden doll inflatables will look like relics from the past. The experience of desire will soon be mediatized in a totally new way, with virtual reality and robot sex becoming a new and crowded playground. Yet this new experience is also likely to lead to an over-abundance of quick desire that may ultimately leave us unfulfilled – possibly leading to not sexual repression but rather a form of sexual depression. An over-plentiful supply of substitute sex may create a real wound of longing that a hyperreal world will be incapable, and unqualified, to cater for.

The spirit that dwells within us, that makes us a soulful species, is far away from the popular spirituality that invades our news feeds and social media. It is not a collection of colorful pixels or groovy 10-minute videos. I’m positive about the great future awaiting us, yet getting there entails moving beyond the immaturity of our commoditized desires.


1 Shah, I. 1985. The Exploits of the Incomparable Mulla Nasrudin. London: Octagon Press, p9.

 2 ‘By 2050, human-on-robot sex will be more common than human-on-human sex, says report,’ The Telegraph,, (,) 29th September 2015 (accessed 20th June 2017) (
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on December 01, 2019, 04:02:24 PM

 “Life is pain, highness. Anyone who says differently is selling something.”

Marcus Aurelius’s Guide to Inner Freedom

Marcus Aurelius’s "Meditations" instructs us in practices to restore our power of free will.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: moniker on December 01, 2019, 07:08:54 PM
Supposedly western civilization started with ancient Greeks who recommended a sound mind in a sound body but left out the soul. So there does not appear to be anything modern about this.
Title: Re: The new science of inner speech
Post by: azozeo on December 05, 2019, 09:37:31 AM

Changing Outer Reality Requires Changing Inner Reality

December 3rd, 2019

By Paul Lenda

Staff Writer for Wake Up World

We all have our desires and wishes for how we would like to see the world. We may rise up against the oppressive control matrix and join resistance movements, believing that opposition by force, even if it’s for a good cause, is the way to create meaningful change.

I’m here to tell you that this is simply untrue. External reality does not take on form until internal reality is formed. Whatever the form of the internal reality is, the external will be a reflection of it. The collective group consciousness of people, be it in a family, village, country, or the entire global noosphere, will reflect in the external shared reality.

Remember, we cannot call for world peace while we are still fighting within…fighting self-destructive shadows that are wreaking havoc on our peace of mind. The outer reality is a reflection of the inner reality, both individually and collectively. The sooner we realize that, the sooner we understand that mandated change by force will always be doomed to fail. We will simply match up to the reality we resonate with at the moment.
Change Yourself to Change the World